PC 1965-1966-1759RESOLUT(ON NG., 1759, ShI~IES 1965•~6~~
A RESOLUTi4N OC THE CITY PLANNMG COMMISSIUN OF THC C1TY OF ANAI
R~COMM~NDING T~ TH~ CITY COUNCII, Or yE CITY Of ANAHEIM THA~
1'ETITION FOR RFCLASSIFICATION N0, ~5'~6G"'~`-? , gG pppROVED
; ~:
Ij
l ~ ~
' •~ i
~
i
_...;
' i .
~
i
~ ~•.
, i
~ ~
~ ~
~. . .,i
~' • 1
~
WHLRCAS, the City Planni~g Commission of the City of Anel~elm dld receive c~ verifiod Petltion for Recloaaitlcr,-
ARCHtT~C~S~~AY Sf'ORN, ~3011 West Commonwealth, C3uen:~ f'~rk, C,31ifc~rnia, (hvnEr~ ROSE 8 FEARS,
, ~00 North Euclid Street, ouite G86, Anaheirn, California, Agenl, of cert~in real
p;~operty sit.u,~t,~d in the City of An,iheim, County of Or~nge, State of Callfornia, described
~s l..ot ~10, /1 of Tr~.c,t. No, 1?91
; and
WMF,REAS, the City Planning Comrr~ission did hold e publlc hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anehelm on
August 30, 1965, At 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public heari~g heving been duly given aa required by
law and in eccordance with the provisloes of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18,72, to hear end conalder evidence
tor and ngeinst seid proposed reclessitication end to investigate end meke flndinga end recommendetions in connection
therewith; nnd
WH~REAS, said Commisaion, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in ite behalf, end
~Eter due consideration of all evidence and repcctR oEfered et said hearing, does find and cletermine the following facta:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the abuve describEd property from the R• i, One•-Farni ly
Residenti:~i, Zone to the C C), Com,nerci~~l Office, Zone tc est:~t~iish ~3n ~77~Chlt.@Ct's office in -an
existing residentiai stiuctuie
2 l't~at +he proposed ieci~ssific3tion, if apptoved~ constitutes such a minoz dNViation
that. r~o immedi~te'amendment to r,he ~eneral P13n is nec.ess:~ry; however, its relationship t.o
the existiny General N:an symhoi will be considered in the next annual review
~3 That the p:oposed reclessification of subject property is necessery and/or desirable tor the orderly and pra
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification ok' subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zonea end their permitted usea generally esteb-
lished throughout the community,
5. 'I'hat the proposed reclassific_~tion of subject propelty does not require dedicatior,
for and stand-~rd improveirent of ~butting stieets because s-~id pI•operty does relate to and
abut upon streets and hiyhw:~ys which are i!nproved to carry l,he type and quantity of traffi.c,
which wiil be genetated by the pern~itted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of
the General Plar.,
ny Th~~t four persons ~pp~;~~~ed in opposition to subiect. petition
R1-A _ 1_
~
i
t
".W~•:~s+~1, ~~~ ~----'_"---'-'----'-^~•~..e>e-r . . ~--' -- -- n~.oiw+...v~:-;,r,nt~
' . ~ . ' , ' ,iB+C~t ~ ~~, ~ ..
~
.,.'~:flMfa
,
~
,
r~
, c.
Nnw', 1'HF:RFFpR~~ ~3(; [T RESOGVE[~ that the Anaheim City plenninq Commisaton doPS hereby recommend
ta the C:ity Counr.il ot the Clfy ~( Anehcim that aubJect Petltion for R~cletaelflcaNan he approved ~nd, by so doing,
thet 'Citlc 18-7.on1nR of tl~e Aneheim Munlcip4l Code be omendad to exclude the above deacribed property from the
I~ ,. ~1NE~ FAM1[.Y RI'SfUFN1'TAI, Zl1P1E. ;,nr! to incorpo:~tE~ ~;.~1,1 descrihed properly tnlo the
~'~r); ~'OM~'~E;(1C1A1 (~k~FICf~, 7,O~dl', ~;~.,oi, r.t:~, ~ollowiny r.~md3tion~ whl~h ~~ra~herF:~bv fbur~~i to 1>e
. .1 f1PC ~~;i'' ~.' V~: f'l~T'f~t~l1 f'~ 1~ C? ~.0 f.f~',l: f),' 0~.~(lSQ(~ ~.I';F? O~ `'„11r ~r, ~
`' ~11:1y ,+fl(~ l~(!Il(l:11 WN. `•!i(t UY F ~' „, C~. ( Ll~ 1, E`'r'QE)t.C(,V 1fl ordc~r ln nresecve ~fiC~
h~~ :l izF.,, the ty ot An,ih,~im~
i 'fh•~t, i:he iise of the eY+.~;t.ln~~ s~~~actt,:~ ;h~ili con(crm !.o I.he Unitorm [ititldirig C~~clr_
~~ icli~E~!iacJ hY thE~ ('lty oE' Ai;.jhelm
?_ .~I'f:.~t. Con~li tior, No ;, ~t:ovt~ mentior,a~cl~ sh., i l t~,e c.ompl iec) wi l:h wi thin -~ period nf
18U d~y ; from i,h« d ~te hc~rfaofy ot ~,uch (;:z!.her t.irne ~~s t.he C1 t.y Co~,~ncil may qr~int .
3 ~Cf•~,~r, ~~ f, fc,~ot .l~~cor ~~t.ive ni-~~,c~nry w~ii, ~:~~t. k;.ick 3 fF~et frorn t.he
st~ill be con,l.iuct,ed i,ang t.he f•airh,,ven Strrret front ~q~~ of Subjec~ ~ro~ert.y liney
'~ foot. ~~ci~F~ o( ~~~r,ci '~~~twoe,~ lhe sidew:~;k ii~d ir,.~sor,r.y w~Ai •;hjll bH ~I;~nd~c,ped1int,~ccaid.
ir~ce with ,~,?.~~~ s~it>iTiitted to .~nd sut;~ecl, l~ tr~e _,p~:j~ov,;L of t.he au~erintendent of Pazkwav
M+int.enin~.e, ~r;d t:h,~l s~id „in~l,r,.ap.inq ,;~3i1 b~~ ir~.t:,~l;~'ci p;.io:: t.o (in;~i huilding tnspec;tion
THG FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signcd and epproved by me this E3°.'r~, ra.~y of :;e~~~~i,~her ~965
/ ` M _`
/ ~
~\' ~~ y~ !
y
/ ,
AT•rESZ~:
-- ~."'~'.t ..~.. / j~. ~~~.
~ //
SECREI'ARY ANAHEIYI CITY YLANNING COMMISSIOM
STATE l2F CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY Qr ANA}jEIM )
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM ~1TY P(,~NING CQMAIISSION
V
I, N~;;~ ~ 1 ek" , Secretary of the City Planning Commissiun of the City of Anoheim, do hereby certify that the foce-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of thc City Planning Commission of thc City of Anehelm, !.~ld on
~~~yiast :~f)Y 1~1F,~~, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Al:red, Camp, G3uEr, Herb,t, Rowlar~d, Munyail>
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None..
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F'erry:.
IN WITNESS 1~}-lEREOF, I heve hereunto set my i..,nd this 8=~. d•?y of September, 1965~.
_~~~j~i. .y •'.-~ ~~~l~`-'~/'
p S~CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI3SION
kESOLUTION N0, 1 "159
~ u2-A -2-
.
~
~
~