PC 1964-1965-1626;
i' ~)
RESOLUTION N0. 1626, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIQG C010RSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEDi
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'SF~ 65I'f7~ 9 F ANAHEDI TfiAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. O4 il BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plamin` Commis~ion of the City of An~hsim did cecelve a w~ifled PatiBoa Eor Reclusifica
tloa hom JoFIIQ F. AND MARY R. KIRSCH, 103 Beckley Circle, Palm Springs,'California, Ownerss
bCDJ1NIEL ENGINEERING COMPANY, P. 0. Box 3668, Anaheim, California, Agent, af certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Californta, described
as the•-East half' of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section ~'~, Township
4 Soutfi, Range~l0 West, lying within the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a
map thereof, recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps, records of'said Orange County{
EXCEPTING T}~REFROM the West 330 feet of the North 6F0 feet thereof~ ALSO EXCEPTING TI~REFROM
the East 255 feet of the North 160 feet of the West 565 feet thereof
; ~nd
WHEREAS, the Cicy Pla-nini Commi~doa did hold a public hs~eiu` ~t the Gty Hdl in tl~e City of Aaahdm on
May 10~ 1965, at 2:00 o'clock P.N. aotice of ~dd public heuia` h~vln` beea duly Qlvsn ~s cequlred by
l~w aad in accordanee with the Ptovl~i~~ of the M~helm Munlciptl Code, C6~pt~e 1&72, to hear ~ad consider eHdance
for ~nd aQdast add ptopos~d rec1w19cWoa ~nd to invatlpte ~nd m~lce 8adfaa~ ~ad eeoommand~dons in coanectloa
therewith; ~nd
WHEREAS, sud Commlesloa, +~ftu dae 3nspeclios, iaveetl~ation, and sindy m~de bq ltielf ~nd in ita behdf, ~nd
aRer due coasideratioa of ~11 evideace ~nd cepocts ofEaed ~t ~dd he~cln`, does 6nd ~nd d~~mlae t6e followiae hets:
1. That the petiUoner proposes ~ recl~s~i6c~tioa of the ~bove described pcoparty Eeom th~ R-A, Agricultura2,
Zone ±o the R-i, ane Family Residential, Zone to develop a single family subdivision~
2o That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plan.
~. T6~t the proposed ieclusigc~tioa oE snb~ect propecty i~ aecess~ry ~md/or desinble for t6e ordedy and pro-
per development of tbe commuaity.
4'a That the proposed eecl~s~l8c~tion of snbJect pmpeety does peopaly relab to the soaes aad t6eir peemitted
uses loc~lly est~blished in clo~e pro:imity to subieet Property ~ad to the soaes ~nd their peemitted usas ~enatlly est~b-
lished thtoaQhout t6e commWdtY•
5~ That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the
General Plan.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A "1'
;
1
i
~ ~
.~
~
~
- --'_~j
` ~
1 -.'1
. /
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mcheim City P'l~nniai Commisalun does ber~by recommead
to the City Coondl oE t6e C[ty of M~heim that subject Petitioa for Recl~sai8c~tion be aPPtoved ~nd, bq so doiag,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aaaheim IAuaidp~l Code be ameeded te exclude the above described pcopecty from the
1. That a Final 7ract 41ap of subject property be approved by the City Council and
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in ac.cordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Maheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sigaed ~nd approved by me tLis 20th day of May~ 1965.
~ 1 , :
Cf{AIRIdAN AN~t1E1M CITY P G COMA[iSSION -
;
ATTEST: •~
's
r /~~~'e~C~GV~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMSSION ~
~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) i
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss. '
'c
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Seeretary of the City Plw-iaa Commissioa of t6e City of Anahdm, do heraby cectify tn;,~ the foee-
goiag resolution wu pwsd and ~dopted at ~ m~etini oE the City P'~nniaa Commission of the CitY of Maheim, 6eld o0
61ay 10~ 1965~ at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by the Eollowing ~•o.e of the members thereof: ~
~
AYES: COb[MISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Idungall, Perry, Rowland. ~'
a
NOES: C01~IISSIONERS: None. ~
i
T
ABSENT: COMYISSIONERS: None. ~
IIQ WITNESS WHEREOF, I h•ve herenato set my h~ed this 20th day of May, 1965.
~
~i~~ / ~
SECRETARY ANAHE~1 C1TY PLANNII'iG COiMSSION ~
RESOLUTION NO. 1626 ' ~
R2-A -Z' ~
~
~
- ~-T,.,;..._. --
>'~:;.x~~:_..asrir~ac:u,.~,~:.. . . ,.