PC 1962-1963-784. ~~ ' (_,i
1 RESOLUTION N0. 784, SERIES 1962-63
~f•
A RESOLUTION OF TAE CITY PLANNLNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDJNG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ;HAT
PETITIOl~ FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62-63-120 gE APPROVED
~ ~: WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissian of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for ReclessiSca-
~,,,,,b; tion f:om MARY B. DOESKEN, 2748 West Ball Road, Anaheim, Caiifornia, Owner of Parcel No. 1;
':~~ JACK H. & MARJORIE JEAN WOOD, 2738 INes.t .Ball_.Road, Maheim, California, Owners of Parcel
:?~ No. 2; LR~NARD V. HOUAS, 315 I~orth Manchester, Maheim, California, Agent of cer.tain real prqp-
:~;; erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
;~~ PARCEL N0. 1: The•West 132 feet of the East 66~ feet of the North half of the Northwest.qvarter
`~ of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los
~~ Coyotes, as shown on a Map record~d in.Boolc 5J, Pags 11 of Misceblaneous Maps~ records of
!- ~ Orange County, Galifornia. PARCEL.NQ. 2; The West 132.00 feet of the East 529.00 feet of
' the North half of the Northwes~ quarter of the Northeast quarter of Sectiun 24, Township 4
$outh, Range 11 W~st, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, page
~~~ lI of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California
' • and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiasion clld hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Mah~im on
May 27~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hesring hevueg been duly given as required by
law and in accordence with ihe provisions of the Mah~:im Municipal Co~e, Chupter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and agsinst said ptoposed reclassification end to investigete and make flndings an3 cecommendetiohs in connection
therewith; aad
. 14HEREAS, said Commission, after due inapection, investi~etion, and study made by itself and in it~ behelf, and
after due considewtion of all evidence and :eports ofEered at ac+id hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the petitioner pcoposes a reclessiHcation of ihe above descri}.ed property fmm the R-A~ Residential
Agricultural,.Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one and
two-story multiple family planned residential development with carports.
2. Thet the proposed reclassification oE subject propecty is neces~ary and/or desireble for the orderly and pco-
per development of tfie community.
3. Thet the proposed reciassificetion of subject property dees propeely relete to the zones and theirpermitted
uses locelly established in close proximi4y to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uaes geneeelly esteb-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plan.
5. That one person ~~peared in opposition to subject petition.
~;, ..
; Rl-A
-1-
_ _.__.___-___._...________.__._.______,...,_.~_~._._~......_.._._._..... ~' .
' ' • • _. . . .._ _____
~ -- --
• "~-- ----- --'~-"% ~ ~
_~.. . , .. . . .~Pd. ~ . . . . .
, ..
, ,
;
~ ~~
: a
., _ ~..~ . ..
~
-------- -_.......r_.~__.__.._...__._.Y.__-------- . . - ----
_ . __.. .. .. . . .___ .. . - -
_ _ _
'~
.~ ;
( ~ ~;,.~' i
3
- wNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE90LV"r~ that the.Anaheim City Planning Commissian does hereby j
~ecommend to.the C.ity Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for. Reclassification ~
be approved and, by so doing,.-that iitle 18-Zoning of the Anah~ei~ Mwlici.pal Code be amended to ~
exclude.the above.descr.ihed,property from the R-A,.Residential.Agricultural, Zone and to ±
incorpora'se said described property in the R 3., Multiple Family RESidential, Zone upon the ~
following con~itions which are hereby found .to be a necessary prerequisite -~o the proposed use ~
of subject pxoperty in ordes to preserve. the safety and general welfare of the citizens of ;
the City of .Anaheimo ;
i_ T},?± ±t,o nwner of subiect property_shall deed to.the Cit~~ of Maheim a strip of land f
fifty-three (53) feet.in width, from the centerline of the street, along tiali Noad, ror t
street widening purposes.
2. That str.eet.impxavement plans shall be prepaxed and all engineering requirements of i ;
~
the City of Anaheim along Hall Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,. street grading and '
drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall.be_completed as r.equired by the
paying, ? ;
..
.
City Engineer and in accordance with.standard plans and specifications on file in the Office ~ ;
of th~ City Engineer; and (b) that a bond in an amount.and form satisfactory to the City of ~ ~
Anaheim shall be posted with the Gity to guarantee the installation of said engineering ~ ;
requireinents.
