PC 1964-1965-1576.. . _ _ _. __ _
~ Y ` i. ~ ~
. RESOLUTION N0. 1576, SERIES 1964-65
p RESOLII'fION OF THE C1TY PLANNING CO1E~(ISSION OF THE CTfY OF ANAHED[
REC010lENDIIdG TO THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CCfY OF ANAHEDI THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 64-65-103 gE APpROVED
WHgRgAS the pty PlanninQ Commission of t6e Citq of Aaaheim did initiate a verified Petition for
Reclassificat~on on certain reai property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of C'alifornia, described as the North half of Lot 2, as shown on a Record of Survey of
part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B. 8 M., filed in Sook 1, page 55 of
Record of SuTVeys in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange Countys Excepting there-
from the Easterly 551.30 feet{ Also excepting therefrom the South 27.00 feet; Also excepting
therefrom the Westerly 53.00 feet, measured at right angles from the centerline of Buclid
Street
Property owned bys Fritz Goosens, 2401 North Park Boulevaril, Santa Ana, California, 92700
; ~d :
WHEREAS, the City Plaanina Commission did hold o pqblic hearL-g at the Gty H~ll ia We City of Aaohelm on .
March 29~ 1965, at 2:00 o'dock P.M[., notica of said pnbllc headng 6wln` beea dnly ~(ven u eeqniced
by laa and in accordaace with t6e provisions ot the Aa~heim Mnaidpal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hau ~nd consida evi-
dmce for and a~alast sdd propo~ed teclassiQcatlon aad to invesUeate and m~ke Sadings aed tecommend~tloosia
ooanectloa therewith: end
),
WHEREAS, said Commission, aRer dne inspectioa, investigatioa, end stndy made by ibelf ~ed in its be6dE, ;
end aRer dne rxneideratiou of all evideace aad repods o~ered at eaid heaiing, does Eind and deteemlae !6e ~ollowin` i
facts: ";
1.Th~tthe City Planning Commission proposes a reclassification of the above described s
property from the R-A, Agricultural, 7~ne, to establish an existing restaurant and cocktail ~
lounge as a conforming use in the C-2, Zone. :?
2. That an amendment to the General Plan is deemed un~ecessary, because the size of the #
parcel proposed for reclassification would not generally %.ffect the City's policies in this A
area.
3. That the existing use was established undex tr.e jurisdiction of the County. ~
4e l'hat no one appeared in opposition to subjec;; petition. ;
Rl-A -1-
~
~ .
~
d
~
~
~
~
c
~
q
s
f
NOES: COl~fISSIONERS: Nonee
ABSENT: CO![MISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WIINESS WfiEREOF, I have hereunto ~et my haad this 8th day of April~ 19650
~~~%~~ ~:.~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIlI CITY PLANNIl~IG CO10(LSSION
, .
- -~ s
'~
NOW, TEiEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED t6~t t6e Aa~heim Cltq P'lanning Commisaion does hereby recommend
W the Citq (bmcil of the City of Aaaheim that snbJect Petitloa for Reclassi8cation be appeoved and, by so doing,
t6~t Title 18-Zoaing of the Aaeheim Nlunidpel Code be emended to exclnde the ~bove described oropeety from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate said r~?scribed property into the C-2, General
Commercial, Zone, unconditionally<
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 8t of April~ 19650
CHAIItMAN ANAHEIbI C LANNIIVG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~.~c~v~c/ %~~z.~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIN CTfY PLANNING CO6[NRSSION
STATE OF CALI6"ORNU )
COUNTY CF 6R~NGE ) ss.
CTfY OF ANAHEDM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Pl~ming Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy thot the foie-
Qoing resolutloa aas passed md adopted at a meeting of the City Plaaaing Commission of the City oE Aaaheim, heid on
March 29 ~ 1965 ~ ot 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COd!lIiSSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Perry, Mungall, Rowlande
RESOLUTION NO. 1576
R2-A
_~
~
1
,
1
~