PC 1965-1966-1873R~SOI,UTION N0,_,. 1F373, SkikIF.S 1965•-66
A RESOL.UTION OF THE CiTY PI.ANNING COMMISSIUN OF THI: CPCY OF ANAN
RECOMMENDING TO TNE CITY COUNCIi. OF THE CITY OF ANAHE'IM TfIAT
f~ET1TI0N FOR RFCLASSIFICATION N0. _ 65~bG~-62 Df Af'F'RC)VEU
. _..: w~t4o.
i
' ~~
•\ , ,
i
i
~,. i
~
WHEREAS, the City P:anning Commiasion of the City n( Anehelm did ir~itiale ~i ver.ified f'etition for
Reclassification on cerl;.in real proparty situated in the City of Anoh~~irn, Co~anty of l)r~.inge, S~ate
of California, dcscribed as Parcel 1: Lots 1 through "7, incluslve, of the Regier Suhdivision, as
shown on a Map recorded in C?ook e;, p~~ge 37, Miscellaneous Map,, records of Orange County, :~nd Lots
. 4~ 5~ 7, 9, 12, 13 and l4, in Block ~- of Uavis E3i•others ` Addilior to An~~f~,elm, a, ,hown on a Map
.'~. recorded in {3ook 2, pages 632 and ~,33 of Misrel laneous Record, of l.o, Angeles Count.y, California;
~°"~`Exce{~ting from said l~ots 12, 13 and 14, the Westerly 10,00 {eet now included wif.hi.n Narb~r L~oulevard
`! forrrerly Palrn 5treet; Parcel 2s l.ots 1 throuyh 14, inc 1 usive, in alock l), of ~avis Hrothers'
';Addition to Anaheim, as shown on ~ Map recorded in fiook 2, p g
'Tof l.os Angeles County, California; Excepting the WeStez•ly 10~00sfeel of~~Lots~l0ithrough~l4, nowUr~;
'included within Harbor l3oulevard, formerly f~alm Street; Also ExcepCing the Southerly IU.,UO feet
; of Lots 5, 7 and 9, now included within S~nta Ana Street
; and
W}{FREAS, the City Plenning Commissfon did hold n public hearing c+t the City Fiall in the City of pneheim on
December 6, 1965~ at 2tOn n'clock P,M., notlce oE snid publlc henring hnving becn duly given es required
by law and in ecr,ordance with the provfstons of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chnpter 18.72, ta hear nnd consider evi-
dence for and egainst said proposed reclassification and to inv~stignte end m~ke (indings And recommendations in
connection therewith: and
WHEREA3, soid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, nnd study rnade by itself ~nd in its behnlf,
nnd n[ter clue co~sideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hec~ring, does find and determine the following
fects:
' ~
_, ~
I
~~ ~
*
; ~
~
1
S
..;:;:
1.Thatthc Comi.is•,:;;r, ~.:~f,~~a•, ~, ;e;:ias•~ift_ar,nr, ot ~hr_ :,:c~e ie~;.ri~c,~ ~;.operty from the
R-2 and R-3, Muiriple Far~iiy Residential, 2ones to ttie G1, Gene;;~l l:omme~~;.ialy Zone in order
to enable subjecc properties to devel~p for more apE,ropriate land uses.
2. That bec~3u.e st,udies condu~ted in conjunction Nith 'the Cent~r Gily analysis indicate
that properties in close proximi~ty to thc ~'i~ti~ic Center wou.ld bes±. k:e used for busines~ and
professional offices, it, is deemed that subject property be rec.l~ssit'i~d t,~ the C-0,, Commercial
Of'f ice, Zone.
