PC 1963-1964-1090~.~~ :.
:rv;; --
'~~~
RL,'.
,L:
i.'...
'S:':.
t.
~i':.
r:
Yr['.
i,'.,
~.
_ _._ _ ~
t :1!
i ..,~
~
RE30LUTION N0. 1090, SBRTSS 1963-64
A RBSOLUTION OP THS CITY FLANKiNG COMMISSION OP THH CITY OF ANAHHIM
RHCOtdD'~BNDING TO THH CIiY COUNCIL OP THII CITY OP ANAHIiIM THAT
GHDIBAAL FLAN AA9HNDMHNT N0. 12 BH.APPROVHD
6~HEEtEtAS, the City Cc~uncil of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General
Plan by Reso3utior. N5. 63R-869, shawing the general description and extent ~f
land uses nr.it!zin .*.he City and indicating the presenfi belief of the Council as
to nossi5~~. futuxe development and redevelopment of land within the city; and
w:~tt&1S, tne City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did
rece•i•~e a verified Yetition for Variance No. 1626, which petition has implications
on policies as expressed on said General Plaa; and
WHffitHAS, in conjunction with the notice of the hearing on said variance,
notice was also given regarding the consideration of an amendment to the General
plan in the general iocation and vicinity of subject property of said variance;
and
WHHRBAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 16, 1964, at 2:00 P.M., notice of ss:d
public hearing having been d~ly given as reouired by law and in accordance with
the grovisions of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code, tu hear and consider evidence for
and against said amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for
Variance to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection there-
with; and
WHHRBAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation, and study
made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, DOES HffitBB7 PIND
1. That evidence was presented a•t said hearing which jnstifies the City
Planning Commission's recommending to the City Council a change.in
the present general description and extert o: land uses in the
aforementioned area.
2. That Hxhibit No. A of General Plan Amendment No. 12 does constitute ~~
an acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the
General Plan.
~
i ,~ ~ '~ .
,,
,
~.__---- -- -_ _ _ .
_ _ . ._
,
_---------
~
-_~
, ~~
:~.
~.
~ NOW, THF:RBPORE, BS IT RHSOLVHD that the City Planning Commission of f
T the City of Anaheim doss hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of
~ Anaheim that subject General Plan Amendment be approved on the basis of the
, aforementioned findings and in accordance, with Bxhibit No, A.
THB PORBGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 26th, day
of March, 1964.
.a • • '
CHAIRMAI~~~NAHEIM CI P NNING COMMISSION
ATTBST:
/~/Z~/1/l~ ~''z.fif/~G/
SBCRBTARY ANAHSIM ~~ITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
~u-~ GP lAl,IP~uti~ifn ) '
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHBIM ) . 'i
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Auaheim do ~
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting :
of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on March 16, 1964, !
at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followiag vote of the members thereof:
pYES: COMMISSIONffitS: Allred, Camp,Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland.
NOHS: COMMISSIONBRS: None~
ABSHNT: CObA1ISSI0NBR3: Sides.
IN WITNBSS WHHRHOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 26th, day of
Marclt 1964.
~~~ ~'~~~
SHCF.STARY ANAHEIM CIT'1 PLANNING COMMISSION „