PC 1963-1964-1183., r `
' f \f
~ RESOLUTION N0. 1183. SERIES 1963-64
A RFa'~i.UTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIDI
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THA.T
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. - 63-64-105 gE pppgOVED
__ _ _ _.
S
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive a ved8ed PeUtion for Reclaeaifice-
c~~' tionfrom JOHN NUN£MANN, 419 East Orangewood, Anaheim, California, Owner; J. & B. DEI-ELOPMENT
COMPANY, P. O, Box 3366~ Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in
~~ the City af Anaheims Co~nt! of Q:aage, State of California, de~cribed as tha ~:o~t half a;
e. the South half of the West half o,f the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section
t; 26, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa Ana;•as•shown
;~ on a map thereo,f recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plan~ing Commission did hold e publi~ headng at the City Hall in the City of Meheim on
June 8~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given ea requlced .by
law end in eccordence with the provIsIons of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to heai ead coneider evideace
for and ageinst said pPOposed reclassification and to investigate and make findinga end recommmdetiona in rnneectioa
therewith; end
WfiEREAS, said Commission, after due inapection, investigetion, end study made by itaelf and in ite behelf, end
efter due consideration of all evidrnce and reporta ofEered et seid hearing, does find end detetmine the following facta:
1. Thet the petiUoner proposes a reclessification of the above described properry from theR-Ay Residentiai
Agr.icultural9 Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a.one aad two
stury multiple family devel.opmento
2o That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plana
3° That the proposed mclassification oE aubject property is necessery and/or desiceb2e for the orderly end pro-
per development of the wmmunity.
~a Thet the proposed reclessificetion of subject proFetty dues propecly relate to tho zones aad .their pecmitted
nsea locally esteblished in close proximity to aubject propedy and to the zones end their peimitted uses genetelly estab-
lished throughout the community.
5o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard...impxouement of abutting streets because said pxoperty does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity.of traffic,
which will be.gener.ated by the pexmitted uses, in accordance with the circulation elemPnt
of the General Plano .,,
6o That no one appeared in opposition to subjec~t petitiana
Rl-A
_1. , ..
~ , ,. ,. ; `
,-,,:. ..,,.: .._ ,,.:... r__..__ _
L ~ .
~
'
~
~ i ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does heceby :ecommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Recles~ification be approved end, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the above described property from the
R-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the
R-3, inuitiipie-Family Residential, Zone, upo~ tha :olloaing conditions e:hich are h~reb~
found to be a necessary.preTequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheima
le That Pearson.Avenue shall be continued-and connected to provide proper %raffic circula-'
tione " •
2o That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and record-
ed ln the office of the Orange County Recordero
3o That the completion of these reclassification proce=dings is contingent upon the
granting of Conditional, Use Permit Noo 560a
4o That the vehicular access rights,. except at street and~or alley openings, to
Orangewood Avenue shall be dedicated to i,he City of Anaheimo'
5a That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
,specifications on f ile with the City of Maheim, marked Revision Noa 1, Exhibit Nos, 1 through !
7, provided that Parcel "B" be developed with a.maximum of 36 dwelling units per net residerrtial!
acre, a.maximum coverage of 55~, and rF~vised elevations, and further provided that'said plans
and elevations shall be submitted to and approved by Development Review prior to issuance of
a building permito
. i
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day of June~ 19640
i ~ ~ .
• . CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION ~
ATTEST: ' .
- - - - - -- - ~~~ c'4~ --- _ _.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) •
COUNTY CF 0:~~1NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) • ,
I~ Ann i:rebs ~. Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby cecti£y thet the fo:e-
going :esolution was passed and odopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, held on
Jtine 8~ 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allredy Camp9 Chavos9 Mungall, Perry, Rowland>
NOES: CONfMISSIONERS: Nonea +
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Gauero !
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hend tais lSth day of June~ 19640
i
i
,
• SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION
RESOLUTEON NO. 1183 '
R2-A -2-
.. , ~ 9
;I
1
~
:a'
i
. , ' -~:.,.E