PC 1963-1964-1175~'~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. 1175, SERIES 1963-64
A RESOY.UTTON OF TTiE CITY PLANNIhG COM:.IISSION OF THE CITY OF /~NAHEIM
RECOMMENAING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM :iHAT
PE 111ION FOR RECLASSIFTCAT?QPI D(Q. _ 63-64-~ 2Q BE BEp:IiO
iUHEREAS, the CiCy Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim 3id receive a verified Fst~tion for Recla'ssifice-
tionfrom OWEN B, AND ROSE MARIE LAMPMpN AND WILLIAM Bo AND WANEVA HaRRIS~ 1243 Eastridge,
Whittier, California, Owners; JOHN r, HARVEy, III, Rimel 8 Harvey, 4th'Floor, U,G.B. Bldg.,
1010 North Main Street, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, describ;d as Lot Noso 76, 77,
78, and 79 of Tract No. 1808
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of qnaheim on
May 25~ 1964, et 2:00 o'cIock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as requiced
by law and in accordence with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72,to heer and consider evi-
dence for and against seid propo~ed reclecsificetion and to investigate end meke findings and recommendations in
connectian therewith: and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and a£tee-due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
facts: ,
1. Thet the etitioner proposea a reclassification of the ebove described property from the R-],~ Qne Family
Residential, ~ne to the C-1, Neighborhood Comrnercialy Zone to establ?sh a service station
and_small.off3ce.building,
.2e That the proposed reclassification and use would be incompatible to the residential
integrity of .the.single famiiy subdivision in which subject property is locateda
3o That tihe propoced.xeclassification of ~abject prop~rty is not necessary ond/or
des.9rable.for the..oxderly and proper development of the community.
4o That two persons appeared one of. whom represented six persons present_in the Council
Chamber and who also presented a petition signed by 40 property owners, opposing sub3ect
petitiono
~ ~.! . . ~ 1
l
a
4 ~, ~ ~,._' ~ r ~~:~ ~ '~~_
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the AnaheIm City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclessi~ication be denied on the besis of the
aforementioned findings.
~ ..._.•~~-^
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epp:oved by me this 4 of June~ 19640
~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMM?S';ION
ATTEST:
~ ,~
SECRETARY ANAHFIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
Iy Ann Krebs~ , Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going cesolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
MAy 259 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote o: the niembe:s thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allredy Camp9 Chavos9 Gauer, Munga119 Perry, Rowlando
NOES: COMMISSIOIdERS: Notteo
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: pebleyo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto ~et my hend this 4th day of June~ 19_640 .
RESOLUTION N0. 1175
R2-D
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
`
i
s
"~
;i
~'1~1: .___'
~