PC 1964-1965-1555- \ ,~ ~_~
RESOLlITION N0. 1555a Series 1964-65
A RE50LLTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ODMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REQ~NA7ENGING TO THE `:ITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHQM THAT
GENFAAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 52 BE DISAPPROVID
` 1~fHERFAS, trP City Council of the City ~f Anaheim did adont a General Plan by
Resolution No. 63R-869, showi~g the generai description and extent of Iand uses~
within the Cit.y and indicating the present belief of the City Council as to possible
future development and redevelapment of land within the City; and
WHERFAS, the City Planninc Commission of the City of M aheim did receive a
verified petition ior Reclass=f;scation No. 64-65-97, which pe±ition has implicat-
ions on poiicies as er.p~es5e~' ~~m said General Plang and
WHEREAS., in conjLnction wi~ih the notice of the hearing on said reclassification,
nutice was a;so given regardin~ the considexation of an a~,:endment to the General
Plan in the generai iocation aid vicinity of subject property of said reclassification;
and
WHEREAS, the Citiy P?anninc Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall :n the City of Anaheim on March 19 1965~ at 2s00 0'clock P.Mo9 notice of said
public hearing.}~aving been d~iy given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of the Anahe.im Municipai Code, to hear and cansider evidence for
and against said Amendment to the Gene= aI Plan and said proposed Petition for
Reclassification and ±o investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith~ and
WHEREAS, said Commi^sion after due inspection, investigation and study made
ioy itsel= and in its bei~~iE and aFter due conside•ration of all evidence and reposts
offered at said hearing, DOES HEREBY FIND
le That the present general description and extent of land u~es
in the aforementioned area adequately represents past and
current City Po;icies reqarding possible future development
of said general area desc_ibed asa a ciscle at the soutn-
we~t corner of Sycamore an~j East Streets, with a radius of
approximately 300 feet.
2o That no evidence wss preseni;ed at sa}d hearing which would
justify the Cii:y Planning Commission recommending a cfiange
in the above-mentior,ed policies to the City Council.
3. That Exhbiit "A" of General Plan Amendment No. 52 does not
constitute an acceptable alternative to current policies
as illustrated on the General Plan.
~ `} t ?
NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the City Planning Commission of the City
of Maheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that
f~indings andrreferredAto~thenPlanningaDepartment for annual reviewaofrsaidtPlana
T}~ FOR~iOING RE90LlJIION is signed and approved by me this llth day of March,
1965.
' i
~;};pI~AN ANAHIIM CITY ING OOMMISSION
ATTaT:
~~~~~~
SECREIAAY ANAHQM CIIY PI.ANNING CAMNIISSION
STATE OF CALIF~RNIA )
WUNfY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHQM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning ComQnission of the City of Anaheim
du hEreby certify that the foregoing =esolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the City Planning Comnissio~ of the Ci±y of Anaheim, held on March l, 1965, at
2s00 0°c:ock P.M.9 by the '.'o??.ovring vote of the members thereofi
AYESi G~DNVdISSI~NERS~ Ali~ed, ~amr, Gawer. Herbst, ~qall~ Perry, Rowland.
NAESa OOMMISSIONERSs None. ~
AggEKf: OONWISSIONERS~ None.
IN WITNESS WHi:•R~F9 I have hereunto set my hand this llth day of March, 1965.
SECREf~ hi C~ING ~MMIISSIION
Res. No. 1555