PC 1963-1964-975,, ._.__
,~
~'6" .
n
r:
s:
i.
i
i,
~~
1.
. i ~' ;~ ;:~, ~~: ~ •
; .. .. ~_..,
_.. . ,,..~ ;: ..~ ;
__ _ _ - ------:.._._.__.:~_,... , ,~. :,. ;>.,., ,,. . , - - _. . _..__.._
~ i ~ ;!~:
"' • ~ .
RESOLUTION-NO. 975, SERIES 1963-64 . _
A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PLr'+NNING COMMIS^~ION OF THE CITY OF ANAH~IN
THAT PETITION FaR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. `.~Q BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plattning Commission of the City oE Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditionel
Use Pem~itfrom E. LEWIS.JQHNSON, 10230.Cole Road, Whittier, California; Ovmer; JOHN Ho GORMLEY,
1371 S. Walnut Street, La Habra, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the
Cii:y of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot Noe 9 of Tract
No. 3203, and further described as 1343-1345 South Los Angeles Street
. ' ; end
WHEF.EAS, the City Plannin~ Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City o: Anaheim on
November 27~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving beep duly given as required by
law and in eccordance with the proviaions of tha Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear and consider evidence
for and egainst aeid proposed conditionel use and to investigate and meke findings and recommendetlona in connection
therewith; snd • • '
WHEREAS, said Commisaion, efter due inspec¢ion, investigetion, end study made by itself and in ita behalf,
and efter due considetation of all evideaee and reports offe~ed at said heacing, does find and determiae the following facts: ~
;
1. Thet the proposed use ia peopetly one for which e Conditional Uae Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
establish a cocktail lounge ii~ conjunction with a restaurant on sub3ect property.
2. That the prooosed use is incompatible to the area in which it is proposed to be i
located.
3< That the prospective property owner, who also owns five buildings adjacent to f
subject property opposed the establishment of the proposed usee ~
4. That subject property is deed restricted to service station only, or any C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial, Zone use.
5. That the granting ~f the Conditional Use Permit, will be detrimental to the peace,
health, safety9 and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. '
6. Thai: one person appeared and a petition was received signed by twelve persons ;`
opposinq subject petitiono ~
-s
~~
, • ~
:
Cl-D . -1~
~
~
_._._. ~
a
~ __.._.._..._.~.,..__:.~..._....___.~_._
I `k
i ."~
t
i r
~.
k~ .
~
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Pienning Commission does hereby deny subject
PeHtioa for Conditioaal Use Permit on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me,this 6t/ h day of December, 19630
l-1
~ (~~1/
. • ~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G CCIMMISSION
ATTEST: .
~ I
! ~
j i ~
~ ' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~;
;' ; STATE OF CALIFOItNIA ) ;
~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ) j
5
I~ Ann Krebs ~~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Annheim, do hereby codit'y that the fore- i
~ going resolution wae pasaed an6 edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, h~lr1 ~,~
',~~ ivovember 27~ 1963~, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followi~g vote of the membe~ thereof:
i• ~
AYES: COMRiISSI0NER9: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Rowland, Sides. '
~' ' NOES: COMMISSiONERS: None. ~
1
'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Perryo
a,'~ '
,, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thie 6th day of December, 19630
i,~ , .
,'~ ~.~..~E,~
CYrncT~ov ~v~vcu~ ~ia a rLnpi~uvG ~;vM1171J~1UN
~ RESOLUTION NO. 975
i,1 ~ .
C2-D .~
r~ ~
;
i
3
'i
: :~
_.----- . .a
i
; }; ( - )