PC 1963-1964-1079t•
i ~ ..
'_. ~.'
6>
l~. •
L,
4;
1,~i
P.ESOLUTION NO. 1079, SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMhIISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1b23 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e vedfied Petition for Vedence
from.: MlkRCUS A..GARTNER,. 1233 North Harbor.Boulevard9 Anaheim,. Calif~xnia,.Owner of certain
r.eal property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot Noo 8 oi Tract No. 530
; and
WHEREAS, the. City Planning Commission did hald a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on MarCh 2~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordence with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and considee
evidence for' and egeinst seid proposed variance and to inves~igete and meke findings end recommendations in connec-
tion the:ewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commisaion, after due inspection, investigat?on, and study made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports ofEeced as seid hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a varience from the Anaheim Municipel Code: SeCtion 18028.030(b) which
requires a 20.foot reai yard for subject property, 180800080, which requires that any single
family.dwelling..shaLl have a minimum of 1225 square feet, to permit the development of subject
property with a 17~ foot rear yardy a 19000 square foot bLilding, and the constr.uction of
a 704 square fooi, dwelling unit over a~three-car garagee
2. That there are exceptionel or extreordinery circumstences or conditions eppliceble to the property involved
or to the intanded uae of the p:operty that do not epply genecally to the pzopecty or class of use in the seme viciaity
and zone. ~
3. That the requested varience is necessery for the preservation end enjoyment of a subatential property right
posseased by other p:operty in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the p:aperty in question.
4. That the eequested varience will not be meterially detrimental to the public welEete or injurious to the pmp-
erty or impTOVements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is locetxd.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Vl-G -1-
~
~
~
x a
; ~
~
~S
1
'`
i
~ ~
.:~:
~ ~
~ ~
. , :_ ,
;~
_.~
`J
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petltion for Verience, upcn the following conditions which a:e hereby found to be a necessary pretequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pxoperty in order to preserve the sefety and general welface of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That .the damaged and~or hazardous sidewalks and curbs shall be repaired along
Sabina Street,.as..r.equixed by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specif ications on.file in the office of the City Engineer prior to final building inspection.
2. That the.owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00
per.dwelling.unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at
the time..the~building permit is issued.
3..That trash storage areas.shall be provided.in accordance.with approved plans on file
in the off ice Df the Dixector of Public Works, prior to final building inspection.
4..That ';he owner.of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim.the sum.of 15~
per front foot along Sabina Street, for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid at
the.time..the.building.permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof,
whichever occurs first.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file ivith the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Noo lo
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this~ ay cf March~ 1964.
i r
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING CONIMISSION
ATTEST:
/~~~'2k~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUIQTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery ef the City rlanning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hexeby certify thet the fo~e-
going resolution wae passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
March 2~ 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred, Camp, Chavos, M~~ngall, Rowland, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Pebley, Pezryo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 12t•h day of March~ 1964.
RESOLUTION N0. 1079
~ -•
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
y?_G .2-
i
s
fz