PC 1964-1965-1441, ~ " 3
~ ~
RESOLUTION N0~
144I, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COIalISSION OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEDYI
RECOIiO(ENDIIiG TO THE CTfY COUNCIL OF THE CTfY OF ANAHE~ THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 64-65-63 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, th~ Ciqr Pl~miaj Co~mluloa of th~ Ciry of M~hNm did eec~dw ~ wdfisd PaUtloa for Racluai6s~-
tioufrom FLOREI~E Eo TAYLOR, 501 Arroyo Square, South Pasadena, California, Urmer~ CHARLES
P, TAYLOR, 942 £merald Bay~ Laguna Beach, California, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California, described as the Easterly 250
feet (tha Westerly line of Nhich is parallel rlth the Westerly line of Citron Street) of that
portion of Lot 39, "Anahel.m Extension", as shown on a Map made by Wm. Hamel and filed for
recard in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles Couniy, California~ described as
folloMa~ Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 39~ thence Southerly along the
Eatterly line thereof 175e7 feet~ thence Westerly, parallel to the Southerly line of said
Lot, 118403 feet to the Wssterly line thereof~ thence Northerly along said Westerly line
500e42 feet to the North line of said I.ot~ thence East aiong said North line 1225e8 feet to
the point of beginning~ Excepting therefrom the Southprly 48000 feet of the Easterly 149075
sCC:
; ~nd
~
~:
~
~
~ ~
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nnia` Commltsioa dld hold ~ public 1Nein~ ~t the City 8d1 !a the Clty of Aa~heim on
December 7~ 1964, ~t 2:00 o'clodc P.6l. aoticv ot ~dd publle hado~ 6~vla~ bNa dnly ~iwe n nqalr~d by
1aa ~nd in ~cooed~nce wlth the provliloa~ of th~ An~h~lm Almifcip~l Cod~, Ch~pta IB.M, to 6~ar a-d con~ider wldwc~
tor ~ad qu~ut sdd ptopa~d ncly~l$c~tioa ~ad to invMUpte ~nd m~ks dadiap ~nd reeomoead~tlon~ in cona~cHoa
W~nwlthc ~hd
WHEREAS, ~Ud Commlr~laa, dbr du~ lwp~cNoa, invutipUon, ~nd ~endy m~d~ by lt~~li ~nd le !t~ Mh~lf, ~nd
~it~r dti~ ooa~id~rWoa ot ~11 wld~noe ~nd t~porb ott~d ~t ~dd 6~ulaR, does Eind u~d d~t~emine th~ ~oUawle~ hch:
1. Th~t th~ p~titiooa propo~M ~ nalaoigc~tloe oE !6~ ~bow d~scrlMd peopeRy from th~ R-0, One Family
S~.iburban, Zor.e ~o the G-1~ ~eiphbczhtlpd Cetnner:,i~iy Zone +~ astab::sh a coin-opvzst~d cai
wash and possit:e future development of a drive-in or drive-up ref`rest~rr.E~t :tand~
2. That the Fioposed •reciassifi_ation is in confozmance with the ~eneza: Plan.
3• T6~t th~ pcopw~d nclwi8cadon oi ~abJ~ct propaty 1~ e~~~ry ~nd/or dMinbl~ for Che oed~rly and pro-
pec dwelopm~nt o! th~ oomnimlty.
4• Th~t th~ peopo~~d ncl~utlBcWoa o! ~rbj~ct pcop~ety doM properly nl~te to ths sane~ ~ad eLeie permltted
nrN locally »i~bl!~E~d !n cloM peoslmlq ta ~ubHct prop~ety ~nd to th~ soan ~nd thNr p~rmitt~d wN ~~oenlly eu~b-
lloh~d theon~hoat t6~ oooasunlty.
5. ?bat the proposed reclasaification of subject property doe~ not require dedication
ior or siandard improvement of ai~utting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways whict~ are improved to carry the ±y;~e and q~~antity of traffic
which will be yenerated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the'General Plan.
6s That the traffic engineer shall determine the feasibility of permitting the propoaed
number of curb r,uts into LaPalma Avenue, since the petitioner proposed to develop sub~ect
proper;y easterly for a drive-in restaurant9 necessitating additional curb cut~.
7. 7hat three pareor,s appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition.
Rl•A
•1-
.... .. ~..t~i...._
1 . "'.4. .
.;~j..' ~f . .
NOW, 17iEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED th~t tb~ Aa~haim Gt~ P'l~anle[ O~oamis~ia- a°°~ b~nti7 n°°mm~nd
bo- !he City Oomcll of tb~ Citr ot Aa~haim th~t snbJ~ct Petldon fot itkl~sdSatlaa b~ ~ppeov~d ad~ h so doin~,
•~1it Tltle 1&Zoain~ of t6~ AnaliNm Bnaidpal Cod~ M~meeded to nelad~ t1~ ~bow desaib~d peoP~etY from the
<,;~', One-Family Suburban, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial, 2one, upon the folloMing conditions which are hereby found to be
a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of sub~ect property :~~ order to preserve the
safety and general Nelfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheima
7, That the sidewalks shail be installed along ~itron Street and LaPaloia Avenue, as
-?quired by the City ~dneer and in accordance wi!h standard pians and speci£icetions on file
in the office of the City Engineer.
2, That the cu:bs shali be repaired aiong Citron Street, as required by the City Engineer
an~i in accordanc:e with standerd pians and specificatjons on fiie in the office of th1 City
Engineer.
3e That the owner of subject property sha11 deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
thirty-twro feet in width, from the cen;er line o: tRe street9 along ~it:on Street, for street
widening purposes.
4a That tt~e owner of subject property sha~i pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 32.00
per front foot aiong Citron Street and LaPalma Avenue9 fo: stree~ iighting purposesa
5. That the o~vner or' subject property shaii pay to th! City of Anaheim the sum of 15«
per front foot along Cit.ron ~ireei and LaPa;,;~: .°.•:er.::°Y .*~o?' {ree plantina purposeso
6. That Condition Nosa 1, 29 39 49 and 5 above mentioned, shall be complied w:th within
a period of 180 ~ays from the date hereof9 or s~.h further time as the City Council may granto
THE FOREGOIN(3 RESOLUTION i~ ~l~e~d aid ~pprowd by me thb 17th of Decembar, 1964.
CtIAIItMAN ANAHEIM Ci1'Y G COWII~ION
ATTEST:
~
SECRETARY ANANEnI ~1TY pLAN~dING COMMISSION
°'*~TF 4F CAGTF~IWIA )
COUNTY CF ORANdE ) ~~~
CITY OF ANAHF.D~1 )
I, Anh BtxiQti', S~~Y of t6~ Gty Plw-!a~ Commi~don oE t6~ Clty ot M~h~im, do h~ c~etlty tlut th~ toea
~ola~ ca~olutlon wu pwed ~~~odc P Mm~ ~ follo ~ vote o~ ~ m~b~n ~ ~! Clq ot M~Y~L, hdd m
December 7, 1964,
~yg,s; COI~tWIONERS: Allre~, Camp, GauerY Idungail, Perryy Rowland~
NOES: COYilT4SI0NERS: None.
AHSENT: COIO~SS[ONBRS: ~one.
IIr qriTl~iESS 11HEREOF, I luv~ heewnto ~~t my h~nd ehis 17th day of December, 1964.
~
sEC~r~r Mriwan~ crr~r ~.~xa~a c~oaaao~x
t RESOLUTION N0. 1441 '
;? .y
:~ R2-A
r~
~