PC 1964-1965-1598(~
RESOLUTION N0,
i~
1598~ SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF '1!!E CITY PLANNIIdG COIOQSSION OF THE CTd'Y OF ANAHEIIN
1HAT PET1T[ON FOR VARUNCE N0. 1699 BE GRANTED
NHEREAS, the Ci4~ PI~eNa~ Commiuloa of ths Gty of M~hsim did rsceive ~ ved6ed Petition for Vad~ace
frwn ALFRED M. DESTRO~ 1224 North Ventura, Anaheim, California, Owner~ ANDREIN G. DUDICS,
1018 East Chestnut 5treet, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 58 of
Tract No. 2659
; ond
WNEREAS, the ~ity Pl~mala~ Commluion dld hola ~ pnbHc headn` st the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim
~ April 26~ 1965, ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M., aoUce of sdd public he~rina having been dnly given es required
by l~w ~ad ia ~coord~ace wteh the provi~lons oE the An~heim 1Nuaicipd Code, Ch~pter 18.68,to hear ~ad con~ider
evid~nc~ tor ~ad apiast sdd proposed v~rt~ace aad to investi~a~e ~nd mal~e Mdinp ~nd recommendatioas ia coaaec-
tion th~rewlt6; ~ad ~
~f1EREAS, uld Commi~slon, ~ft~r dne la~pection, investlptloa, ~nd stndy m~de by itselE and in tts behelf,
~ad ~ftee dne cauide~tloo oE ~11 eHd~nee ~nd repods offend u~dd 6e~rin~, does 8nd aed detecmiae the followiag
f~ch:
1. Th~t t6e petitloner roqne~t~ ~ v~d~ace trom the M~h~im Mnaicipd Code: Section 18e24a030 (3-a)(b)
which requires 0'minimum rear yard of 25 feet unless an equal area is provided elsewhere
on the lot to permit the development of an addition to an existing single family dwellinq.
2. T6~t then ~te e:apttoad or ertnordln~ry drenm~t~ace~ or coaditioos appllcable to tho propetty levolved
or to ths latended~wa of th~ property t6~t do aot ~pply ~eaenlly to tLe propeity or cl~as of use ia the samo vicinity
aod sone. ~
3. 7'bat the seqaested v~rlaice i~ aeeess~ry foe the pcesernWoa and eajoyment oE a substantial pcoperty right
pase~sed by ot6a propetty in the s~me viciuity ~nd sone, and denied to the propeRy ln quation.
4. T6at t6e reqne~ted vaci~nce will not be m~teti~lly dettlmeetal to the pablic welfate or lajndoaa to the peop-
edy or improvem~ab ie ~uch .vicioity ~nd sone le wWch the propecty is loc~ted.
- 5. That na one appeared in opposition to subject petitione
Vl-G
-1-
' ~,
~
.. ~ 1
.
a
i 1
, ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Maheim Clty Planning Commisalon does hereby ~rant anbject
petition foc Vedaace, npon the following conditloas ahich ace herebY fonad to be a necessary pcerequiiite to the pro-
poaed use of We subject proped9 ia order to peeserve the sefety and senenl welhee of the CiUseas of the City of
paahdm.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 6th day of May~ 19650
. ~
CHAIRb[AN ANAHEIM C1TY ANNING COMMISSION
A'fTEST:
~ / YJ/ ~.~a~
SECRETARY ANAHEDN CITY PLANNING CObIMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNiA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CffY OF ANAHEIIYI )
I~/~pn.-l~Bbs~~ gecretary of the City Plenniag Commisaioa of the City of Aaeheim, do hereby ceRify that ffie foce-
goiag resolution was paesed eud adopted at a meeting of the City Pleaning Commiesion oE the City of Aaaheim, held oa
April 26~ 1965~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eo1lowing vote of the members thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Al1Ted9 Camp, Herbst, ldungall, Perry9 RoNlando
NOES: CObONLSSIONERS: Nonee
AHSENT: COMhIISSIONERS: Gauer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my haad this 6th day of May~ 1965e
RESOLUTION N0. 1598
V2-G
~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIeA CITY PLANNING COi[6IISSION
.2.