PC 1963-1964-861'~; ,
1"••.c
RSy
~_,;.
;~~,:
R~~
Z;.;.
:~
'~•,
Ei`.
;f;;
, ~.,.
,1.
5:
~
i
~ ~. ~
. ~~•;.
RESOLUTION NO,
861, SERIES 1963•-64
1~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. '1594 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anehelm did receive a verified Petition for Variance
from CHARENCE Wo & IDALEP. Ro BACKUS9 537 Sherwood Drive9 Anaheim, California9 Owners; FRED
Co LANE9 710 South Raitt, Santa Ana, California, A~ent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, Count~v of Orangey State of Californiay described as the Southerly 15
feet of Lot Noo 28 and aIl of Lot No~ 29, Block A of Lairds Subdivision, ar.d further described
as 417 South Melrose,9 AnaheimY California .
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public heerine at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on August 59 1963y at 2 00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering having been duly given es re~uiced
by lew and in eccordence with the p:ovisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence Eor and egainst said proposed veriance and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behaif,
end efter due consideration of all evidence and ceports offered as seid hearing, does find and determine the following
facEs:
1. Thet the petitioner cequests a varience from the Anaheim Municipal Code: Section 18~800080 which
requires a minimum livable floor area of 1225 square f'eet, to permit the construction of
an additional 810 square feet singie-•femil.y dweTling with a ten (10) foot buildi.ng seNara-~
tion~ and a five (5) foot side yard on the sea~ of s•ubject propertya
2. Thet thece a:e exceptional or extraordinary ciccumstences or conditions appliceble to the propecty involved
or to the intended use of the pcoperty that do not epply generall~ to the property or clase of use in the seme vicinity
and zone. •
3. That the cequested varience is necessery for the preservation and enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the propecty in question.
4. Thet the :equested veriance will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfate or injurious to the prop-
eriy or imp:ovemenis in sucn viciniiy and zone in wnictt iae property is Iocaied.
~ 5. Thet the requested varience will not adversely affect the Comprehensive Generel Plan.
6o That the .requested waiver of Section 18~280010 (3) which requires a minimum of
fiftcen (15) feet between one fami'ly dwel'lings on the same lot, and Section 18~32a080 (2)
which requi•res a 7~-foot side yard has been deemed unneces~ary and are hereby deniedy but
that ~vaiver of Sectiott 18080„080 which requi•res a minimum livable £loor a•rea Qf 1225 square
:eet is hereby granted..
7o That one (1) person appeared in opposition to subject petitiono
Vl-G ~ -1-
:a>- - ~ ~ , -
_.~._.__-._____~i ~
.
- ,~ ~.,_:.~.,,,-.~.,~...~_._.___..n_
... .. ....~. i:... ..~~_..J_~ . .... . .. ~ .+r _:. ~ ~.<n.v.~:...~~..~~.~~..__..~.~.~..._.._..~._.._.~...__._..~.___'____-__'"__'_' ... ....... .. ... .. .
s„
I
~~:r ~
~'~~~~~. ~ ,~ l~ s•~ .
r'-'
I
W~ ::
i:.~+, :.
n.°!.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby dppTOVe
= Variance No: 1594 far ii: ~rariance from 5ection 1R.80s080 onl and denies the variance '
'~:';: Y~ ;
from Sections 1fie2Re010(3) and 1R,32~OR0(2)upon the following conditions which are he•reby ;
;~'`~ found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order ~
to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheimo ~
~;~: le That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
;~;~ of $25000 for the new unit to be used for park and recreat~an purposes, said anount to be
~~~- paid at the time th~ building permit is issuedo
tj`, 2a That revised develcpment plans for sub3ect property shail be subject to the
~ approval of Development Review, prior to issuance of the building permito ,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppcoved by me this 15th day of AugustY 19630
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIAI CITY PL G COMMISSION
• ATTEST:
~"'~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNLTG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF Ot2ANGE ) ss.
CITY OF t1NAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the ~ity of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- ~
going resolution wes pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on ~~
AugUSt 5y 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: ~
Z
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Mungail, Pebiey, Perryy Sideso ~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Rowlando '~
ABSENT: ~ COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Chavoso
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 15th day of August, 19630
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
RESOLUTION N0. 861
V2-G _2_