PC 1964-1965-1405i -
.
w
...,-F_~..-, ~. ..,. .....,,,-.. ~ _.. ,.:....~....... _......_~.. ... .
r ~ ~ ~' ~
RESOLUTION N0. 1405, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNII~iG COWL5SI0~1 OF THE CITY OF ~-NAHEDM
RECOWENDIIQG TO THE CITY COIMCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEDI THAT
PETI'fIOK FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 64-65-39 gE ~ppROVED
WHEREAg, che Ciqr Plw~ain` Commi~don of th~ City of Aa~hNm did ncNve ~ verifl~d Pet12lon tor Recl~s~i8ca
tioa hom FRED Bo AND BIANCE~ MORLEY, 501 North East Street, Anaheim, Califoinia, Owners of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot Noso 6, 7~ and 8 of Tract Noe 549
; ~nd
WEIEREAS, the Ciry Pl~naia~ Commissiaa dld lald ~ pobli~ h~tleL ~t the Gty Hdl ia tl-e City of M~helm on
November 9~ 1964' et 2:00 o'cloct P.N. ooNa of sdd pnblic hhela~ h~vla~ b~en duly avoa u required by
Ipw and in accordaaee aith the pmvisioa~ oE the M~hN~ Mmlol~l Cod~, Ch~ptar 1e.72, to hMr ~nd caaslder evidence
Eor and aQcinst s~id ptoposed n~c1w16cation ~nd to lawatipN ~ad ~~la 8adinp ~ed eeeonmaod~tloas in coauectioa
thetewith7 ~nd
WHEREAS. ~dd Commis~ioa, ~ftar dne lesp~tlas, lswrtipNaa. ~nd ~tud~r ~~d~ by its~lt ~md is lt~ Mhdf, aad
~Rer due conaidention of dt evideace md npotN o[i~nd ~t ~dd bearln`, dwi flod ond debemlae !ha followln` facta:
1. That the petitioaer p~posu ~ nclaut8c~tioa oE We ~bow daeriMd propedy fro ~ R-1, One Family
Residential, Zone to the:.G-ly Ne3ghborhood Commercial9 Zone ta establ~s~ a service station on
subject propertyo
2e That the proposed reciassification is considered in conjunction with General Plan
Amendment Noe 42~ ~
3. '~hqt tye p~p~sed eeclusiflcatlon of ~ubJ~ct propwty ls ae~s~ry ~nd/or de~inble for the oederly wd pro-
pa development of Ws oommnaity.
4^ Th~t the peoposed ~eclu~iBeWoa oE subJect p~ope~ty doss PeoP~rlY e~1~N to th~ soees ~md their peemltt~d
wes loally e~t~b11~6ed in clae peo~dmity to ~ubject p~opnty a~d to the sones ~nd thNr peemitted n~es ~en~nlly estab
lished throuahout the commuaity
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are propossu to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which
will be generated by the permitted uses, i.n accordance with the circulation element of the
General Plano
6. That the petitioner stipulated to construction of the service station in accordance
with Exhibit No. 3.
7. That seven persons appeared in ravor and one person appeared in opposition to subject
petition.
i
~ - _..
, ~ - a
,..
t~
~~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE~ HE 1T RBSOLVLD tlNt tht M~hNs Citp Pl~aale~ Oo~ois~lon doh ti~bY naommead
W the City Conndl of the Gty oi Aa~6elm th~t snbJ~ct P~tltloa Eoc R~ci~slBaRlon M~pP~~ ~d~ br w doin~,
tL~t Tltle 18-Zoaln` of th~ An~heim Mnnidp~l Cod~• b~ ~ma~d~d to aolud~ tM abov~ dNalb~d ptopKty from th~
R-1, One-Family Residential, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found
to ba a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of sub~ect property in order to preserve
the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the oLmers of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
32 feet fn width from the center line.of the street, a2ong Sycamore Street, for street widerdrg
purposes includ~ng a 15-foot radius corner return.
2. ~'hat the oompletion of tk~ese reclassification proceedings is contingent upon th~ grant-
ing of Conditional Use Permit Noe 632.
3o That the owners of aubject property shall pay to the City ~f Maheim the sum of 52.00
per front foot alonq East Street and Sycamore Strest for street lighting purposes.
4< That the owness of sub~ect property shall submit an irrevocable offer of a deed of
easemerrt for alley widening purposes, provided however, that no permanent underground storage
facilities shall be located in the proposed easement.
5. Thet Condition Nos. 1 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a
period of 18U days from date ~iereof9 or such further time as the City council may grant.
6e That 'sub~ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications.on fiie marked Exhibit Nos. 1 2 and 3„ and further provided that subject
,~roperty shall be developed in accordance wi~h ~he service station s3te deve~opment standards.
THE FOREtiOII~id RESOLUT'lON i~ si~ued ~nd ~ppeowd bp m~ thi~ 19t f November, 1964e
. CHAIIt11AN ANANEOi CITY G COWIIB~ON
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEA~ CITY PLANNING COMIQSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANdE ) ~~~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, tArA*nK~~ SeeretaY of th~ City Pi.aole~ Commis~loa ot th~ Gtp ot Ae~hNo, do benbY c~ttltp th~t t6~ foa~
~ola` eesolution wu pwed ~nd ~dopt~d ~t ~ m~etln` of th~ City Plrmaln~ Coeel~~ioo ot W~ Gtr of MqhNm~ hdd ~w
November 9, 1964 ~ ~t 2:00 o'cloclc P.ld., by tb~ tollowla~ rot~ ot t6~ m~ab~es tbw+ot:
AYES: COi~M13SI0NERS: ~ry Mtungall, Perry~ Rowland.
NOES: COAMSSIONE~t3: None.
AHSENT: COMIAQSSIONERS: Allred, Camp.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I h~vs 6erwato ~~t my h~nd lhi~ 19th day of November, 1964.
RESOLUTION NO. 1405 '
SECRETARY MIAHE01 CRY PLANlqNG CWBqSflOtl
R2-A '~