PC 1962-1963-807
~ .
4
. ,
' . . . . x~.' ,' F, ' .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ..: ~1
1
. ~ :l . - . .
. - .. . . '•`..~ . .
.
~
~ ~ .. ...s...~. , (._) .
RESOLUTION-NO. 8G7' SERYES 1962-63
A RESOLUT30N OF THE C1TY PLANNIIQG COMMIS5ION OF THE CITY OF AIdAH~Li1
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL L3SE PERMIT NO 436 gE DENIED
WFI~REpS, the City Pleefning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a vedfied Petition fo: C~adiUonel
Uoe Peemitfrom HYA BIELANSKI9 2760 4escent9 Anaheim, Califoxnia, Qevnery WILLIAM Jo KI9GENs
s~14 EaJless Street~ o±??heim; California<.Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of :.naheim, County of Orange9.State of California9 described as~the Nortn 425 ie~ti vr
the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Sect~.on 129 Township 4
3outh , Range ll W~st, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as sho~m on a map.•thereof recorded in
book 51, page.7, et seqe9 Miscellaneouc Maps, secords of said Orange Ca~ntl; EXCEPTIIZG the
West 3Y0 feet ` '
~Y
~'fi
i
• (
,
t
; end
PIHEF.EAS, the City Pleaning Commission did hold a public headng at tha City Heli in the City of Meheim on.
Jutte 24y 19639 at 2:00 o'dock P.M., notico of eaid public hearing having beep duly given as ce4uired by
law estd ih eccordence with the praeiaions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18,64, to hear end coneider evidence
for end egeiaet aeid proposed conditional uso ettd to iavestigete and malce findings and recommendetions !n connection •
theiewith; end '
VYFiEREAS, aeid Commieeioa, eftar dua inapection, investigation, and atady mada by itoolf and in ite be;~alt,
ar.d eftar due consideratina of ell evidence ead ropotte offe~ed at seid hearing, dose fiad aad determine tlta following f~te:
1, That the ptoposed use is pr~,~erly oae for vehich a Conditional TJse Perm3t is autho~ized by this Code, to wit:
establish a single story multiple family planned residential development.
2. That the proposed use will advorsely affect the ad3oining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which i.t is proposed te he located.~
3. That the,proposed devslopment would be incompatible to the single family residential
integrity of property abutting on the north, east and south sides of sub3ect propertyo
4. That sub~ect property is developable for a low densi.iy single f amily subdivisiono
5. That six~ (6) persons appeared, one of whom presented a petition signed by eighteen
(18) personsq and one letter was reoei~r~d in opposition, and that one person appeared in
favor of subject petitione '
}
3
i
;
~
?,..
i . _ . -..~.-.~-----------_____-___~ ._.~__.._,._.. ~ __~.r_._._._.._.._. :
r~ , . . _ _.., . . . _ .____. ~ .
-.~.~~..__~._.....~. !$~' ` ~ ~ `~
, . , ~
~;
~_~
~}
`.. ~~
. NOW,.TIiEREFORE, EE IT RE50LVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commiasion does hereby deny subJect
Petition for Conditionel Use Permit on the baeie of tha efocementioned findings.
THE FQREGOING RESOLUTION is eigned ead appmved by me,this 24th day of June9 1963a
,
~ ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: p~ T~
~iC~~~~'=~`~-~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNII'~1G COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFdRIvEA )
COUNTY OF ORANdE ) eq.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Ia Ann Krebsy Secratary of the Ciry Plenning Commiasion of the City of Aneheim, do heraby certlfy that the fore-
going reaoluUaa wes paeeed end adopted et a meeling of the City Planaing Commlesion ofthe City of pneheim, held on
June 24~ 1963, , at 2:U0 o'clock P.Nf., by the foll~wing vote of the membets theseof:
A,YES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sideso
NOES: COMM3SSIONERS: Nona.
~
'ABSENT: COMMI3Si0NERS: Camp, Chavos, Mungall.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto ebt my hand thle 5th day of July9 1963,
~i~ .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMfSSION
RESOLUTION N0. 807
C2-~7 -2-
--.___ -- -__..___
- - ~-`" _ .