PC 1964-1965-1423' \
' RESOLUTION NO. 1423~ SER:ES 1964-65
{
_ -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COAIMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
_ RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEDN THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 64-65-17 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plannina Commisslon oE the City of Mobeim dld recefve a vedfied Petition tor Raclusitlca
doefrom VILLA EM'EFcPRISES, 1405 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, California, Owner~ CLIFF
ANDER50N,~1405 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, California, Agent of certain real property
sifu~'ted in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referr.ed to herein as though set forth in full
; and
,~
'1
~-s
i
a~
,~
i
~~
i~
~
i
~;-,~,~,~
t
;
~,
~
~F
14HEREAS, the City Planning Commiesion did hold a public headng at the City Hdl ia the Clty of Mahelm on
November 23~ 1964~ ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice oE sald public he~ariag h~vina been duly aiven as reqnired by
law ead in accordonce aith the provisioas of the Maheim Municipei Code, Chapter 18.72, to 6eor ~nd coaslder evidence
for and ag~ia~t sdd ptoposed recinsificaUoa and to investipte ~nd make dading~ ~nd recommend~tioa~ ia conaection
therewith; aad
WHEREAS, ~ald Commissloa. ~Rer due lnspection, investigatioa, ~nd study m~de by lt~elf ~nd ie its beh~lf, ~ad
after due wadderatioa of dl evidence ~nd repoets offered ~t ~dd he~dag, does ~nd aad determiae tAe folloalag hch:
1. That the petiUoner proposes ~ reclaulfication oE the ~bove deacribed property from the R-1, One Family
Residential, Zone to the R-3, l4ultiple Faiaily Residential, Zone to es~ablish a two story 10-
unit apartment building with carports.
2. Subject reclassification is considered in conjunction with General Plan Amendment
No. 32.
3• That the propo~ed cecl~ssific~tion of ~ubject propeety is nece~sary ~nd/or deiirable for the orderly u-d pro-
per developmeat of tbe community.
4• That the proposed reclusi$e~tioa oE enbfect peopeRy does peoperly rolate to the sones ~nd their permitted
usee 1oc~ily ~t~blished ia ciase proximity !o subject property ~nd to the zones end their permitted uses genadly est~b-
liehed throughout tho commuairy.
5. That the proposed reclassification of sub~ect property does not require dedication for
and atandard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which
will be generated hy the persitted Lses, in accorda.^.c~ ~~i±h the c?rc~latic^ ~:e:^ant of the
General Plan.
6. That nne person appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~'
_ i
Rl-A .1. ' , =~
i
. 1 t .;
1 +
. !'
t~
~~
_ !~ :'a
i ~~ ~JJ.:-+~ ~' . . ..
:~
_--~'~=~' _. _
~ .. , ,
E' _, ..r.: ; . . :.w
Ittaured:
ROY Ii. FOX9 ~ ~ , ~X~12~~ ~ r•~~~
VER2d0Y A. REII~'~R and. ~I~EN Je REII~~R, an8 .
R~ARIH~,R A. RrIHI~'~R and ESTI~R I.. REIF~SR. .
~: ~ S~CURITY TITLE INSIIRANCE COMPANY
>".; ' a Cali/ornia wrporation, 6erein called !lu Company, ,
Insures the parties named as insured in Schedule A,the heira, deviaees, peraonal repreaentatives oE such insured,
or, if a corporation, ita auccesson by dissolution, merger or rnnsolidation, againat loss or damage not exttedino the amount
'~-~ stated in Schedule A, together with costa, attorneya' fea and expensea which the Company may become obligated to pay
as provided in the Conditiona and Stipulationa hereof, which the inaurcd shall suatain by reason of the mattero numbered
%{ 1 to 4 in Part Three of Schedule B of thia policy.
.,
~~ CLTA 1963 SCNEDW E. A STANDARD GOVERAGE
~,_I
~
~~: 268973-A
_~
_.._ . --- .m'.'m _ _ t
~L~: s 14~.25 .
