PC 1963-1964-1028f .., ~ ... -.+ ~ ~ ~~ .
~ . ~...~ r~'.~ ~. ~ ~ ~.~~~~.
,r'C) ~ ~'~ ~'~~~,
. ~.
- _: ~ ... ~.,.:..~.:
~
i
r, i
';i ~
~.
`~
RESOLUTION NO. 1028, SERiES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CONMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMblENDIN~ TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR.RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63-64-73 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did recelve a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom HERMAN Ho BRUNS, 1102 5outh Los Angeles Streat, Anaheim, California, ONner;
WAHREN L...SCHUTZ,.306 United.Califnrnia Bank Building, Anaheim, California, Agent of
ceitain xeal property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Cal=fornia, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as
though set forth in full ~
; and
1 1
3 1
i_~~
WI-TEREAS, the Cit} Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City He11 in the City of Aneheim on
January 20t 1964~ at 7:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law end in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Cheptec 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
foi and against said pioposed reclassificetion end to investigete end make findings and recommendations in connection
ui2iewi'u`a~ @P~u
WFiEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behalf, and
after due rnnsideration of ell evidence and reports offered, at said hearing, does find end determine tiie following facts:
1. That the etitioner pmposes e reclessification of the ebove described property from the R-A~ Residential
Agricultural, ~one to the R-1, One Family Residential, Zone to divide subject property for
development with an additional residence on the northerly portiona
2. Thet the proposed reclassification of sub;eot p:ogerty is necesser• end/or desirable for thc o:de:ly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject pcoperty doe., aroperly relete to the zones and their pennitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property end co the zones end their permitted uses generally estab-
Iished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subj;~ct property does not require declication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said praperty does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated py the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plano
5. That no one appeared in oppos~i:ion to subject petition.
Rl-A -1-
~----- -----. ----- --- ------- -_ ------- ---
~ ---- .
, 1
~ ~'
-- , .
-_---,..._ ~.__~_-_•_ .--_ _.___----
' . h`.1_. _- _ -. . ._____- ~-_ " '
1 ~ :: ~ -
~ `.- . t
{ 'r" -
` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~
~.. -~- \ } i
`a
-...
t.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aaahc!m City P"enning Commission does heceby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet sebject F^titiutt f~r Reclassificetion be appcoved end, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described propecty from the
R-a, Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the
R-1, One-Family Residential, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hPreby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the propo=ed use of subject property in ordex• to preserve
the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the Cit~ of Anaheimo
la That sidewalks shall be installed alang West Street, as required by the City
Engineer and.in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer prior to final building inspectiono
2. That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property be
recorded in the office of tlie G_ange County Recorder.
3e That Condition Noo 2y above mentioned9'shall be complied with within a period
of 180 days from date herof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
4, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
•and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Nos~ 1 and 2".
'~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and app:oved by me this 30th ay of January, 19640
'I
}
~ ;,I
i~ i '
:I . CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMMISSION
,I V
ATTEST:
~;~~~~1%~/~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIIN CI'fY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~. Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going cesolutlon was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anehcim, held on
January 209 1904' at ~:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allredy Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungally Pebley, Perry, Rowland,
Sideso
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: COM6SISSIONERS: Noneo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of January9 1964 e
C/C'~ ~%~'~~.c~ri e/
SEGRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSdON
I RESOLUTION N0. 1028 '
' , ~ R2-A .Z_
_ ....__...__.__.._.__...
~ ~
?%i-i-- ___ . .._____.
,~
~
'z
.~
~
i
~
. ~
~
~
----~