3. Tf13~ Area Developmen;; Plan No. 25, which was considered in conjun~tion w.:Ch the
proE,osed reciassification, indic~tes that it i~ adv:sable tc ~~n~o~,raQe land as;emb;y of
in.ii~~iduai parce;s and t.he mainten~~nc~ o` the minim~~m 2,000 :;quare t'cot ~ ~rce, s~Fas ac,
~ie~iynai.ed in the C-0, Zone~
~ That the uses for suF;jec•t piopeit .es r_ould be f'or p~b] ic ~n:i semi-F,~bl ic; use t~:~qe'ther
with high r lse commercial crf' ice st,r~~rtures and, thec ef ore, wouid hc moT e complementa~v te
the Civic Center. •
5, That three persons appeared representinr. interested ~,roperr,y owners, ro express their
opinions on the ~i•oposed reclassitiication~
R1-A _1.
-- _ ~ _.~.__r_~,___,r -- ---~---- --- -- - ~ .,..~....~, .
. .., ~ ~~;_~~;:
_~ l
_ ,~
\ ~
I
~' ti
•~ _
I.
i
~i
~
~I
~i
,~
~I
.i
j~
,' 1
~
.....;
~ .
;i
, .~x.
.. ;
-
~
-"'.-1
, ,-_:
;~"_'`1
r:
NOWy 7'flC:k~FORf;,, Hi: I'f RESOI.V~:q t.ha~ t.lic~ City Planninr~ C;c~nuniti:,ion ~loe:; f~erehy racc~rmnend l,o
LI~~E~ c:it.y Co~incil ot' I,he Cit,y of~ An~heirn lhat the E~ropo5e.~ci re~;l~~sr~ifi~~ ii,ion i.o ~,he G_~, Grner~~l
Commerc ial., Zon~~ k~~a 1 i~apF,roved F~,i~;~~l on l,he Corego inq f i;ulings.,
HF 11' (~'Uft`CfifiR RF.SpLUf:b t.h~~t tfiF CiLy Ptanniny Commi ssion ~:lc~t;; herrl,y ic~~:ommonci t,~ thc: Cit:y
Cotanci .~f t.he G i l,y af An:ihe irn kli,~t sUl~jec t pz~oper t. i as bc rer. 1~~:~s i f' ie~.~ -.o t.he (;-U, ~ornrre~r~~ i al
Ot'Fic~~, Zor,~~ cis t~einq Ll~c~ hi<~hc~:;l ;.3nd Lr ~ i u~,t~ Por• ~~al,'~~c• ~
J .~~roF,et f.y .,nd l,y yr~ doinq, th,.~t 'J'itlc~
1•-"Loritnc~ o!' the Anaheim Mi.ini~,ip:il Ca:l~~ b~ amend~~d I.o exc lude t.hr~ ~il»ve ii~sc.r.ibed F~rop~rt.y ftom
t.he R-;y M~altiple Famlly R,~si~Jer~tiril, Zane ,ind R-.'3, Multiple I=ainily -t,.,,icientir.il, Zone, subject 1.~
Lt~e f'o1lc.ving con~.iilions ~,n~h:r:h ~x~e I~ercby found tc~ t~e a n~ce:;~,arY F,rc,~rc~quisite to lhe F~roposed
~.~se o!' :~iabjeci. ~~ropt~i•ly in or~~er lc~ px•eserv~:~ t.h~~ ~~afety ~r~ci c~r~r~c~t~;l welf.~rca o~' t.h~ Clt,~zen~; of
the Cif,y o!' An~I~elm,
lo I'h,71 lhe o~~,r~iers uf si.ihjeci: ~;ro~~erty sh;ill ~ieed t:o I.he ('ity c~f' An:~heim ;.~ sl,riE, af' land
4`7 f'eeL in ~vidt,h, frorn r.h~~ ccntrr line of t.h~~ strc~el,, along l~larhar l~o~ilcv,irdY for s~treel wi~leniny
, pu.t ,ose~, lnc lud inq r.i 24~-~t o~t t;id iur; co1 r~er r~~lurn ai. Ht o~~i~,vay anci ,~ 15-~fovl r~riius corner relurn
,`t ~~~t ~:lrn Sl,~reet and 5anta Ana ~l1 aE~t ,.
