PC 1963-1964-1135~ `~ / ~
.
~ _ ... -~.~
~~
t,_~
RESOLUTION NOo 1135, Series 1963-64
A RES~LUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REOOMNiENDING TO THE CITY Q'iUNC2L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMF~IT I30, 17 BE APPROVID
WHEREAS, the City Council of tha City of :,naheim did adopt a General
Plan by Resolution Noo 63R-869, showing the general description and extent of
land uses within the City and ir•,dicating the present belief of +.he Council as
to possible future development and redevelopment of land within the City; and
WHEREAS9 the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did
receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit Noo 561, which petition
has implications on policies as expressed on sa3d Ueneral Plan; and
WHFRFAS, in con~unction with the notice of the hearing on said
Conditional Use Permit, notice was also given regarding the consideration of an
amendment to the General Plan in the general location and vicinity of subject
property of said Conditi~nal Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did holc~ a p~iblic hearing at tne
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 13, 19649 at 2a00 o'clock PaMo, notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by 1aw and in accordance
with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence
for and against saic~ amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for
Conditional Use Pexmit to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in
connection therewith; and
WHERFAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation, and study
made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered a~c said heari.ng, DOES HERESY FIND
lo Th:c the present general description ahd extent of land uses in the
aforementioned area generally bounded on the north by Crescent Avenue,
on the east by Brookhurst Street, on the south by the City Limits,
and on the wesi: by the golf course9 does not adequately represent past
and curreqt City policies regarding possible future development of
said general.area.
2. That evidence was presented at said hearing which would ~ustify the
City Planning Commission recommending a change in the above mentioned
policies to the Cii, Council.
;
~
'_
i
3,. That Exhibit No. A of General Plan Amendment Noo 17 does constitute an
acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the General
Plan. -
.
1:;';
,~;;
,.•.--=?T;.:~;,
__. .,r;;a
. i .
<
. ' :~ - ~ ~~. ~ ~
~ _~, .
~
i~~~ ~,_.%
;
NOW~ THEREE~OREy BE IT RE90LVID that the City Planning Commission of `
th~ C?~ty of Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of ;~
Anaheim that subject General Plan Amendment Noo 17 be approved on the basis o: ~:h2 ;
aforementioned findings and in accordance, with Exhibit Ao
THE FORECOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day ;
of April, 19640 !
~
~
, ~
CHAIRMAN,ANAHEIM CI PLANNING OOMMISSIUN
ATTESTs
SECRETARY ANAHEIM ITY PLANNING ODMAIISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ;
OpUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ;
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plat7ning Co~~rission o: the City of Anaheim do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on April 13, 1964,
at 2:00 o'clock P,.Mo9 by the following vote of the membe.rs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSa Allred, Camp, Gauer, Mungall, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOES COMMISSIONERSs None.
ABSI-SITs COMMISSIONF135a Chavos, Pebley.
IN WITNESS WHERBJF9 I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of April, 1964.
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING GOMMISSION
i
i
1
S
~
Resel~!±ior. No: 1735
~
;, ~
~ ,~
L
, `
,
'
~ ~
~
i
''i, ~
>;.i
:;~:--