PC 1965-1966-1761~
'f
RGSOLUTION N0, l l(~1, ~FR[E; ]9G`.~•-66
_--._.__.
A Rf:SOLUTION OF THF CITY pLANNING COMM1SS10N OF THE CITY Or ANAI-~EIM
RECOMMENDING TO THG CITY COUNCIL OF THC CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~'~T[TION FOR RECLASSiFICATION N0. ~.;~•-G~ ~~b,_ gE APPROVF;D
.. :tir~ ~
~ , ~
i
WFIEI2EA5, the City P(nnning Commission ot the City of Anaheim did receive p verffied Petitien tor Reclae~lfice-
tion Erom WAR(?EN M Al~l? ~1ARCFLLA IiAI~NIIII.I., 1847 West: K~~Cella Aven~_~e, Anaheim~ Californla, Owi,ers;
"fIC TCiC ~+MftKC'l'S, I~CORPURA'fE~l.~~ 12311 C~,~pinan Avenue, GardE~n Ur~ve, California, ~.yent, of certain
re~il property sf.tuated iri tlie Cil.y or An•~hein~, County o( Ur~~nge, St,ate of Calif~iy~ia, ~esci•ibed ~~s
that porLion af t_he SC~Uf:I1N~esl, c~~~~~rt,er aC Lhc Southe~ist. yuarter of S~cCion 20, ?c>wn~;hir~ 4 So~at.h,
Il,:~nqc 10 Wc~st, in t.he R~~ncho l.o, .'oyates, ;is Lhe Soi.i~.he.i,t yuar~.er oE said Secti on 2U Is shown on -~
; map filed in b~ok l'7, F:;~yc, ?~, ftecoid of ~;urveys, in the otfice of ±1ic Coptt^ty f2~corder of s~id
`county, ci~~~;r„r•it,ed ollc~ws: Fieginning •3t .~ poinC an f.hF~ South lj.ne of ,~id Sc+uLhwe~t quarter of
~he 5outh~ ~st ~~ua~ ~.~ ni st ~;,t thereoi~ 55. feet Ea~,t of the Southwest ~;orner. af s.aid Soulhwest
; qunrLcr of ~he Southe,j•,t ~~u.irf~~, ~ thenc.c~ N~~rth "3~>O.UO feet p,~rallel with thtp V7ss l line oF s~~id
5outhwe~.t ~au~rter of th~ Soulhe,~,~ ~au.~rt~~r~ thence ~ast 109~.00 fc~et p-~r~llel' with th~ South line of
,aid 5outhwest uua.rter of the Southeast ;u~~rter, t,o the East line of th,e West ha lF of the 5outhwest
r~uarte~ of the Southe~~st rau.irterS I.hence ~outh 35Q.,OQ fee! ~tong said ~ast l.ine t.o the 5outh line
of said Southwe~l: ~~u~irter of tllB Soutf~east ~~u:~rCer; t.f.ence Wesl, i09.00 feet along saicl SouLh line
to the point of beyinning
; and
WHEREAS, the City Ptanning Commisslon dld hold a publlc hearing at the City Hell !n the Clty of Anoheim on
Auyus;, 30, 1965, et 2:00 o'clock P,M. notlce of eaid publlc heering hnvfng been duly given as requltad •by
]nw end ie accordonce with the provisione of the Anaheim Munlcfpal Code, Chepter 18,72, to hear and coneider evldence
for and agalnst said proposed cecleseificetion and to investlgat~~ and meke findings and recommend~iona in connectlon
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commiosion, after due lnspection, investtgetion, end study mede by ltself ~a.d ln ite behalE, and
efter due consideration of ell evidence end reports ofEered et sald hearing, does find end determine ~s following facta:
1. That the petitioner proposes e reclassification of the above described property from the R•- li~ Agrlcul tural
"I_one to the C-1, Gener=~1 i;ommercic~l, Zor.e to est~blish a neighboihood market and an office
buil,iing ,
2~ 'fh3t the prapnsed Tec:assification, if approved, consLitules such a minor deviation
th,~t no imJnediate ~r~~n~lment to the General Plan is necess~ryt hawever, its r~elationship to
the existing General Pl3r symbol will be considered in the next annual revie~v,
~ That the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is necessery end/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per development of thc communitv.
4 That the proposed reclassi;icntion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and thelr petmltted
uses ]ccally establi5hed in close proximity to subject pro~erty and to the zones end thetr permltted usea gerterally estab-
lished throughoat the comcrunity.
5, Tt~at th.e Fzoposed reclassification of subject pc•operty d~es ;eq~iire d~dication foi•
and S t ifli~ 3 Crf iinprovemen t o f abu t t. i ng s t.reets bec.3~~se s~ id p: oper ty ,;oes re1.3 te t o and abut
upon streets ar,d highw.~ys which are proposed to carry the type and ~au3ntity of trafftc, which
wili be yenerated by ±he permitted u~es, in accordance with the circui:tian element of the
Gener3l i'i,~ri
h'I'F~at no one app~<~red in opposition to subject petit.ion
;
I
~~ ~
~
i
~
R 1-A
-1-
~
~
f
~ ~~
FI.