~I '? 1~ I'hal the owners u: ~.;;:bject F,ropert.y sh;il l rieec; t o~.he ~:I! Y of An,~heii i5•f ~~ot r;~.l~us
", r,orner rel.urn~~ ,~iony fle:en;i S;ie,~a;, ,3t Hraa:~w~~y, f-:lrn :~t.reet and S~~nt,;3 Anr~ ~tre~i
~~ :i., That the ownecsof sut, e, t, ~~r~ CrL h~~ll c1r~d l.a lhe Cily of An,iheiin ~:i s!,rip of land
," 34., 75 1'eet in wid~h F; om t:ht. ~~~ ~;.,~ Y.' '
, ~ n r T ., ~ne af the street ,.31onc3 S~~n i,a An,a Stxeel, For s i r eet
' w~d~n tnc~ u7 poses„
a,~ ~hat t:he :;idewaiks, •:•~aTk~:~ ~~nd gu*~e.r:; sha,l k~e I'~~)J1!'@r: ai any f~lriri~or Boulevard, Helena
1 Stree t, Hroadway,, Elm Strae~ ~rid a.~nL<~ Ana Stceet,, as ley~:ired by the Cit.y ~~~yji~P~,t. ,~nd ir accord-
ance ivitli s t~nda; d plans and ~pe:.: if' ical,ions on f I le in t.hE~ of f ice of the City }~,nqineeY~..
5„ That 1'r,~;h stoc;,qe ~ci.~~,s ~;hal ; be provicled in ~3ccorrl~~n:;e v,~(th appr.oved pl~ns on file
with the office of the Dl:i~'•tor ut Pub;ic Works.
ti„ T1~-it. C,ondit.ion Nos,. 1, ~ and 'i, ~~bove ment.ioned, shal l be ~om~~~ ied witli wit.hin a period
oC 180 da ~s from the dat,e hr~I~:~f', or SUrFI furt.her t:ime as ihe Cl;y Co,~n~~il m~y gi~~~~r.,
~• ~'h~t ('ondition No. 4., above mentioned, sh.31: be <,ompiie~i wit.h E~r io: to fln.il huildin
inspection~ ~
TFiF FnRE~',OING RE~SOLU~~TON i:; -; iqne:l r,nd app:~,~ved i~y m~e tt~i s _~ ~ d y~ o! Der,enit~er~, 1965~
~! 7 i ~ ~i'L~,~ r c.~/,.,~;%~,' ~
~"-4IRNA. ANAfIFTM CITY PL NNING CAMMISSIQN
ATTE:S1'r
--„y,,' ` ~_ / ; ,
SF.CR}~.CARY ANAHFiM CTTY PLANNIP,~ !~OMMI ;ION
STA'1'~. OF CALIf~RNIA l
UOUNTY OE~ ORAN ~r= ! ~s:s,
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
IY Ann Kiebs, ~ecret~z•y ot the City P~anniny ~'ommiss :.on of '.he C,~.y nf~ Ariaheim„ do t~er.eby
' ~ertify that the toregoinq r2su.ui.iun ~n~as pas~;ed ard adopted nt c+ rr~ee; iny_ of' t;he rity Ptanning
Comr~is;ion of the City of Anaheirn, I,e?~ on De~ember 6y i9r°~, at. ::•c_)~,? 0~,,,~;•k p.,M~, ~y the
ful lowing vote of the ~uemb?c s ~hc:: ~~,f ;
• AY~' CONiMISS[ONFR;: Gamp, Gr.,ue: , Herbs t, Munga 11 y Per ~ y, Rowl a;id,
NOF.S: COM~MISSIONERS; iJone.
`AHSF1v'T. COAIMISSIONERS; A; lred.
IN WITNESS WHERF-0F, I have nereunto set ~~~y han~l this
I'
4
,i :
C
i'
~
i
i
W
~.
1
Res. No.,
*
16th day of December, 1965,
l~_/~, i ~+~ • ,
SECREI'AF Y ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING OOMMISSION
1~73
~
~