PC 1963-1964-970:
`.
. . ... . ,, _ .., ,_ .,., ,,;-:
-- ~.
~
RE30LUTION NO. 970. SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CYTY FLANNING COMMISSI~N OF 'fHE C11 Y Gr i+iSi+riEun
RECOh1idENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANe1HEIM THAT
, PETITION FOR,RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63••64-57 gE APPROVED
VJHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom DAVID Wo HOOK, ROhALD Ao KAROS, ROBERT Po GILLMAN, and GUSTAFF T~ ERICKSON,
1780 West..Lincoln Avenue, Suite H, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
Parcel 1, the Easterly 551o3U feet of the Nor~h half of Lot 2, as shown on a Record of
Suruey of part of Section 4, Township 4 South,~Range 10 West, So B, Bo 8 M,, filed in
Book.l, page 55 of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange
County, California, excepting therefrom the South 27,OO.feet; Parcel 2, an Easement for
ingress and.egress over the South 30000 feet of the.North 50000 feet of the North half...
of.:Lot 2, as shown on a Record of Survey of.part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10
West, So Bo B, & M., filed in Book 2, page 55.of Record of Surveys in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the Easterly 551030 feet,
and further described as 1144 North Euclid Street, Anaheim, California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissioa did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Mehelm on
November [i~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearir;g having been duly given as required by
law end in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Mimlcipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and against seid ptoposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and cecommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf, and
efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foliowing facts:
1. Tha; the petitionec proposes a reclassification of the above described property fmm the R-A~ . Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one-story
rnultiple iainily planned residential development v:ith carport~o
2. That the pmuosed reclassiiicaEion of subject property is necesseey 6ridJoe desirable :or :he orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. Thet the proposed ieclessification of subject p:operty does properly relate to the zones end their permitted
uses locally established In close proximity to subject property and to the zone, and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
4o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets becaL;.e said property does not relate to
or abut upon streets ~nd highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of
irafiic, wnich wiil be generated py ine permitted uses, 3n accurua~~ce ;~it~~ t;~e circ~ia~i~n
element of the General Plane
5. That the existing structure does comply with R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone
standards except that carports are being proposed instead of garages and that adequate trash
storage areas are not providedo
5: Tha± no ene appea*ed ir. on~os;tion to subj~ct•netitiono •
Rl-A -I-
• ~ ~° :~~ '~ ~~
.~'
I •.
_ -~;
„'~i ~~E
`v
RESOLUTION N0. 970, SERfES ly(i3-(i4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITIO~T FOR,RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-57 gE APPROVED
14FiEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did cecelve a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom DAVID Wo HOOK~ RONkLD Ao KAROS~ ROBERT P~ GILLMAN, ar.d GUSTAFF T. ERICKSON~
1780 4Yest:Lincoln Avenue, Suite H, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain real property
situated in the Cit~ of Anaheir~i, County of Orange, State of California, described as
Parcel 1, the Easterly 551o3Q feet of the North half o£ Lot 2, es shown on a Record of
Suruey of part of Section 4, Township 4 South,~Range 10 West, So Bo Bo 8 Me, filed in
Book.l, page 55 of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange
County, California, excepting therefrom the South 27o0Q.feet; Parcel 2, an Easement for
ingress and eyress over the South 30000 feet of the North 50000 feet of the North half
of.Loi: 2, as shown on a Record of Survey of.part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10
West, So Bo ~, 8 M., filed in Book 1, page 55.of Record of Surveys in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the Easterly 551030 feet,
and further described as 1144 North Euclid Stree~, Anaheim, California
end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissioe did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Meheim oa
November 27 ~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hesring having been duly given as cequiced by
law and in acco:denoe with the provisions of the Anaheim Mualclpal Code, Chepter 18.72, to heax and consider evidemce
for end against said pPoposed reclassificution end to investigate ertd make findings and cecommenda4ions in connection
therewith; and
WFiEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself end in its behalf, and
efter due rnnsideretion of ell evidence and reports offeced et said hearing, does find and determine the follo.wing facts:
1. That the petitloner proposes_a reclassificetion of the ebove desccibed property from the R-A~ Resi.dential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one-story
multiple family planned residential development with carportse
2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject pcoperty is necessery end/or desirable for the ocderly and pro-
per development of the community.
' 3. That the proposed reclessiflcation of subject pcoperty does properly celate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject~pcoperty and to the zones and their permitted uses genecelly esteb-
t•e~;va .u.~.. ~,,..,~ ~w~~ ~:~..
-- - • °'_-•-° - -----~ +
4a That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does not relate to
or abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of
traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation
element of the General Plan.
5. Thai ihe exisiing siruc~ux•e ~oes cc~~~ply uit}7 R".~iy °AUltiplc Family R~s:~?e.^.tial; ~one
standards except that carports are being proposed instead of garages and tha~ adequate trash
storage areas are not providedo
6a That no one appeared in opposition to subject~petitiono •
Rl-A
-1-
;
1 ~
3 ~
s
; ~
:,
~,~
" v
_ ___._-._---~Y
.
~
i o ''•
x
~~
~ -1~' '~~ ,~ ~-_•!
.-, _..v;:,
A~
>~~;
~~b
~
NOW, THEREFORE, EE ?T RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Flenniag Commission does hereby eecommend
to the City Cour.cil of the C:ty of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclessification be approved end, by so doing,
thet Title lit-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above descdbed pmperty from ti~e
R=A, Residential Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the
R-3, Multiple Family.Residential,.Zone, upon the.following conditions which are hereby
found to be.a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to
preserve 'the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheimo
-1~ That the completion of these reclassifical:ion proceedings is contingent upon the
granting of a Conditional Use Permito
2. That an irrevocable easement granting access from subject property across the abutting
property to the west,fronting on Euclid Street, shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Attorney's office prior to reclassificat3on of subject propertyo
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 6 of December' 19630
_n
i ~
, CHALRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMIYISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLA.NNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ . Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do he:eby certify thet the fore-
:.,e ...~„i~-;nn was nessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
e=-••e --
November 27~ 1963~ et 2:40 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Mungali, Pebley, Sidesa
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Gauer, Rowlando
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: perryo
. n~.~rp;wCS` IWG`pFQF i hnae hereunto set my hend this 6th day of DeCembeT~ 19b3o
u~ na.
-~~~/ / !/I' v -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 970
R2-A
-2-
' ~
,~
i ';
~
5 ~
. r
.~ A
f ~
1f
S
;t
.ra