PC 1965-1966-1854A. M
.i
RF;SOLUTION N0, 1854, S~RIES 1965-66
.--__.._..~_.___-_
A RES0I.UTION OF TNE CITY pLANNWG COMMISSION OF THG CITY ~F ANAHEIM
THAT PETI7'ION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1'143 BE GRANTED IN PAI~T
WNEREAS, tho City Planning Commiaeion ot the City of Aneheim dld tecelve A verifled Prtltion for Varlance
from Ei.L.A M. RICE, c/o Stephen F. Gall;~gher, 106 North Cla~dina Street, Suite 30, Anaheim,
California, (~+vner; CARRIAGE ESTATE~~ SA[.ES COftF'URA7~IC~1, 1521 ~ast 17th Stxeet, Suite I,
~anta Ana~ California, Agent of certain real pr~perty situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, described as the north half of the west half of the
south half of ;,he southwest yuarter of the northwest quarter of secti~n 16, Township 4 South,
.~ ~~ Range 10 West, being loi: 13 of I~lelen and I.ynch's Subdivisi~~n of the west half of section 1G,
; T'ownship 4 South, Range 10 West of the San Hernardino meridi~~n as
;,~ 442 pag~ 158 of Ueeds in the office of the c~unty recorder of !os Angelespcountya~Califo~nia
's
~\ , .
I
;,, ~ ; end
; ' WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commisslon did hold e public hearing nt the City Hall !n the City of Anehetm
~ on November 22, 1965, et 2:OQ o'clock P,hl., notfce of s~id public hearing haviag been duly given ea required
by law and in accordence with the proviaions of the Aneheim Munic~pal Code, Chapter 18,68, ta hear and conaider
~,.I evidence for end egainet said proposed varlaece end t~ investigate ~nd meka fl~din s and recomme
i tton therew1th; end B ndatlonE in connec-
I
i WNEREAS, exid Commissi~n, ~ft~r due inspectl~n, investlgetlon, and etudy made by itself and in lts behalf,
end after due considerotion of all evidence end reports oEtercd a t geid h~aring, does find end determine the followIng
fects:
*
~1Y•
`~° That the cequested verience is necessery for the preservAtion end enjoyme.-; of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the semc vicinity and zone, and denied to the rtoperty in question.
5., That the requested veriance will not be meteria;ly detrimental to the public welfate or injueious to the prop.
erty or improvements in such vicinitV and zone in which the property is located.
6a That'.two ~perso~s~ appeared ~nd a petition s igned by• ~ property ow~ners was received in
oppositiony and that one rerson ac,pe~red in favor of subject petition,.
~i
i
~
f.
t~
,f
1
~i
1~
I
...,_.;
I
I
~
r+^' ~
:t,t ~
1. That the petitioner requesty e varience from the Anaheim Municipal Codr.: Se;:t.ion 1~,?_fi.0)C(5-h) ~r;h1; ~~
requires ;ingle storyrconstrurtlon ~vithi~ 150 feet, ~( R-1, Une F~~~~ily Resl~ential and R-A
Agriculturat, Zoned p.ope:ty to clevelop suhje~~ pro~;~rty ~~rit_h two ;i,ory r,onstrur,tion to a poinl
~n~hir~ 135 feet from the R-1, pro~~erty t,o t.!~e F~ast ~~:~cf v~itf~in 1=~G feet. ot H-~+, Aqrlrultural.
7.oned property to the svuth.
._. That ~rJaiver of the one st~ry lieiqht limitation ~.;~ithin 1`.:,~% f~-~~t of the R-1, One F~;~;~ily
Residentialy Zone to the east f~ereby denied, based on Che Foct that the reyuested waiver
would be an encroachment on tr~~_ .rivacy ~f the residents to th~ east of s~bject property.
3. That waiver of the one story Iiei~~hf; li~.~it~at,i~n •rritf~i~, 15p ~e~,t of tl~e R-P,, Aqricult.ur~] ,
Zone to the south is hr,~reny qranted, b~sed on the f,.~, tF~at. tlii~ Nr ~rt y o:-r:~er tc ! h~ ~•,~,~t 1;
stipulated that he did not oF;~pose t~~r~o stor c ,, '~ ~
y onstru~:ti~n adj~i~r.~t t.o hi~ E~roF:eriy.
V 1-G
.J
L
~
,._::`.~+It'~
~
~i~ 1 ~
_` 3
~;
~
NAW, THEf2EFOR~, HE I7' RESALV~U that the Anehelm Clty Plenning Comr~~leslon doea hereby deny tt~e
rcyuE~st Po.r waiver of the one sLory height limit~Lion with9n l5p fett of the R-1, One Family
Residential, Zone to the easi~, based on the foregoing findings~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ~.he Anaheim City Planning Commission doec hereby grant sub,ject
Petition for Variance of L•he on~ story height lirnitation wit:hin 150 feet oF the R-A, Agricultural
Zone to the south, upon thr following conditi~ns which ar•e hereby Found to be a necess~ry
prerequisitc to the propos~ ,e of the sub,~ect prope.rty in order to preserve the ;;nP~ty and
genera.l welFare of the Cit:.._. ,; of i;he Cii;y ~f .4rahe~m.
la '1'h~t a Final Tract Map of sub,ject ~rope.rty be approved by the Cii.y Council and
.recorded in the office oF the Orange County Rec~:rder-.
2~ Th~{; this Variance is gr;~ni;ed sub~jpct to the com~letion of R~classifica{;ion
No~ G5-66 •50~
THE FOREGOING RE;SOLUTIbN is signed and epproved by me thta 2nd of December, 1965~
~~
/ , !~r•c.(..t,c~~~~~""_ '
,
.i
i
i
j
~
1
,
I
~
• :I
~1
,,;.;
`,
.' ~;
~
~
: ~
~.~
A
.1
; ~.
i
1
~
~
(i,i~.i
f~;..,:
t,.c:
=~i
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P
G%G~ l~t'-~/'~ i~~f..~G~/
~
SECRETARY AtIAHEIM CiTY PLANNMG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COtJNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
COMMISSION
I, Anr, K_ el.-s, SecrPtery of the City Planning Commission oE the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify the4 the fore-
going resolution wes passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, held on
November 22, 1965, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Alired, Camp, Gauer, I-ierbst, DAungall, Perry, Rowland~
NOES: COMMIS~IONERS: N~ne,
ABSENT: C04IMISSIONERS: ~1one.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 2nd day of December, 1965~
RESCLUTION N0. 1854
V2-G
~~' f -- /
__-..
~ ~. , ~ ,7'~; r ~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~
n