PC 1964-1965-1372!
,
, ,'
I
~~
RESOLUTION NO. 1372, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTfY PLANNII~G COIOQSSION OF THE CTfY OF ANAHEDi
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 631 BE (iRANTED
WEiEREAS, the City P1wNcg Co~mis~ion oE the City oE Aa~hdm did eeceive ~ wt!$ed p~tidon fo~ Condititmd
! Use P~mit fra~m CALVIN L. PEBI.EY, 609 Tudor Place, Anaheim, California, Ormer~ VIVIAN ELLIS,
; 820 South Sylvan, Anaheim, California, Agont. of certain real property situated in the City
j of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 7 of Tract Noe 3042
; .~a
WEIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hol¢ ~ pnblic heacina ~t th~ Gtq H~11 in the Gtq of M~i~p oq
October 19, 1964, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., aotlce of erid publle heidaQ ~~Wn~ be~n dnly ~iven u teqnited by
law and in accordance with the pcovlsions of the M~heim I~nmidpal ~ode, Fh~pter 18.6~, to 6e~r ~nd `conlitlbe evideaee
for ~nd agaiast said propoaed ooa¢itioaal nse ~nd to invesUgaRe wd oike•Eisldinp aod eecotl~maad~tioa~ Li cbnnectiod
theeewith~ and
WHEREAS, sdd Co~nmisaioq, aRer dne iaepection, InvesppUpn, ~nd ~tydq ~o~de by itYelf imd la iti b~h~lE, aid
aftar due ooasidecatIon of ~il evIdeace aad ee~wcta offeted at stld 6e~da~, doet'8nd and detpemine the followld~ fi~t~;
I. Tdat the proposed nse is properlq oae for w6ich a Caaditio~l.0ss Peemit is ~uthocls~ b~r t61, Cods, to
wit: permit the use of a existing buiiding on the propert~ for church services.
2. Th~t the pcoposed nse wlll not ~dvenely affeet tke ~djoinip~~l~d ase~ ~nd tLe ~rbwth ~ dNelo~ehf of
the ~ in which it is peopored to be located.
3. 1'6at the size ~qd sh~pe of the site peopo~ed for the ase i~ ~dequate to ~llow the tutl deoeldpiei~{ oE the
propossd tlse in a maaaer aot det:imental to the paeticnl~r area aoc to the peaee, he~ltb. sate4y; aad tedenl w61~~re
of fhe Citisens of tke City oE Aa~eim. "
'~ 4. That t6e graatln~ of'the CoediHoa~l Use Peemit mda the conditioas impo~ad, if ~aY~ r-lA dot b~ detiimqmt~l
to tbe peace, hedth, s~fety, aad genpral aelfere of t6e Cttiseas of the' Clty of' l~rt~heim. '
5o That the petitioner stipulated to use of the structure to two evenings a week as well
as during the daytime on Sunday, and that not more than three cars would be parked on the
premises during the dayt:mea
6~ That no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petitiono
Ci-G
-1-
t
;
!
a
i
i
i
~ -'
. :
s ~ , - -
1:
I , , • r~ J ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tl-at the Aaaheim Citq Pl~nning Commiesion doee heceby graat subject
Petitton for Conditionel Uee Pamit, npon the followin~ coaditions aWch aro heceby fouad to be a necessary prerequisite
~o the propor~l nae of the anbject propecty in order to preeerve the s~fery and genenl welfare of the Citisene of We ~
City oE Aaahelm: ' #
le I'hat a time limitetion of two years is granted for the use of subject property, upon
expiration the use will be reviewed by the Commission to determine its need; and upon the
request of the petitioner, if approved by th~ Commission, an additional one year may be granted.
. ~
~
~
~
. ~
~
~
. ~
4
_
• #
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ia siQned and ap~roved bq me tLia 29th day of October, 1964.
~
;
f ~ r ~E
~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CTfY P 1NG COI~IISSION t
A1"fEST: ~
Ci~~~~ l~x~~ •
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFO1iNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I ~ Ar~ Krebs.~. Secretery of the City Plenning Commissioa oE the ~Ity of "Anaheim, do heroby certify that the
foregoing reeolntioa was pnssed end edopted at e meetiag oE the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim,
held oa October 19~ 1964, et 2:00 o'clock P.bI., by the followiag vote of the memben thereof:
AYES: CO-~tISSiONERS: ~~P, ~avos, Gauer, l~ungall, . Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COb~QSSIONERS: N~
ABSENT: COl~NISSIONERS: Allred.
IN W1INESS WHEREOF, I heveheremto set my hmd this 29th day of October, 1964.
~ ~~d Z~~
' SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNIIQG CO1I~ILSSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1372
C2~G -2-