Loading...
PC 1964-1965-1327. ~.. ~~ rt .~ ~~'~~: ~' ~ ~., . ,,~I? ~~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 1327, SERIES 1964-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOI~ENDING TO TH£ CITY COUNCIL OF THF CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-92 BE DENIED WHEREAS. the City Plenniag Commission of the City of Aaaheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Reclessiflce- tion initiated by the Anahelm ::ity Council, 204 East Lincoln Avenue~ Anaheim~ California, on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Gounty of Orange~ State of Cali- fornia~ as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full • Property owned by+ Lillicrop Private School, Attention: Mr. Anderson~ 2885 Weat Ball Road~ Anaheim, California~ IKre Wm. Dittmar, 290i West Ball Road~ Anaheim, California~ Alyd Steve Cannon~ 2863 West-~ei1 Road, Anaheim, California~ and Mre P. Scott, 2823 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California. ~ 811a WHFREAS, the City Planniag Commisnloa did hold n public hearL-g at Ute City Hall in the City of qnaheim on September 14~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of aeid publlc hearing heviag been duly given as requirod by law aad ia accoedaace aith the provisioas of the Aaahetm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear ead ~roasider ev!- dence for aad ageinat aaid proposed cedaseiflcatloa aad to investigate aad meke findings and recommendetioas in connection ffierewith: and qiHEREAS, eaid Commiasion, eRer due inapectioa, iavesUgatlon, and study mnde by itself and ia its behalf, and after due consideretion of ell evidmce and repoRs offered at eaid headng, does Snd and determine the folloaing faMs: 1. Thatthe petition as initiated by the City Council propo~o: ~ reclassification of the above described property from the R-AQ Residential Agricultural, Zon~~ to the R-3, Idultiple Famiiy Residential9~Zoaeo 2. That the pxoposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plan. 3o That Area Devslopment Plan No. 4 illustrates a feasffile means of providing adequate , circulation for subject propertiesa " ~' ~"` 4. That the.owners.of sub ect ,,~.,,,, j properties objected to having their property reclasa~= ~ fied, and r.equested.that the.existirag zoning remain, although they were aware that the sonittg action rrould only be complete upon co~;~ing with canditionso ~~ 5. That three persons appeared "iri°%opposition, one of whom represented two other propert thvnerir . ; r, a a ~ $ 7 P r S ~ T ~ i % ~ ~ . ~ . ••? t ; i ~ t 1 ~ i Y Rl-D -1- f ~.-..... . ..~.w,"~ ~_._.. \ N ~ Legal Description of proposed Reclassification of the area located at the North side of Ball Road, West of Dale Avenue= T ^'~'~' cc » E~~~.~.~ .~ Yhat portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes~ as ehown on a l~a recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous ~laps~ records of Orange County~ California~ described as followss ~ Beginning at a point in the 5outherly line of said Section 13~ distant Sauth 89° 59' 15" West 817.10 feet frem the Southeast corner of said Southwest quarter, said corner, for the purpose of this description being t3~e centerline intersection of Bal: Road and ~ Da1e Avenue; thence North 0° 09' 30" East along a line parallel with the centerline ~ of said Dale Avenue, a distance of 279.95 feet to an intersection with the South line ot ~ Lot 36 of Tract No. 2228, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 69, pages 34 to 37, ~ inclusive, of Miecellane~us lYiaps, records of Orange County, Californiaf thence South 89° 59' 26" West along a portion of the South line of said Lot 36 and along the South line of Lots 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27 and a portion of'~he South line of Lot 26 af said Tract 2228, a distance ef 703 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of Lot 24 of said Tract No. 2228; thence South 0° 10' 00" West 280.01 feet along the East ~ line of said Lot 24, and the East line of Lots 23, 22 and the Southerly prolangation thereof to ~the center line of said Ball Road; thence North 89° 59' 15" East along the centex lin~3 of said Ball•Road, 703 foet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom any portion thereof lying within Ball Road (53 feet, half street width). 63.Gy•q~. i .. ~~ ~ V ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aaeheim City Pleneiag Commisaion does hereby recommead to the City Couacil of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition for Reclasai~ceUoa be denied on the besis of the aforemeationed findiaga. THE FOREGOIIVG RESOLUTION is sigaed and appmved by me this 24th day Of Sept~amber~ 1964. CHpiRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI PRO TEM ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COARMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) cecr.uT~ e~ ep.~H~F ) 86, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs s Secretery oE the City Planning Commiesioa of the City of Maheim, do heceby certify that the fore- going resolution was passed and adopted at e meetiaQ of ffie City Pleaniag Commiseion of the City of Aaaheim, held oa September 14~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membezs thereof: AYES: COI~ISSIONERS: ulred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Perry, Rowland. NOES: COMblISSIONERS: ~1one+ ABSENT: COII~ISSIONERS: b~9alla Ifi WITDtESS WHEREOF, I have herenato set my hand tnis 24th day of September, 1964. ~~/" w~~~ SECRETARY ANAHELN CITY PLANNIIdG CObflNISSION RESOLUTION N0. 1327 R2-D -~- ~ .~ ~ i i !