PC 1965-1966-1921~s
\ '', ~
;,
~
•
~
~
-.., . ~
.i: ;
RESOLUTiON N0.
1921, SE~IE; 1965-66
A RESGLUTI~N OF THE CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAIiI
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, ,@Q4 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commiesion of the Clty ot Anaheim did receive e verifled Petitlon foc Condltlonel
Use Permit Erom VJc:,E, INCOE2PORATED, 76U1 Crenshaw }3oulevard, Los Angeles A3, California, Uwner
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, 5tate of California,
described as beginning at a point on the center line of South Street North 74° 36' 05" East
111..50 feet from the Northwest corner of the land conveyed by deed recorded October 28, 1947
in Gook 1590, Page 187, Official Records, said corner beiny 5outh 74° 3G' C5" P~est 373.10 feet
from the intersectlon of s.3id cent.er line with the center line of Placent#~•AvenueR thence
South 15`' qg' 25" East 188./3 feet, p~ralle] with the west; line of said larnl to the Narthwest-
erly line of the land described in the deed to William H. Grebel, eC us., recorded July 3, 1948,
in E3ock 1663, Pages 397 and '39f3, Official Records; thence Nortl~ 74° 3l~' 05" rasl to the North-
ea,t corner of sai.d land; Chence Nor.th 0° 05' 15" West 195.SA feet along said center line of
Placer,tia Avenue to said center line of South Str.eet; thence South 74° 36' 05" West 261.60
feet to the point of beginning~ EXCEPT that portlon thereof that lies wit.hin the lines of
South Street, as shown cn s:3id Map ; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commlasion did hold A public hearing at the City Hall In the City of Aneheim on
January 31, 1966, nt 2:00 o'clock P,M., nctlce of aeid public hearing hpving been duly given as required by
lew and in accordance with the provisiona of the Annheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for and against sald proposed cortditional use end to investigete and make flndings and recommendetion~ in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investlgation, and study made by itselE nnd in its behelf,
and after due conaideretlon of all evidence end reporta ofEered at said hearinq, daea iind end determine the following fecta:
1. That ihe proposed use is properly one for which a Conditlonel Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
establish a drive in restaurant with waivers of: 5ection 1~i.04~03U(b-12) which would require
46 parking spaces For the propos~rJ cornmercial use, to permit development with 45 usable parkirig
spaces; Section 1~+~40.070(2-a-3) whict~ requires a minimum 10 Foot landscaped setback to
permit ~,o landscaping for a portion of the site; and Section 1~.40,070(?-a-4)which requires
~ G foot masonry wall to the reax of the 3 foot wide planting strip~~~hem 2~3rds of the
property in the block opposite said propPrty (South Street) is developed for single family
residential use.
2. That the piof;osed use would proiect considerable more commercial traffic onto a
local street (South Street), than those permii;ted by deed restrictions placed on subject
property.
3, Thai: the petitioner has not ~hown that a land use haic~ship exists in the development
of subject property For the professional and medical uses approved for the property when
rer.lassified to ~the C-1, Zone, and that the single family homes were in existence at the
time the petitioner purcf~ased the property.
4. That the C-1 deed restricti~ns placed on subject property were for the protection
of the single family home owners, in order that the permitted tises would be mor.e compatible
with the residential inteyrity of the area.
5. That the in;~erent noise and normal hours of operation oP the prouesed use will have
an adverse affect on the land uses established in close proximity to subject property.
6~ That two persons appeared, representing six per~sons present in the Council Chamber,
opposing subject petition.
-1-
i _.:~1.,~
i
h I
t A
~ /
I
I
i
,
~
~~
I
. .i
I
1,
;
;
~
' ~
: i
~Yl
i
;_ f -
~ -
i
, ~
i
~
. I
~
~
.j ~
, ;
_ i
i
~I' '
' ''; i
-;~ ~ ~
~ A 1
~
~ ~
~
~ I
i
~ i
. ~ ~w
.~~1,':~
~
~ ~
f~ ' _.~
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE I'C RESOLVED that thc An~heim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Condltionel Use Permit on the basis of the ~forementioned findlnp,s,
THE FOREGOING RGSOLUTION is signed and epproved Uy me this lUth d~,y of Februa.ry, 1966.
---'..- ~
ATTEST:
~~~~' ~ l~f.d,t
~
C}iAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P
~
ING COMMISSION
%i~ ~ '
, ,} .
/ ' ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIT`f PLANNING COMMISSIUN
STATE OF CALIFORIQIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of pnaheim, held on
1~nuai•y 31, 1966,. at 2:~0 o'clock P.M„ by the lollowing vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Nerbst, Mungall,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: perry.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T have herednto set my hend this lOth day of February, 1966.
/ /. . . %', - .~
~'~ "~' %~ ' - '
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1921
C2-D
..:.ttii ,
-2-
~
„
~