PC 1962-1963-795~' . } . :.' .. '
I -~ ._
i~ "Q'Y~' .•~~ ~~.. l 4 .~ , -.-
- ,.J• -,. 6
~
f.~}
RESOLUTION N0. ~959 SERI~S 1962-•63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-12i BE DENIED
nciERcAS, ine Ciiy rinnning Commissian oi ine Ciiy oi itneneim did receive a veriiied t~etition for Reclassiflce-
tion from pFtTHUR F~RHERT 8 BET?Y ANN SHIPKEYq Post Off=•„e Box 7, Maheim, California, Owners;
KENNEfH LAEy 914 West I.incoln. Maheim, California, Aqent oF certain •real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of ~range, .State of California, described as that part of Lot
No. 4 0~ the Mahe3m.Extension as su•rveyed by William Hamel.and filed in the office of the
County r.ecoxder of 1.os ~ngeles County„ a copy of which is r.ecorded in Haok 3, page 163, and
fotlowing of "I.os Mge:1e~ .Co::nty Map~" in the office of the County .Recorder, Orange County,
California, descr.ibed asa Beginning at.the Nortl~.xest carner. nf said.I.ot No~ 4, being in the
centerline.of Sycamore fitreet 49.,5 feet.wide, thence Southerly alona the West line of Lot No. 4
and the East line of No•rth East Street 15'L~55 feet, thence North 74~ 31' 10" East parallel to
the centerline of Sycamore Stxeet, 190~'10 feet; thence North 15~ 05' 20" West 151055 feet to
the North line of said Lot No~ ~ being a point In the cen+arl~ne of said Sycamore Street; thence
West along the North 1£ne of Lot No„ h and the centerline of Sycamore Stxeet, 190„73 feet to the
point of ber3inningd ~XC~?TiNG THFREFROM the Easterly 65 feet ;and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heering et the Clty Hell in the City of Aneheim on
June 10~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'cluck P.M., notice of aeid public hearing heving been duly given as r~quired
by law end in accordnnce wlth the provisions of the Anehelm Municipel Gcde, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evI-
dence fur end ageinst seid pcoposed reclassdficntion end to investigsto end make findings end recommendations in
cronnection thetewith: end '
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, inveatigstion, end study medc by itself end in ite behalf,
and efter due conaidewtion of all evidence and reports offered at seid heering, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclassiEication oE the ebove described property from the R-19 One FBmily
Residential, Zone Lo f:}ie G••i„ N~eighhox•hood Comme•r::ial, Zone9 to permit the establishment
of a servioe stat3on on s•ubject. oroperty~
2~ T'hat the pz•oposed re~:'lassific:;a±ion oF snb3e:;t p:roherty is not necessary and~or
desirable fo•r the o•rderl~y and p1•ope•r development of the conurcanYty,.
3a That the praposed •reclassif'ic:atiori ef sub~ec:t pxoperty does not properly rolate
to the zones and their pe:rm3tted ~ses 1o~ally estabiished in c'lose preximity to subject
property and to the zones and t:heir pe:cmitted uses generai'ly es•tablished throughoui: the
community~
4, Tha~ subfec•t px•opert•y wouid constitute spoi; zoning if approved~
5~ That proposed deve:opment ~rould ha~vs an adverae affect on the area in which
it is located and would be conts.ary tn the genera'1 ~r~e1f'a•re of the •residents •residing in
'che areaa
6o That one spokesman in fa~~or of subjeet petition resided on property immediately
to the south of sub;~ect prope•r.ty whichy if sub~ec~L petition were approved9 may logically
be zoned also for uommercial~
7„ That three pe•rsons appea•red in fa~~or9 and ~;hree pex•sons app~a•red in opposition
to sub~ect petii:ion~
~
I
i
i
t
Rl-D , -1-
__ - ~
~
~
j_ . __
{
~ ,
I `
~`~
ti~
'i~
.~1
~
,;
;
,.
i
;
,
;
;
~' . ~
,
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plann3ng Commission does heeeby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclessificntion be denied on the basis of 4he
aforementione3 findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this IOt"r_ day of June, 1963~
CHAIRMAN AIZAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSYO
PRO TF1~1
ATTEST:
3EC TARk' ANAAE ITY PLANNING COMMISSYON
PRO TFNI
STATE QF CALYFORNIA ) .
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Iy Ann KTebs~ Sec:etary of the City Plsnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, held an
June I0~ 1963y at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theieof:
AY.~',S: COMN.'ISSIONERS: A31•redy Camp~ Gt~a•vos„ Gauea•., Pebley9 kaw'!and, Sideso
t30ES: COMMISSIONERS: Ncne~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Pe.rr~yy Munga7.le
IN 1VITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m,y hend this lOth day of Juney 19630
~.f~l/t~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM Y PLANNING COMMISSION
Pl~ TEM
RESOLUTION Ii~J.795
R2-D -2_
I
!
~
,
_
, -------
`- ~ ~
:-
-=-. . . " .. , ._ ~
~
~ ~....... _m, ... .. . r .. ~ .