PC 1963-1964-1026,~a, "~-
' ~ ' :~ e
`"::.
3';;'
> ;.
,~;~j ;;
:~
;,~ ~
~
~~
;:a i
RESO•:.UTiON N0. 1026, SERIES 1963=64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. ~ BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
UsePermitfcom SAMUEL FINK and JACK MESHEKOW, 1218 Sixth Street, Santa Monica, California,
Owners; DALE Ho HEINLY, P, Oe Box 927, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, Caunty of Oxange, State of California as described in
Exhibit '`A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth i,n full
; and
WHEF.Ee~S, the City Planning Commission did hold e oublic hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
January 20' 1964, et 7.:00 o'clock P.M., notice o: said public headng having been duly given as req~ured by
law end in accordence with the pmvisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18:64, to hear and consider avidence
for end against said ptoposed conditional use and to investigete and make findings end cecommendetions in connection
the:ewlth; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, inves2igetion, end study mede by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due considecation oi ell evideaca a;.d :agorts offe:ed et a~d hemring, does find and detecmine the followL~g fads:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
establish a restaurani ~r tavern serving wi~ie a~iu uee~•.
2. That the petiti.oner indicated at the public hearing that the proposed use was fo.r
the sale of bee.r and wine in conjunction with a restaurant.
3. That the proposed use is incompatible to the neighborhood Coimnercial uses established
adjacent to sub~ect property.
4. That the proposed use would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the community in which subject property is located.
5. That in the best intere~t of the area this should be maintained as neighborhood
commercial :oninq.without permitting uses filed through a petition for a conditional use
permit.
6. That f ive persons and one letter was received in opposi•tion to sub~ect pet3tion,~
Cl-D
-1-
, ......._._.. __
. ___-_.-,~._ ~.---------------- --------- --- - --- -------
. , ,
I ~ ~
_ - .--_.:__ _~ ' ~
...~w ~ ._...~_.
_ -~_ .. - - --° - ---`~._.... _ _ __. _ _.
__ _ -_ , ~~ .
s` ~ .
~v .a~'
v~
{
~..~~
~ n
' _
1 ...
~
6
~i r
i~ °
i ~ ~:
;y{ ~
~_ ~ k!
~!, {:
~
,~
y~ b.
:'~ '
PIOW,.THEREFORE, IiE IT RESOLVED that the Anarieim City Planning Commission doea hereby deny subject
Pe:i;ia.-. ;o: Ccn~::ior.al Use Permit o.^. the tes?s o# ih? aforementioned findings<
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sip,ned and epproved by me,this 30th day of January' 1964e
, ~~ i
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
`^~~/~(/!T/ /~1~%CifitG/
SECRET.IRY ANAIiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
S'Y'ATE OF CALIF'ORNIA )
COUNTY OF ARANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Sec:etery of the City Planning Commission oi the City of Anaheim, do hereby certi£y that the fore-
going resolution was pessed and adoptod at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anr~heim, hel~l on
January 20~ 1964~ , at 7:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membars the:eof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland,
Sideso
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: I~*one.
'ABSENT: COiVlMISSIONERS: None.
IDI WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of January~ 1964e
~~~ /,~_~~ .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CON!MfSSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1026
C2-D -~