Loading...
PC 1963-1964-1125~ f ~; ~, ~; '"' ~; ~ k , la That the present general description and extent of land uses in the aforementioned area9 generally bounded on the north by the filood Control Channel9 on the aast by Beach Boulevard9 on the south by Cerritos Avenue, and on the west by Western Avenue, does not adequately represent past and and current City policies reqarding possible future development uf said general areao 2~ That evidence was presented at said hearing which would ~ustify the City Planning Commission recommending a change in the above mentioned policies to the City Councilo 3o That Exhibit "A", "B", and "C" were considered but do not constitute an acceptable alternative, however, Exhibit "D" does constitute an accep•eable alternative to current policies as il'lustrated on the General Plan. i ; i , ..~~ i • f'! . ::i~; ~ -•~a,~ -~i .. .__ .,.;±.ri? l __~ _-,. ~_~ RESOLUTION NOo 1125. Series 1963-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING OOMMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REOJMMENDINI: TO THE CITY O~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT GETic^nAL PLAN AMINDMENT N0, 13 BE APPROVID WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General Plan by Resolution No. 63R-II69, shov~in.g the general description and extent of land uses within the City and indicatir.g the present belief of the Council as to possible future development and redevelopment of land within the City; and WHeREAS, the Citp Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verif ied Petitionsfor c~eclassification Noo 63-64-94 and Variance Noo 1628, which petitions have. implications on policies as expressed on said General Plan; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the notice of the hearing on said Reclassification and Variance, notice was also given regarding the consideration of an amendment to the General Plan in the general location and vicinity of subject property of said Reclassifi- cation and Variance; and WHFREAS, the City Planning Cc~mr~ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 13, 1964, at 2:00 o'clock PoMo, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for Reclassifidation and Variance to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewithg and WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf and after due.consideration of all evidence and •reports offered at said hearing, DOFS HEREBY FIND ~t i ~ rz .j ~ 3 ;~ % ,k , ~!1 ~ '; ~' ~r { --- v ! i , ~ r~ ~. ' . 1 _ ~. _.. ---' C. ~ ~: ~ ~~ r Y- 1: G. j;`:, rr ;i:. it 's; ~' NOW, THEREEORE' BE IT RES~LVID that the City Planning Commission of tha Cit; a. Anaheim dc~~ heraby r2cor~and to tha City Cauncil o; the Citv of Ts Anaheim that sub~ect General Plan Amendment No~ 13 be approved on the basis of the :~ aforementioned findings and in accordance, with Exhibit "D", {;,. Aprily 1964. ATf FST: 5~~~~ . SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING (AMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CAUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I9 Ann Krebs9 Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and ado~ted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 13, 1964, at 2s00 o'clock PoM,9 by the folluwing vote of the members thereofs AYESt CUMMISSIONERSs Allred, Camp, Gauer, Mungall, Perry, Rowland. NOfiSa COMMISSIONERSa ~havoso ABSENTs OOMMISSIONERSt.pebley9 Sides. Y IN WITNESS WHERH~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of April, 19640 Resolution Noo 1125 THE FORL~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23 day of ~ ~ i ' CHAI ANAHEIM CITY ANNING OOMMISSION Le~i!Z ~/!'~/ ~~~Y'e'C/~Q/ SECREI'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~MMI~SION ~ a 1 I 5 ~7 Y • iS ~.!r ;~ ~ij. : •f ;: J `:<i ,,:~