PC 1964-1965-1362.~ • :~ ~' ~
RESOLUTION-N0. 1362, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTfY PLANNING COO~QSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. b2ZBE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Gty Pl~nnia6 Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verl8ed Petitlon for Coaditional
Uee Peem;tEcom PAULINE AND LLOYD R. PHTTENGIL~ 1564 Tonia Lane, Anaheim~ California~ Amerss
MICHAEL CORLEY, 4833 Fruitiand Avenue, Vernon, California~ Agent of certain real property
situatad in the Cit; of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as the
North 100v00 feet of the West 173a60 feet of the North 10.00 acres of the South 20v00 acres
of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21~ Tormship 4 South, Range 10
West~ as per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the
county recorder of said coanty '
; and
WHEREAS. the City Plaaaina Commission did hold a public heariag at the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim oa
September 28~ 196~1~ at 2:00 o'dock P.M., notlce of seid publlc 6earL-g haviag beep duly givea as requirod by
law and in accord~nce with We peovisions of the Aaahelm Mnnidpal Code, Chepter 18.64, to hear aad consider evideace
for aad against eaid propomed condifleaal nse aad to iaveetigate and make findings and recommendaUoae ia coanectioa
thetewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissioa, ~fter dne inepesctloa~ iavestlgatioa, and etudy mede by itnelf and in ite behalf,
wd after due consideration of all evidence aad repocts offered at said hearing, doee gad aad deteimiae the followiag fadx
1. Tha: the pcoposed use la propedy oae for which a Conditional Use Permit is anWorized by this Code, to wit:
establish a drive-thrL "Jack-in-the-Box" re~taurant with waiver of the required parking
gpa~es.
2e That the proposed use would be incompatible with the exisiing single family residential
adjacent to subject propertyo
3. That the proposed use and technique of ~iynin7 is in violation of the purpose and
intent of the sign policy of the Citye
4, That sub~ect property was reclassified to the i:-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone
with deed restrictions limiting its use to business and professional offices.
5e ihat at the time the sub~ect property was deed restricted to business and profe5sional
officesy the abutting pronerties to the •ast were classif ied to the R-1, Single Family
Resideritial, Zoae.and subsequently developed with single-family residences, the buyers of
which.ralie~ upon the deea restrictions on subject property to guazd agains~ the development
, of.•land uses incompatible with their.homes.
6e That the proposed.use would establiah heavy co~ercial use of the residential street
adjacent to sub~ect property in a manner de*.rimenial io the peace, heaith, safety, and ganeral
welfaxe of the Citizens of the City of M aheim~ ~
7. That no change had.taken place in the area to warrant removal of the C-1, deed
restrictions on the propertye
. 8, That 5 persons appeared representing 2C persons in the Council Chamber opposing
subject petitiono
Ci-D -1-
1
~
' t ~
~:
""" ~- -__ _... ..
'__
'~^-.~.--..~____. '
.....,..o'~
/ '.__.-~_~.. ~
, ~ _ "___
, 1
t/ _'_
..
;
~
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aaeheim City Plenaiag Commiasioa does hereby dmy subject
petitton for Coaditionel Use Peimit oa the baais of the aforemeattoned findings.
THE FOREGOIIVG RESOLUTION is si~ed and avotoved by me.this d y of October~ 1964.
,
SECRETARY ANAHEIIH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORPiIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIII~ )
I~ Anri •KTBbs ~; g~ery of the City Plannine Commiesion of the City of Anaheim, ~'o hereby certi[y that the fore-
Qcin6 resolntioa was passed and adopted et a meetiag of the City Plannlag Commie~ioa of the City of pnaheim, held on
'~eptember 28~ I964,~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the memben thereof:
AY~: COI~IISSIONERS: A11red, Chavos, Gauer, Yungall, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~neo
'ABSENT: COA~AlISSIONERS: Camp, Perry.
IIV WTfNESS WHEREOF, I hwe heeennto set my hend thir 8t1 ~~y of October~ 19f,4e
_. /~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEDH CITY PLANNII4G COMMISSION
~ , ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL 1NG COMb[ISSION
AT1'ES'P:
RESOLUTION N0. 1362
~D
_~