PC 1963-1964-1220~
~;.
Ji'. ,> ~~., .w~..~.,.~„k~„~..._... ~_.._.____ _
t.
~ ~~\ ~~
~ ~ .
~.l ^ .. . ~" '~ . ,
J
RESOLUTION ;3~. 1220, SERIES 1963-64
, _
i
A RESQLUTION OF THE CITY FLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDYNG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63- 4-143 gg pppROVED
~
3
8
:i
r"r,, ~ ~ ~
, .~
WHEREAS, the City Plennieg Commisaion of the City of Maiieim did receive e veriEied Petition for Reclnasifice-
tionfrom ALAN R. AND MARJORIE S. TALT~ 1695 West Crescent, Suite 560, Anaheim, California,
O.vners~ ROBERT Wo MAC MAHON, 1695 WRSt Crescent, Suite 560, Anaheim, California, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County nf Orange, State of California,
a's described in Exhibit "A': attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in
full
~:. `.,
; ead
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hoEd a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Maheim on
June 22~ I964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly giv~ as required by
law end in eccotdence with the provlsioas of the Mahdm Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evIdence
for and egainst seid ptoposed reclasaificeUon end to Investigate and meke Radings end recommendatlone.la conaection.
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commiesion, aEtet due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itaelf and ia its behalf, and
efter due cansi~e~ation of all evidence and repocta offeced at seid 6eedng, does find and determine the following feMa:
1. Thet the petitloner proposes a reclaseiflca!+on of the ebove descdbed propesty fiom the R-09 One Family
Suk~urban, Zone ta the.R-3, Multiple.Family Residential, Zone ta estahlish a one aacl two story
multiple family developmento
2o That the proposed reclassification is considered in con3unction with Generai Plan
Amendment Noo 250
3• That the proposed reclessl$cation of subJect property is necesaery end/or desirable tor the orderly and pro-
per development oE the commuc~Iry. . ~
4^ That the ptoposed roclaseification of subject property docs properly relete to the zonea end their pe,mitted
uses locelly estabiished in close proxlmiry .to eubject property en~ to the zones end theiv peimltted qses genetally e~teb-
Iiahed throughout the community. •
5o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dsdication
for and.standa•rd..improvement of.abutting streets.because said preperty doec relate to
and abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type 3nd quantity of
traffic, which v~ill be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance H~ith the r,irculation.
element of the General Plana
6a That no one appeared in oppositiun ~to sub~ect petitiono
RI-A
. a:
~
F;
n ~'
'
~,, ;
?;I .
,~:. ,
?rs'4
u~~:
~;•; .
.,~--..
___ : .-,
:F,~;~;,
-1-
!,
f
.9
.
s
~
~
~ ~~~ 4...
~ I - ... _ ..
O ~~~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
_~ ~
O~- ~ .
THAT PORTION OF L.OT 8 OF TNE ANAHEIM HOMESTEAD TRACT~ IN .~
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ COUN1"Y OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~• i
A3 PER MAP RECOROEO IN BOOK 2E>~ PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS i
RCCORDS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COI;NTY RECORDER OF L03 ANGELES
COUNTY~ CqLIFORNiA~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLO4lSt
BEGINNING AT THE INTER3ECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT
WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BEVERLEY ORIVE~ 50.00 FEET IN
. WlDTH~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT N0. ~83~~ RECORDED IN BOOK
'S1~ PAf3E 29 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ RECOR~S OF SAlD COUNTY OF ~
ORANOE• THENCE NORTH 79~43~04" YlEST~ ALONG SA10 NORTHERLY
LINE~ ~05.82 FEET~ THENCC SOUTH 89~4~~1i5° WE3T~ ALONG SA10
NORTHERLV LINE AND 17S ~'~ES7ERLY PROLONGATION 282.~F5 FEET 70
7HE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT~ SA10 NJES7 LINE BEING THE CENTER~
LINE OF LOARA STREET; THENCE NORTH 0~1(~s,~j„ WEST~ ALONG SAID
WE3T IINE AND SAID CENTERLINE~ 1~1i.27 FEET TO A LINE MEASURED
AT R14HT ANGLES 70 THE CENTERLINE OF LOARA STREET AND OISTANT
juu7iti v=io~jj° cn~T~ Yv~.go FEET MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER~
LINE OF SA10 LOARA STREET FROM 7HE CENTERLINE OF WESTMONT '
OR 1 VE; THENCE NORTH ~S9°1F3 ~OS" EAST ~ ALONG SA 1 D L 1 NE ~ 3'19 •~'5
• FEET TO THE,EpST LINE OF SA10 LO7; 7HENCE SOUTH 3~'I7~25~~
'~AST~ ALONQ SAID W6ST LINE~ 133•91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BE4INNINO. '
e ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~~. ~~~
" (~ ~-
~'~~~PS~~ N0. . ~
' SUBJECT~ HOWEVER~ TO A RESTRICTION THA7 NO BUILDlNO SHALL
~. BE CONSTRUC7E0 ON THIS PROPER7V OF MORE TNAN TWO STORIE$
~~1M HEIGHT. ~
. JUNE 5~ ~96~ 1.i~11~~~T ~t f~»
.~~~~.
