PC 1964-1965-1341~.;. ~ •'
l }.
~~
R$SOLUTION-N0. 1342, SERIES 1964-65 __
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY PLANNINQ CO11lI~.YSION OF THE CITY OF ANAH~DH
THAT PETiTlON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PER~IlT N0. Is2(i BE GRAI~iI'ED
i:_~
A~~EREAS. tbe CitY pl~main~ Commission of the Gity of An~heim did •ii~itiate~ a verified Petition
far•:Conditional Use Permit on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
Courity of Orange, State of California, ++escribed as the Northsrly 182.13 feet of
the Easterly 131.15 feet of the Northeast quarter of the i~ortheast .~uarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the City of
Anaheim, as shown on a Map thereof recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellsneous
blaps~ records of Orange County, California~ Excepting that portion lying within the
right of way of Ball Road and Magnolia Avenue as described in deed recorded February
28, 1461 in Book 5642, page 322 of Official Records of Orange County, California.
Property ormed bye Wiltower Properties, Incorporated
1010 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California.
' ; :ad
WEiEF.EAS. the qtq Pl~mnina Commia~lon did hold a pnblic heaing at the Citq Hdl in the City of Anaheim oa
Septen~uer 14~ 1964~ ~t 2:00 o'dock P.M., notice of said pnbSc 6eariag haviag beep dnly gtven u required by
l.aw aad ih acoordwce with the proviaions of ths An~heim binnidpal Code, Ch~pter 18,64, to heer and coneider evtdence
for aad ~Qatast sdd pcoposed wadi8on~1 nse ~nd to investipte ~nd m~1ce flndin~s aad reoommeadaUoa~ la connection
~,i therewith; aed
~c WHEREAS, eaid Commissioc~ ~Eter dne lnspectioa, laneetigatioa, and study made by Itsrlf and ia its bebilf.
~,: aad aRer dne considention of all evidence ~nd npods offered at sdd headaa, does gad end deteimine the 6ollowiag fxt~ '
r ~ 1. Thet the •Propoaed use is properly one for which ~~i dit3dttal. UsMl~lrmit is authorized
:},~,~1j' ~by ti~is Cpde9 to wits Establish an existing service stat3~R as a conforming use in the G1,
,;~:~.;;; Neighborhood Co~nercial, Zone within 75 feet•~of a single family residrnce.
2. That the granting of the ConditicYS~l iJse Permit under the caaditions imposed,
~if any, will not be detrimental to the peaca, htalth, safety, and general welfare af the
Citizens of thQ City of M.iheim.
3. That the existing use was eatablishe~ under Reclassification No. 59-60-95.
4. That or.e one appeared.in opposition to sub~ect petition.
Cl-~1's'., .i.
I
NON, 1HERBFORE, BE IT RESOL'VED th~t th~ Anahelm City Pl~nnin` Commissiaa does 6eeebg gnnt wbiect
P~tition tor Canditbnal Us. Peemit, unconditionally.
,
THE 1*OREWII~id RESOLU'fION L~ipied ~od ~ppowd by m~ t6is 24th day pf S~ptsmbez, 17f:f, I
ATfES1':
/ •
S .~R~A~ ~~~ ~ ~~~d ~~~
STATE OF CAI.IFORMA )
COUNTY OF ORAN(3E ) u.
C1TY OF ANAHE01 )
.~a~r~p ~~~ .
CElAIItYAN ANAHE01 CITY P7.ApF"iL\~ ?'t71WLSSTON ,~
P(~ T9A
!
7
• ~
. ~
I~ Al~q Krebs~ . S~aehry of th~ Citr Plmdn~ Caaa;s~ion af tbe Cit~r of Aa~helm, do 6eeebq csdify th~t the
fors'ola` eewlutlan w~s pns~d ~od ~dapNd ~t •~~ttai ~E tltv Cihr PLaala~ Cammhdon oE t6~ Clt~r of An~heim,
6eld aa Sopt~mb~r 14~ 1964~ ~t 2:00 o'clodc P.1~., by tbe Iollowln~ voM oi t6e m~mb~a tberwk
AYES: COIOILSSlONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, P~rry. ~
NOES: COiOQSSIONERS:._~Sx~, s
ABSENI': COIO~SSIONER3: ~9811, Rowland. ~
~
W wl'TNESS iHERBOF. I k.svab~rm~oW pt e~ 6~ad this 24th day of Sopt~mb~r~ 1964. j
• L ~I~l~i'2%J'(/
~ SECRETARY AI(AHEO( CTfY PLANNIIdG COMMISSION ,
, ~
ItESOWT[ON NO. 1341
C?rG -~