;:>~ ~ ~
1
~
1
I
1 ^
~
~
.,' ._ ti. ..,
N014', TfiF,RL~QRE, DE iT RE:ShLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenninq Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Councll af the City of Anahelm that eubJect Petitlon for Recleaeiticetion be approvod and, by so doing,
thst Titls 1R•Zoning of the Anaheim Municipnl Code be emended to excludo the ebove described property (rom the
I~•A, Ag1icuitura~, Lone. ~3nd ko trrcorpor~~te said descrtt~ed propWrt:y 9nto the C•], General
Cotiun~rci•~1 ,~one, upor~ t.he Col lowinq condi t, i oiis which are hereby found t.o be ~ necessary
K,t~~reyutsitt~ to the propose,,d ~,ir,e of subjccf, ~roperty in orcier to preserve l;he ^„~foty and
genei ~l walf,ire of lh~.~ c~1LIzE~n; of t,lie~ City of Anahcim: ~
l.. That• the ownrr of subject pi~opei~ty shall ciee~l i.o the~ ~:ity of Anaheim a sLi-ip of land
60 feet in width, Irom the centerline oE the street, ,~lonq Kateil~ Avenue, for street widening
~ur.poses, Including a 15-foot r~idius r,ocner retur.n.
2-, Th~t s~reet irrprovement pl.~ns sh.~li be prepared :~nc~ ~~11 engineering requirements of
t.he Gity of Anaheim alc~iy Katella Avei~ue, such as curbs ,~nd gui.lers, sidewalks, street qr~ding
~nd p,iving, drain~ge f-~c1!it.ies, or ~ther cippurtennn~ work ~h:~ll be complet~ci :~s required by
the Cit;y ~ngineet- and in ,iccordance wttt~ stand~ard pl~ins and specitic;r,t.ions on file in the
offi~e of tt~e c:it;y Enyineezi oi• t,h~at .~ I~qnd in ~in :.imount ;~nd forir ,~tis(~~ctory to the City of
An~~heim >hill be poste~f wilt~ the Cii.y to gia:~r+~ntee ~,Il@ insi.;.~llnt.~on of s-3id rngineering
rec~u i rE~men t s,
:3., T'h it the owner oC ~,ubjec,t. propet!Y :h~ll p•iy l.o t.he Ci ty of Ai, iheim the sum of 22 .00
per fi•orit Eoot along K,~t.e1: ~ Avenue ,incJ F~3~y W,~y, for strc~et lighf.ing purpo5es
40 1'h~t i:he owr.er o( c;ubjec:t propei!.y ;h,~ll p~~y 1:o tt7e City of Anatieim the sum of 151
per fzont. Eoot ilong Katel:.i Avenue ,~ncJ Easy W.~y, for. Ltee ~il.~ntinq purposes,
5„ 1'h~~t t.r ~;h sl oraqn .~re:~s sh ~i i be provlded in .3ccord_~n~.e wit.;~ -~~proved p1 ins on
file with Lhe ofEice ~~f the Di.7ecl.or~ oE Pubiic Works, pzlor• 1o final l:~,iiding inspection.,
6, 'I'I~.~t Cor~ditio~~ N~, 1, ?y ~., -~nd 4, ,~bove in~ntioneuy sh,+ll be compiied wi~h withln
~ pez•iod oE i80 d..~y~ from tne clr~t:e F~e-•eof, or ,uch further tiirie ,~s the City Councii. m;3y grant.
7~ ~hal ~~l i~i.r. ~ onc1: F.ioninq f~cii f tie5 ,I1;3~ j he p~op~; ly s~~1rlraPd frorn view from
_~hutt.ing street.(s),prior to Cin~l buiiding inspec,tion
8. Ttr.~t sub~ect t:uperty ,h.~ll be developed ;ubst.~ntialiy in accordance with plans ancl
speciCir.itions on file wifi~ r.he City of 4n-~hei~ti~ m3iked Erhibi! Nos ~, ~, 3, q~ ,~~~~j ~
THE FOREGOiNG RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this r• 3y of SeF te~r.t~er. i965
~ . ~if/~i~ ~
---_.._
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CI1'Y ANNING COMMISSION
F~TTEST:
~.
I ~.~..~-,-~i T`~' ~ .~ ..
I ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIb1 CITY PLANNING COMM1SS10N
I ~
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
I COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHETM )
~ I, Ann Ki~ebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission o£ thr City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
I ; going resolution wes passed and edopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
~ ` ' Augus t 30, lgh5, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
E i
AYES: COMMI~SI~~;vGRS: ~llred, C~mp, Gauer. Herbst, Rowland, Mungal.l
• I
j NOES: COMtdISSIONERS: None ~
~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~e: ry.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hercunto set my hand tl~is St.F~ day of September, 1965...
~
+ ` ~~, `^ ~~~ ~
_ ~. ,;~
j a SECRETARY ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
''' ~ ~• RESOLUTION N0. ] 7f~1
::<:' 1
R2-A _2_
;
` r
~ •~..W;y„~,, -
~ ~r
qR" S . „ ' tf -'~:1 • ~ ~
'JM". . ~ ~ i. , ~ !~ `
_'.h'..-~. I .
~ .
~.J_'.I. ~ ~
~