• NAT NEFF ENGINEERING COMPANY
' ' . •"._l . ,
/
. _i .l~,~
g y /`~ l~l~c~o ~,~-
AY/ ERCADO . . 2 ~ •
, ~
;~ ~ . ~ I
z~ ~
. . . ,
,
-::~ ,,
,
~ ~--- _ . _ . . ~ ~
___..._:..__. __ . -- _. ._ .. ~
~
~ .
~ `~ ~ ~
,,:~., ~
~` NOW, TEIEREFORE, ~E 11' RESOLVED . t6at the Andheim C:ity Pl~euio~ Coma-iaeioa daea heceby tacommend: ~~
~~ to tfia CiEy :Couadl 08 the Citg!; of •Aaeheira thet sub)act Petitioa for FPealwssl6caUoa ios app~oved ond, bq so.~lii~;' i
tnet tit~e lis-conm oi tne naaeram niunicspai t',ode.be ameadea io e:einde wa aoove descricaa '
8. . pidpciiy cavm'snv
R-~, One-F.amily Suburban,.Zon~~'and to.incorporate said described prop'erty into the R-3, i
~; Multiple-Family Residential, Zone., upon the following conditions wliich ere heieby found ~
to be a necessary prerequisite to the.proposed use of subject propeity in order to preserve ~
th'e safety and general ~aelfare of ttie ci'cizens of the Ci.ty of Anah2im. j..
lo That.the:owners of subject pr.operty shall pay to the City of Anaheim`.the sum of 15~ i
pex..fr.or.t.:foot along Loara Stxeet for tr.ee planting .purposes, which .shall be compli.ed with ~.
~` rior„to .the.:time.that the Baildin `Permit.is issued or within a !
; P g peiiod of 180 days from da{:e ~
herenf:y which'eveT..occurs fir~t,.or•such,furthei ~time as the the City Council may granto ^
~ '',.2a That the..~nmpletion ~f these reclassii':~.cation proceedings is contingent upon the ?
grent:ing of Variance No'~.1644a : ; `. 3
~~ 3b That sub,ject.proper.ty.stiall be.developed substantially:in accordance•with p3ans and ~
_. specificatiun~...om f31e with the City of .Maheim, marked Exhibit .Noso 1 through 3~ r
'~ 4o That a 6-foot fiasonr wall,shall be canstructed alon the north and ea.,t
.~.:,:;~ , Y . g ° property lines ~
prior to final building in'spectiono
THE FOREG~IING RESOLUTIOId is signcd and approved by me this 2 of July, 19640
~
, runmueN ~x~u~~ ~t~gg.p . tnrr. r_neeurcctn~r
~-•-•-•- ------------
s
~ ~~4..-
~
~. `
t;:;1~
A7CTFST:
SECR~TARY APTAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAT~ OF CALIFORNL+- )
Ca1lJYTY GF OR~IPTGE .) ssr
CTI'Y ~? t~.NAHEIM : )
I~ Ann, Krebs ~, Secretery o~ the C~4y Planning Comm3ssIon of Lhe Ctty of Anaheim, do hereby cectlty that the foca
gnIng resolution was paaeed and adoptad et n meetine of 4he City Planning Commiseion nf the City of Anaheim, held on
June 229 1964~ •c2 2:p0 o'clock, P.M.,.by the following vote of the membera thezeof: '
AYE~: COMMISSIONERS: Camp9 Chavosg..Mungall, Perry~
N~JES: COMMISSEQNERS: 8owlando
AHSEN'F: GOMMISSIONERS: Allred; Gauero '
IN PrITNFSS WHEREOF, I he~e hoceunto aet my hand this 2nd day of July~ 19640
. . ~~~~~~, , i
~/~/v~/Lt~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEtId CITY.PLANNING COMblISSION
RESOLG°'TIGN PIO. 1220 ' ~
R2-A . _2_
. ;
, , . .. . . .. . . ~' • ~;' . . .
. .. ~ W...-~.~~..........._:..._,~ ~___" __"-„- -._.'".'"___ ~_._._-_.._.._ ......:-.:..~.~....~.:_~..~~ ' ""
"__"
.....-:~_.+_. .... : .: _ .
~ .
, .. ._•._ _._. . ., r.. `r ._i..~,~~.~
_ _ __ --_ -.l . . .. . . . _ . .
~ ~
.~~
j I
-- ~