3. That the owner of subject property ahall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 ~ i
~ ~
per front foot 51ong Ba11 Road, for street lighting purposes. 3 ;
4. Tha~ a modified-cul~de~sac be provided at the terminus of MacDuff Street subject to s
the approval of the City of Stantono ~ -~
5. That the owners.of subject.pr.operty.shall.dedicate.to,.the..Ci.ty of.Anaheim a strip of 5 ~
land forty-four (44) feet in width along.the eas~terly boundary of subject property for street 1 '3
improvement purpcses, which street.shall terminate .in a cul-de-sac with a minimum radius ;~ ~
of twenty-seven (27).feeto An .irrevocabTe agreement shal.l be entered into between the ;
'
developer and the City of Anaheim as to the cost of the land of the easterly fourteen (14) ,4 -
;
feet of said street, and a proportionate share of the undarground utilities and street x
improvements, which agreement shall.pxo~.ide that.in conjunction with the dedication and ~
impr.ovement of an..additional sixteen (16).feet f.or an..ultimate sixty (60) foot xight-of-way 3
by the o~,~ner of the abut•ting property to the.ea'st, said abutting property owner shall pay to ,;
the owner of subject property the agr.eed upon.pre-determined price for the.easterly fourteen '~
(14) feet of subject property as a condition of approval of the development of said ;;s
abutting property. "
6. That the street.improvement plans.shall.be prepared and all engineering requirements j
of the City of Anaheim along the newly dedicated street, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, ~
street grading and paving, dsainage.facilities,•or other appurtenant work shall be completed {
as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications ~
on file in the office of the City Engineer; pro'vided that a temporary asphalt berm shall be
installed along the eastexly one foot of said street; and (b) that a bond in an amount ar,d ~
form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the ;
installation of said engineering requirements. '
7. That the owner of subject proper•ty shall pay to;the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 ~~
per £ront foot, along tA,e west side of the newly dedicated street, for street lighting ? ,
purposes; or the installation of street lights on the new street in accordance with a street
~ V ~g
Iighting plan approved by the Director'of Fublic Uti].ities. ~ '~
8. That the compl.etion of these reclassi.fication proceedings shall be ;ubject to ~
th.e granting of ConditionaZ Use Permit No. 426. 3
9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, above mentioned, shall be complied wii.h
within a period of one hundred and eighty (180j days from date hereof, or such further time M-
~ as the City Council may granta
10~ That develcpment shall be substantially in accordance with Revision No. ls Exhibit
'
'~ '
Nos. 1, 2, and 3, provided that the 4-~3welling unit building immediateiy to the-we5~'af°~}ie ~ ~
recreation area shall be deleted, and tbat the three dwelling unit bu~lding to t he north '~
and south of the recreation area shall be increased to 4-units, in order to provide needed ; ~
recreational facilities ir. conjunction with the development of the proposed planned '
i
~es_dential developmento ;
r.
THE FOREGC?ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of May, 1963. ;
1~~
~
i
~
~
~
~ a
e
A~
.
.[~
rt~ /~+
_
CHAI ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM1~"' i ~
,~
~ PRO TFM ~ ~
~ RESOLUTION iQO. 784
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
'1 ,
~
k
~ ~ - . .
. ~ .
~
~i
. . . . .
i R2-A -2- . '~ '~
~
r - -.---~.____-----.__....___.___~.___...__~_._..~____...~..~._._..._.......__._
~......,. M'~}.~.. ~~ _ ' ~ • . ''r~--------__~~.
3 ATTEST:
{~ ~
~
~~
i ~2/
~
i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
k STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
OOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~
i I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City P)anning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
'~ certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
~: Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on.May 27, 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M.~
''
i,
~ ~ by the following vote of the members thereofs
AYESa OOMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Nungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland,
• ~ Sides.
;; NOESs OOMMISSIONERSs None.
~=.
1;
y,
ABSENTs OI~MMISSIONERS: None.
~,
~ IN WITNESS WHERHJF, I have here~mto set my hand this 27th day of May, 1963.
~ ~ ~ / ~
~ "i1 I/(/ ~
i; SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
w, RESOLUTION N0. 784
y
; 's _
: . R3-A -3- ..
i
i
I
~ ;
~---- -.-,.'~~.. ~-_ - ~~ - ----~------------ _-_------
~.
~ ____._-•-~_..
~_ ----__...__ _.
,~ " '
~