EQcctive date: April 23, l~il St $:00 A, M. Amount of '41Wi~y: 8~,3p~p~6~~Q
The eatate or intereat in the land deacribed or re[ernd to in Ihis sc doT overed by thia poli ' ` 02~222 A?sr,~'
•}a
'N
~ 8 PBe ~~ - 4~ JilL 1964 ~
, - ; RECEIVEA .
Tide to the eawte or interat wvered by thia olic at the d ereof ia veated in: ~~~ p~, ~
~ROY I~I. ROX, a rrarried ~~~`<<o~ 6 a ~9~~
~ ~ ~ ~ RECLASS. N0, ~~ ~is ~7
/,~ ~
1ue Iand reterred to
and is described.ae f
in the State of California, County of ~,a~e
The l~!e~te:ly one halP af the Easterly 150 Peet oP the tollowing describedl
IproperCy: ~
T'nat portton of Lo~ 27 oP Anaheini Fxtensl.c~~, in the City of Anaheim,
as sho~+m on a N:ap of Survey made by ~~Tilliam Hamel Sn 1868, and Siled
~~ ~r~ nf'f'Sr.~ ~f r,i,~ CQUnty gecorder o£ Loa Angeles Countv, CaliPornl.a.
~ described as follovts: ~
Be~inn:ir.g at a point in the center line of Vermont Avenue, distant there-
or: 1G°.09 Feet i~ortheasterly from its intersectiion with the center line
of P~_~ Street, and running thence Northeasterl;,~ along said center line
of Ve.:_:o:~t Avc:~ue, 300 feet; thence Southeasteriy parallel w,th the East-
erly Z=r.e oi' tre parczl oP land described in Certificate of Title No.
772j, ix. the office oP the Registrar of Iand Titlea of said Orange
Coun~f, z:~d the extensions of said line, 257 Peet; thence Southwesterly
~arallcl. cri~h the center line oP Vermont Avenue 300 feet; thence :~orth-
~aesterly parallel nrith the Easterly line oY the parcei oP laad described
in said certificate of T3tle No. ;725, and the exteneions oP said.line, ,
2~~ feet to the point of beginning; ~ ~ ,~
X EPTING THEREFROAI the Northwesterly portion included in Vermont Avenue. .. -~
~
_.. _ .~
, NOAI, THEREFOHE, BE.LT RESOLVID that the M aheim City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of the City of Maheim that subject Petition for Reclassification
~~be approved and, by so doing, that Titlel8-Zoning of the Anaheim Mun.icipal Code be amended to
exclude the above described property from the R-1, One-Family Residential, ?one and to incorpor-
ate said described property into the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the ~ity of
Anaheim.
1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ per
front foot along Vermont Street for tree planting purposes.
2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00
ppr front foot along Yermont Street for street lighting purposes,
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of
190 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
4. That the sidewalks shall be installed along Vermont Street, as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the
City Engineer.
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in ac.cardance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Workso
6. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Maheim the sum of $25.00
per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the
time the bu;lding permit is issued.
7. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the west, south and east
property lines.
8. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be finished with exterior
building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum capacity of 100 cubic feet shall
be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided
to protect the interior walls of the carports.
9. That subject property be developed substantaially in accordance with Exhibit Noa 19
provided however, that all construction be limited to one story in height, that parking be pro-
vided in accordance with Code requirements and, further, provided that the development plans
shall be sub~ect to Development Review prior to issuance of a building permit.
10, That Candition Nose 4, 5, 7 and S, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
final building inspection.
THE FORE~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this da of December, 1964.
ATl'EST:
S~~~Z'~.~
SECREJ'ARY ANAH M C?Ty cLeNnrTn,r, muurggTqN
STATE OF CALIPORNIA )
ODUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
. ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COMMISSION
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of °.he City Planning Commission of the City of Anahe'_~n, do hereby
certify that the foregoing reso'ution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning
Commission of the City of Anahein,. held on November 23, 1964, at 2:00 0'clock P.Ih., by the
following vote of the members thereof~
AYES: OOMMISSIONFASi Allred, Camp, Gauer, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COtAMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs OOWIMISSIONERSs None.
IN WITNESS WHFR~F~ : have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 1964.
~~~
SECREfARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING W1+WiSSiON