PC 1964-1965-1637~
~.
1
d
i!
RESOLUTION N0. 1637, SERIES 1964-65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiCY PLANNII~G COMMISSION OF THE CI'fY OF ANAHFIM
THAT PETTfION FOR CONDTfIONAL USE PERMTf NO. b4Z BE ~~AMED
W}~R~AS the City Planning Comnission of the City of Anaheim did initiate a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, described as beginning at the intersection of a line
parallel with and distant Southerly 50.00 feet, as measured at rlght angles, from the cPnter
line of La Palma Avenue, with a line parallel with and distant Westerly 34.75 feet, as measured
at right angles, from the center line of Harbor Boulevard, formerly Palm Street, adjoining
said land on the EastR thence Southerly along said last mentioned parallsl line, 140 feets
thence Westerly at right angles to said Harbor Boulevard center line, 140 feet; thence North-
erly at right angles to a point on said first mentioned parallel lineR thence Easterly,
parallel with said La Palma Ave~ue center line, 145 feet to the point of beginning
Property owned by: Lana Corporation, 200 North Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California,
; end
WHEFEAS, the Ciry Planniag Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
May 10~ 1965~ et 2:00 o'ciock P.M., aotice of s~id public headng hav.ing been duly givea ae required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the ~lnahetm Munidpd Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear end considec evidence
for end aQainst said proposed coaditlonal use ond to investigate aad make fiadings end recommendations tn connection
thecewith; ~nd
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftec due inspection, tavestig~tioa, and study made by itself end in its behaif,
and aRer due considention oE dl evideece and repotts offered at sdd he~dna, does find and deteimine the following facta:
1. Thet t6e proposed use is properly one for ~vhich a Conditlonol We Pecmit ia authodsed by thie Code, to wit:
estdLiisii an eA:~Ling se~vice ~~~;.:cn a~ ~ cen.°e~ming uGP in thP C•l, General Commercial,
Zone within 75 feet of R-3 and A-2, )dultiple Family residencese
2e That the granting ef the Gonditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if
any9 wiil not be detrimental to the peace, hea:th, safety, and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Maheim.
3e That the existing use was established under Variance No. 551.
4e That no one appeared in opposition to subje:,t petition,
Cl-G "1"
~
NOW, THBREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City PlaaninQ Commission does heroby grant subject
Petition Eor Conditional Uae Permit, unconditionally~
THE FOREGOING RESOLU?ION is aiened end approved by me this 20th day of May~ 19650
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIAI CITY PLA ING CO(YQYIISSION
ATTEST:
/_i~~~~ %~7 [.~ilJ4/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) •
CO[1NTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTfY OF ANAHEIIN )
I, Ann Krcbs, Seccetary oE the City Planeing Commission of the City of Anaheiai~ do hereby ceRi[y th~t the
foregoieg cesolution aes passed artd adopted at a meetiag of t}-e City Pl~naing Cammission of the City of Ma6eim,
held on May 10~ 19659 at 2:00 o'ciock P.M., by the folloaiaa vote of the membeca thereoE:
AYES: COM~Y[ISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry9 Rowlande
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMiSSIONERS: Nnneo
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I h~vehereunto set my haad this 20th day of May, 1965e •
3
~-~~,-?v~-c/
SECRETARY 1NAHEIM CITY PLANNMG COMMlSSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1637 ' ~
C2-G "Z' . ~