Loading...
PC 1963-1964-930~ ~ °~ . ~ _~ ~'~ '~ ~ ~ ;~ I .:: ~.' T ` `'- ~_~: ~. ~, RESOLUTION N0,9309 SERIES 1963-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY FLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM __ RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLA55IFICATION NO. 63-64-28 gE APPROVED WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiseion af the City of Anaheim did receive e vedfied Petition for ReclossiEica- tionfrom JOSEPH Po GLEASON, M,Do, 6189 La Palma Avenue, Buena Park, California, Owner; JACK Ja STRICKLAAID,- AIA, 9012 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove, California, Agent of certain real praperty situatad in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel la That portion of the North half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 7, Township 4 South9 Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a map thereof recorced in book 51, page l0y Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, de- scribed as followsi Beginning at a point in the West line of said Northwest quarter, 366 feet South of the Northwest corner of the Northwest quarter of said Section 7, and running thence East parallel to the North line of said Section 7, 666 feet; thence South parallel to the West line of said Section 7y 220 feet~ thence West parallel to the North line of said Section 7, 666 feet to the West line of Section 7~ thence North along the West line of said Section 7 to the point of beginning and WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on OCtober 14~ 1963y at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of aeid public hearing having been duly given ae required by law ~nd iu eccordence with the provisions of the Meheim MunicIpel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence for and egeinst seid p~oposed reciassiEicetion end to investigete and meke Eindings end cecommendations in connection thecewith; end WHEREAS, seid Conmission, aEter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in ita behet,i, ;nd aEter due conelderetion oE ell evidence and reports oEfered et seid hearing, does Eind end determine the iollowing facts: 1. That the petitionec preposes a reclessiEication of the ebove descdbed property from the G19 Neighborh0od Commercial, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to permit the establishment of a one and two-story multiple family residential development with carportso 2. That the proposed reclessification of subJect property is necessery and/or desireble for the orderly end pra per deyeiopment oE the community. . 3. Thet the pcoposed reclassiEicetion oE subject property doea properly relete to the zones end their pennitted ases locelly established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permitted uses generally eateb- Iished throughout the community. 4o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut upon streets and highways which are p•roposed to carxy the type and quantity of traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation elemeni; of the ' General Plan, 5e That i~ order to provide a circulating water system for sub~ect property tAe recommen- dation of the Water Division that a 5-foot public utility easement along the soutnerly aound- ary or subject property be required so that the water main sex•ving subject property may be ~ tied into a,^, 3xis±ing wai.er main at the end of Haron Streeto This can be accomplished by ', relocating the carport adjacent to the southerly boundary of sub~ect property to the czrport area near Magnolia Avenue. 6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. \... ~ . ~ ;`~' ~' ~~. N'OW, THEREFOnE, BE IT RESOL\1ED that the Aneheim City P'lanning Commission does heceby cecommend to U:e City Council of the City af Anaheim thet subject Petition €or RCClassification be epprovea end, by so doing, thet Titie 18-2or?ne of the Aneheim Municipal CodP be emended to exclude the ehove described property from the C-'l, Neighborhoed Commercia)., Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-3, MUltlpl@ r~amily -cesioeniiai, Zone upon 'CA2 IO110W1n9 cOnuiLlv'r~o wiiii.ii aic ici2~~'.+7 -i'vui+u~ ii.v- ,ti'..~ ~ a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the sa:ety a.nd genera'1 welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheimo -~ lo That street improvement plans sha11 be pre~sared and all engineering x~equirements of the '. City of Anaheim along Magnolia Avenue, such as curbs and gutters9 sidetivalks, street grading and pavir.g9 d•rainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be compieted as required by the City Engineer and in accoi•dance with standard plans and specifications on f ile in the office of the City Engineero • 2o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the Ci•ty of Anahei~ the sum of $2000 per front foot, along Magnolia Avenue, for street lighting purposeso • 3o That the owners of sub~ect property sha11 deed to the City of Anaheim a 5-foot easement ~ along the southerZ•y boundaxy of subject propert~yo ' 4o That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon t he grant- - ing of a Conditional Use Permito 5o Tt,at 3f the st•reet as shown is te be dedicated •to the City of An<iheim9 a tract map shall ; bz xecordedo 6o That Condition Noso 19 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be compiied wi~th within a period ;' of 18G days from date hereof, or such furthex time as the City Council may granto 7o That subject property sha11 be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on fi'le with the City of Anaheim9 marked Revision Noo 1, Exhibit Noso l~thru 49 provided that the carport adjacent to the southerly boundary be re'located to the carport area in a manner as was done for •the model units to provide a walkway for pedeatrians entering and leaving automobi'lesa ~ ~ ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppcoved by me this 24th day of October~ 19630 << ~ ~ ~ t~ 1; '. E: :I . , t~ ` • , • ~ `~ ` CHAIRMAAI ANAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION ~' . ~ :I ATTEST: i ~:~ 3 ~ k RETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 TEM 4 ~'' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I~ „l ` COUNTY CF nR~1NGE ) ss. ~ ~ ~ CITY OF P.NAH~I6t ) > 1 c: '~ ;~ I~ I9 J~ ~ullivany Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore- ~ ~~~ ~ going resolution was passed and adopted et e meeting of the City Planning Commission of 4he City of Anaheim, held on ~ t'~ ' October 149 i963, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceoE: k' ~ '~'~1 ; AY~S: COMMISSIONERS: A11red9 Camp, Chavos9 Gauer, Munga119 Pebley, Perry, Rowl~.nde ';,r ; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo ~ ~ `s r ~~ ; ABSFNT: COMMISSIONERS: Sid?sa 1' ; ';:~ i ;;'~ ~ IN WITNESS NHEREOF, I hru;v :~,eceunto set my hend thia 24th day of October9 19630 ~ ';~ i. • ' ~ . ~ ~ i i ~ ,, • i ~ ~ ;~ l -:;~~,~.~~%~~~v~r~ - -- ~ _, ti i F ;'1 ;, !... +iRY ANAHEIM CITY PLANPiTtiG COMMISSION _ n'_ >'::P9 ~ ;,~ r- RESOLUTION NO. g~Q ' ~ ;:,f_~,~, R2-A -2- ~ . ~ ~ i ~ € R , ,..,. ~ . ~, ` ,,:. . ` .__-- - --___. _.. _ _._ __ _ _ _ _ ..._ _ __-_ _ ___ _ .....___ _ _ . _ .._ __ ~ '. ~ i - A-.. .. ~ ~~......~_"__'~__..,___'"'"_.. ._.. _ _,._~ :.-.-~---`'e ----- .. .. . . . . 'G"it • ~ . . i .... I . • ~~ :-T~- _... .