PC 1963-1964-1088~l
~--~
._,
RESOL'JTION l30._1088, Series 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAH~IM
REPETI IONFOR R CLASSI ICATION N1~U.F63~~4~97Y ~ gE APPROVED T
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City o: Anaheim did initiate a Petition for Reclassifica-
tion on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim; County of Orange, State of
California, described as Tract No. Hotel Del Campo and Lot No. 29-32 inclusive, and further
described as 406 and 412 South Kroeger 5treet.
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hell in the City of Anehelm on
- March 7.6~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given ae required•by
law end in accordence Nith the provisiorts of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for nad agalnst said ptoposed reclesaificetion and to inveatigate end make findings end eecommendetions in connection
therewith; and •
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, inveatigetion, c+nd study mede by itself and in its behelf, and
efter due consideration of ell evidence end :eports offeced et seid hearing, does Eind and determine the following facta:
Y. That the Canmissim proposes a reclassif ication of the above described property from the
R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to the P-1, Automobile Parking, Zone to permi~ the
establishment o£ a parking lot on subject property. .
2. That the proposed ieclessification of subject p:operty is necessary end/or desirable for the ocderly and pro-
pee development of the community.
3. That the pcoposed reclessification of subject prope~ty doea properly relate 4o the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject propecty und to the zones and their petmitted uses generelly esteb-
lishad throughout the community.
4. That the propose~ reciassification of subject property does not requirE dedication
fox and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be. generated by the permi.i:ted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of
the General Plan.
5. That although a masonry wall is not required by Code to separate industrial uses from
a parking~area, the close proximity of the industrial use tQ the east of the residential
characteristics oE Kroeger Street, necessitates the distinct separation of the two uses with
a 6-foot masonry wall placed along the east property line, and a 42-inch decorative wall to
protect the residents from the parking area and to improve the esthetic appearance of the
parking lot.
E. Th^t no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A "1'
. ~__.._. . ~ ,;. ,_
-• _......_. ------- - --_.. . . .._..__- ___..... _.___._ _.. . ..,..__.~_. ~__---- _ ,.
-- _._ ._ ... ._._~.__ .:__
.-~-~3 - -- ' _. __ _ . .
~
_ _., ~ ~ _~
~., ) l _
NC"•.', TH~'N?:~r~3RE, Fs~; IT RE50LVED tho.t the Ansheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
.. ;'+~ C:Y4s~ =:~"a':=i1 of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclessification be approved and, by so doing, ~
., ';.':tte 18-cc:i:~g of tne Aneheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude the ebove described property from the
4~~Fi-3, Multipl~ Family Residentiai, Zone, and to incorporate said described property in the
P-1, Automobile Parking, Zone, upon the following r,onditions which are hereby found to be a j
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject pr~perty in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
le That the cuxbs and damaged and~or hazardous sidewalks shall be removed and~or re-
constructed along Kroeger Street, as required by the City Engineer prior to final building ~
inspection. ~
2o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~
per front foot along Kroeger Street, for tree planting purposes; said amount to be paid at
the time.the building permit 3s issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, which-
ever occurs first.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the adopted .
off-street parking req~~iremtni: standards, and further that it shall be developed in accordance
With.the generaJ Nrovisions of the requirements of Section 1800400300 -
4. That~a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the north and east boundaries of
sub~ect property said wall to be constructed within 180 days from date hereof. ,
5. That a~}2-inch decorative masonry wall shall be constructed on the west property line
immediately behind a 3-foot strip of landscaping9 said wall to be constructed within 180 days
from date hereof. ~
6~ That s 3-£oot strip of land shall be landscaped on the Kroeger Street frontage and
said landscaping maintained; that plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved ';
by the..Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and that said landscaping shall be installed
within 180 days £rom date hereof.
7..That any illumination of the parking area shall be provided by low mushr~~om lzght
standards with the illumination directed downward and away from the'residential development ~
adjacent to subject property, subject to the approval of the Cti~af Building Inspector. .
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 26th day of March~ 1964. +
1
/ ~ .
. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CIT7l PL G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY AN4HEIM CITY PLANNING CG~dMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I9 Ann KrEbs' Seccetery of the Ciry Planning Commiesion of the City of Anaheiro, do heieby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes pessed and adopted et e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, h3"_,'~ on
MaTCh 169 19649 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COn1MISSIONERS:~llred, Camp9 Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Sides.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand this 26th day of MarCh9 1964.
~.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM ~1TY PLANNIFTG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO.
R2-A -2-
;
i
i
i
i