PC 1964-1965-1558~
~~-~ '•,..~
RESOLUTION N0. 1558, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTfY PLANNING COIQQSSION OF THE CTA'Y OF .ANAHEIN
THAT PETITION FOR CONDI'TIONAL USE PERIIIT 680 gE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Pl~maloa Commiuion of the Citq of An~halm did eeeeive ~ veri8ed Petitlon for Conditlna~l
Use Permltfrom PHILLIP H. CASE, 2501 West R~11 Road~ Suite "A", Maheim, California, Owne.r
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Or.ange, State o:
California, described as Lots Nos. 4 and 5 of Tract No. 787
~ Na
WHEREAS, the City Pl~enla` Commission did lald a public 6e~rin` ~t the City Hdl In the City of M~6eim oa
March 15, 1965, ~t 2:00 o'clodc P.M.. aoUce of s~id pablic heeela~ b~vin~ beea ddy ~ivaa u reqnired by
law and ia accoed~ace with the peovi~lau of the M~heim 6lnaidpal code, Ch~ptee 18.64, to he~r ~nd coaaider evideace
Eor wd aQaieut sdd proposed conditional nse ~nd to iave~tipte ~nd mdce findln~s ~md eeoommead~Uon~ !a connectloa
therewiW; aad
WHEREAS, sdd Commissioe, dter due inspsetiaa, lavestiptioa, ~nd stndy m~de by ibelt ~ed in it~ beh~lf, wd
aRer due coa~iderWoo of ~11 evidenee aad r~ports o~end ~t sdd he~dn`, doe~ $ad ~nd determina the followin` hets:
1. That the pcoposed use is properly one ior wblch a Coaditiood ,Use Peemit is ~uthod:ed by t6i~ Code, W
wit: establish a one and two story multiple family planned residential development.
2. Th~t the proposed we wlll aot advatsely ~Efect the ~djoinla` l~nd n~e~ ~md tL~ ~towth ~md dw~lopmeat oE
t6e are~ in which it is proposed to be located.
3. T6~t the tise ntd ~hape of the ~ite pcoposed foe the we ts ~dsqua!e to allow tLe fnll developm~nt of t6~
peoposed nse in a m~nner aot detdmeatel to the p~etical~r are~ na to the pe~ct, he~lth, s~fety. ~nd ~enecil wtl~~
of t6e Cltiseus of the City of Aa~hhaim.
4. That t6e ~noting of the Conditioatl Use Peemit mda the condittons impo~ed, if wy, will aot bs detdmentd
to the pe~ce, hedth, ~~[ety, ~nd ganenl wel[ae of Ws Cltisea~ oE the Cltq of Aa~hhelm.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to sLbject petition.
Cl-G -1-
,
.
~ ~~ t',,
,
IdOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED th~t the M~hsim City Pl~aaing Commission doea heroby gnnt aub)ect
Petitloa for Conditlon~l U~a Permit, upoe the followiaa condltlons ahich aee hereby found to be ~ neceswry precequisite
to the pcoposed nse oE the snbJect propedy in order to presecve the s~fety and genenl welhre of the Citiae~a oE the
City oE An~helm:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted sub~ect to the completion of Reclassi-
ficatSon No. 63-64-62.
2. That sub,~ect property shall be developed substa~tially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Maheim, mark~d Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
THE r'O.~E(i01NG RESOLUTION la sigaed aad ~pproved by me thls 25th of March, 1965.
. }
. ~ ~ i
CHAIRMAN ANAHE[M CiTY PLANNmG COMMISSION
ATTEST: V ~
;
~
r
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF OR~W(iE ) w.
C1TY OF ANkHEIN )
I, Mn Kreb~, Secret~ry of the Gty Planelue Commi~aion of the City oE Anaheim, do haeby cedt[y th~t the
fore~ola~ rowluUoa au pused ~nd ~dopted ~t • maetin` of the Clty Pl~rtnln~ Canmission of the City of Anaheim,
held on March 15~ 1965~ ~t 2:00 o'clock P.bl., by the following vote of the membecs thereof:
AYES: COb~lISSIONERS:• g1u'ed, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COAQUSSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COAtMISSIONERS: None.
IN WI'TNESS WHEREOF, I h~vehereunto set my h~nd this 25th day of March, 1965.
RESOLUTION NO. 1558
C2-G
i~~~~~_
SECRETARY ANAHEDVI CITY PLANNII'IG CONMISSION
:y.
__._~.~'~ `~