PC 1963-1964-982~, ~~"~..
,.; ~ ,)
;
RESOLUTION NO. 9$2• SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR,RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63-64-54 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e vedfied Petition for P~eclassifica-
tionfrom SATOSHI CY YUGUCHI and CECIL KEITH, 2810 West Redondo Beach Boulevard, Gardena,
California, Owners of certain xeal property situated ir, the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred
to herein as though set forth in full ,
; and
WFiEREAS, the City Plenning Commissiort did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
DeCember 9~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.hI. notice of seid public heering having been duly given es required by
law end in accocdence wi4h the provisions of Uie Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end ageinst said ptoposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and cecomm~endetions in connection
therewith; and .
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and.in its behelf, and
~ ~ a„ _.._~~ ~~ .._~ .e ..e „qse.a.t pr gw_ri ngaring; does find and determine the following , fects:
aIter tiue consid8rniivu vi a+ _.+ -~. •-r-•~- _
1. That the petitionec proposes e:eclassification of the ebove dzscribed property from the R-A~ Residential
Agr.icultural, Zone to the R-3,.Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one-story
multiple family planned residenti2l development with carportso
2. Thet the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desicable for the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
~ 3. That the proposed ceclassification of subject pcoperty does pmperly :elate to the zones end their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generelly estab-
liseed thmughout the community. ,
4, That the proposed reclsssification of subject p~operty does require dedication
for and standar~i improxement of abutting streets because said property does relate tn
and abut upon.streets..a~d highways.which axe.proposed to carry the type and quantity of
traffic, which will be generat.ed by the permitted uses, in accordance with the ci.xculation ^_
element of the ~ener2l P1an-
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject property.
Rl-A
-1-
~
A
~
~
a
~
,
i
~
i ~
...''~ .- --'--~
~_.
F
I
f
~ ~K ~~
v ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City P7aaning Commiseian does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim that subject Petition for Reclassificetion be appmved and, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude the above described propeety fmm the
R-A, Residential Agricuitural, Zone and to incorpor.ate said described property into the-
R-3, Multiple-Family Residen:ial, Zoney upon the following conditions which are hereby.
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheimo
lo That the owners of subject property shall deed to thP City of Anaheim a strip
of land 40 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along Winston Road for street
widening purposes, and the owners of subject property' shall also deed to the City of Anaheim
the.necessary street.dedication to insure a@0-foot property line radius on the cul-de-sac.
2o That the street improvement.plans shall.be prepared and ail.engineering requirements
of the City of Anahei.m along Winston Road, such' as curbs and gutters9 sidewalksy street
grading and paving, drainage facilities9 or nther appurtenant w~rk shall be comp~eted as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
•file i.n-the Office of the City Engineer, and that.a bond in an amount and form satisfactory
to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said
engineer.ing sE.quirementso
3o That the owners of subject property sha11 pay to the City of Maheim the Sum of
$2000 per fxont foot, along Winston Road, for street lighting purpose~.
Ae That the completion of these reclassification proce~dings is contingent upon the
granting of Conditional Use Permit Noa 496~
5o That..Condition Noso 1, 2, and 3y abo•ve mentioned, shall be complied with within a
period.of 180 days trom date hereofy or such further.time as the City Council may grante
6. That subject property shali be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Noso 1 and 2, provided t}iat
the westerly 21-foot drive shall be reduced to 9-feet, which 9-feet shall..be developed in
con~unction with an existing 21-foot drive orp the abutting property to the west, and that the
-remaining 12-feet snall be.utilized so as to.establish a 6-foot iandscaped setback of the ~
nronosed st.ructures from the easterly and westerly drives., /-'1
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by ~r t" 9 day of December, lyti:so
, CkAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANN COMMISSION
ATTESx:
1 ~C-~~i~YV ~~""~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHIISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~4NGE ) as~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr2bs ~ Secroiery oi f~~a .:.i.`y F:~u ;:~g ~c :::si~~:ca of the City of Anehelm, do 4ereby cectify tha! the fore-
going :esolution was peased and edopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Aneheim, held on
December 9~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by Llie following vote of the members thereof;
i,,YES: COMMISSIONERS: Alirs•,:, Gamp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Rowland, Sideso
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEPS: Pexryo
IN WfTNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hend this lpth day of December, 1963 0
,
, i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMiISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 982
R2-A
-2-,