Loading...
PC 1963-1964-889~~ ~ ' j ' . 4,, :...... -,. ~~+..~ ~' ' ~2ESOLLITIO~i N0. 889• SERIES 1963-64 A RESQLUTION OF 'i'HE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITIOPi FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 462 IdE GRANTED WHEREAS, ihe City Plennia~ Commission of the ~'•ity of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditionui Use Permitfcom JOHN D. ARDAIZ, et ux, 1008 North Highland Avenue, Fullerton, California, Owners; RICHFIEZD OIL G~ORPORATIONg 645 South Maiiposa Avenue, Los Angeles 5, Callfornia Agents of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State cf ~alifornia, described as the South 165 feet of the Wesi: 155 feet of iot 5 in Block 17 of a~ubdivision of the South one-half of Section 21, Township 4 South, Range 10 YJest, San ~er:~a- dino Base and Meridian, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 1, page 33, Miscelian:~o~as Record hlaps, records of said Orange Ccunty ~ uala 5ri. WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commi~sion did hol~ a public hcering at .the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on S eptember 4~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of saia public hearing having been duly given as requiced by law end ie accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.6d, to hear and consider evideace for and again~t seid proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and cecommendations in connection theeewith; and . V]H~REAS, seid Commissioa, after due iaspection, investigation, end study made by itself end in its behalf, end after due considecetion of all evidence end repox~s offeced at said hearing, does find and detem~ine the following facts: i. That the ptoposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel,Use Permit is authorized by thls Code, to witiconstrtict steel canopies over existing pump islands. . 2. That the pcopased use will aot edvecsely a£fect the adjoiaing land uses end the growth end developmer.t of the acea in which it is pmposed to be located. 3. That the size end shepe of the site proposecl foe the use is adequate to allow the full developmeat of the propoEed use in a manner not detrimental to the perticular area nor to the peace, health, sefety, end genecal welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. . 4. That the granting of the Conditionei Use Permit undec the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, heal:h, saEeky, and general welfece of the Citizens of the Citp of Anehe3m. ;ia That ttre traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and impruved to carry the traffic in the :area. 6. Th3t no one appeared in opposition to suhject petition. Cl-G '1' ,_,....'---_~__.. _.. _... - --.._... __..----.~...,----'- ---_.., . - ~ ~---•.._.~ --'.-'._--..__.__ ._._--'..... . 1 -- - -' ,-'--.._.~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ -1 __. ...~:"~ ..._-----._._ _._... ~; . :~. -- ,~ ~~ ~: ~' ~ RESOLUTION NO. ~~9~ SERIFS 1963-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF A1dAHEINf THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 462 BE G12ANTED WHEREAS, the City Planniag Commiss4on of the City of Anaheim did receive u verified Petition for Conditional Use Permitfcom JOHN D. ARDAIZ, et ux, 1008 North Highland Avenue, Fullerton, California, Owners; RICHFIELD OIL COR~"'ORATION~ 645 South Masiposa Avenue, Los Angeles 5, California Agents of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of ~alifornia, described as the South 165 feet of the Plest 155 feet of Lot 5 in Block 17 of a Subdivision of the South one-half of Section 21, Township 4 South, Range 10 Wes±~ San Berna- dino Base and Meridian, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 1, page 33, P.4iscellaneous Record Maps, records of said Orange County ; and ~ 4 ~ E ~ ~. r:; ;:i t~ W4iEREAS, the City Planning Commiasion did hold a pubL'c hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 4~ 19b3~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as ~equiced by law end in accocdence wlth th° pmvisionc of the Anaheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64, to hesr nnd consider evidence for and against seid proposed conditional use and to investigeto and meke findings and cecommendetions in connection the:ewith; end WHERGAS, said Commission, after due insp~ction, iavestigatioa, end study made by itself and in its behelf, and efter due coasir.1eratioa of sll avidence aad repatt3 of.fered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facta: 1. Thet the pmpased use is properly une for which a Conditional.Use Permit i~ authodzed by this Code, to wit:constrUCt steel canopies over existing pump islands. . 2, That the proposed use will aat edvecsely affect the adjoining laad uses end the growth and development of thn erea in which it is proposad to be loceted. 3. That the siae and ahepe of 4~e ~i!e proposed foe 4he usc: is edequate to allow the full development o£ the proposed use in .~ manner not detriment:~ to the particular area nor to the peece, health, sefery, and general welfare of the Ci.izens ot the City of Anaheim. , 4. T'het the granting of the Conditionel Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and generel welfece of the Citizens of the City~ of Aneheim. 5e That tkre traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the,area. 6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. Cl-G '1' T . ~ _ ,..~ _ _ ~~r ,.,F:-~_. .~.. ___,_._. , __ .. _ ~.: ._. ~~ '~; YOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLiiED that the Aneneim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which a:e hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in o:der to preserv=• the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahe_m: . i 1. Tha~ subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 ar.d 2. . THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day of September' 19630 . ~/~Gfitn• i _ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CIT P NNINC COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI PLANNING COMMISSION S'fATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s~. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ;~ D ! 9 Ann Krebs9 Secretery of the City I~lenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby certify that the ~ t' foregoing resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, ~ !' f held on September 49 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: ~ i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Rowland. - ~ ! ~ ;:~ i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonee ~ e ;~ i ABSEN'P: CO~irviISSiONERS: Allred, Camp, Perry, Sideso ~ ~`.•j ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I haveheceunto set my hand this 12th day of September~ 19630 + e ~ ! .;~i ~ ~ ~ ::~ I ~ ;; j,~ ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ; ~ ;J s~ ~ ~ j RESOLUTION N0. 889 ~ -1 tl ,': C2-G S~ -2- . :~ ;~ ~i ~~~ ~ .:r': 7 ~:. ~ + 7 s 4 '% f ': , . .. _ . .__--.... .___._._. __........__ ......:... ....__.... .. _ ._ ... _ ~ .-,~... .,.~ . ~ , . ..__..._. . ... ..._ , _..~_. ~ .._.`_ _._._ ,..,.... ..~_~_ . . .._.. .._-- ~ . .,~ W ------•_,.~e~;r ..»R-~*~.,_.,,,:_..-._,._ ~~ ..__ . . -._,~