Loading...
PC 1965-1966-1954RGSOLUTION N0, 195A, SF.'HIES 1965-66 A RESOLUTION OF 'fF!E CITY PLANNMG COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PET1Ti0N FOR VARIANCE N0. _ 1762 BE GRANTED ~ ;~ _ ~ _~ ..., i i ; .: ~ ~~ ~ ~ * J4Y~ ~~ WH~REAS, the Clty Planning Commiasion ot the Clty oE Aneheim dld recelvo e veritled Petitian for Vatiance from I30YKIN B. AND IRENE L. NA12PEf2, 535 Victor Street, Anahoim, California, Owners~ LEW MONSON AND/OR RALPfI STEVENS, 10650 deach Boulevard, Stant.on, California, Agents of certain real property situatod. in the Cit.y oC Anaheim, County of Urange, 5tate of California, described as Lot No. 8 of Tract No. 1563 ; end WHEREAS, thc City P1Anning Commiasion did hold a publir, hendng et the City Hall in the Clty of Aneheim on February 28~ 1966, ~t 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public henring having been duly given ae required by law end in eccordanae with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter ]8.68, to hear end conaider evidence for and egeinat said proposed veriance and to investigate and make findings And recommendetions in connec- tion therewith; end WHEREAS, seid Commisslnn, after due inspection, inveati~ation, end atudy mede by itself and in its behalf, and efter due consideration of ell evidence and reporta offered at seid heering, does find and determine the following fects: 1. That the petitioner tequeats a varience from the Aneheim Municipal Code: Section 1~.RO,ORO whiCh requires a minimum floor area of 1,225 feet to permit construction of a second detached 935 square foot dwelling on subject property. 2. That there are exceptionel or extreordinary aircumstancea or conditions epplicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the propecty that do not epply generally to the property or cless of. use in the seme vicinity and zone. 3. That the requested verience is necessery for the preservetion end enJoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, and denied to the property in question. 4, Thet the requested variance will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfate or injurious to the prop- erty or 3mprovements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted, ~' ~~~lhP4eQ.I~s:~P1dt~~'r~.d ~.Y?)I R~1P~t~~}~Q~ ~tA'~s'~`,7~.'•~~~kP~.~-~:.,. ,• r~;:-:. V 1-G -1- ~ a M .~..,"3 .. , ~t •,;::t,~ . NOW~ THERF.F'ORC, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aenhelm City Plnnning Commieaion doee hereby ar~nt ~ubioct Petltlon Eor V~~lance, upon the ~'o11o~Ning conditlona whlch are hereby iound to be e necoe~ary pre~equisite to the pro- pesad u~e of the subject ptoperty ln ordor to preserve the eafety end generel weltare ot the Citisens of the Clty ot Anaheim. 1. That tt~e owners of subjoct property sl~all pay to the City of Anaheim thQ sum of $25.00 pPr dwelling unit (for i:h~ new unit only), ta be used for park and recr.eat.inn purpASes, said ' amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. ; 2. That sub~ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifical:ions on file wi1:h the City oF Anaheim, mark~d Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3. ,~ ~~ ,-.# _ ;i" ~~ G~ j ~ 1 ; ~ ; I ;,~ -_; .. '~r~' ~"1 .i ' ~~i , r ~ ~ . ~~ f _~ i , i ~ ~ ~ THE FOREGOING RESOI,UTION ie eigned and epproved by me t ie 1Cth day of March, 1966. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI COMMI ION ~ ATTEST: Pro Tem „~ ~' '1--~ - yti~7.Y?..r.~~-~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ ': I ~ ~= . u:. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretery oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fc,re- going reaolution was pesaed and edopted at e meeting of the Gity Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, held on February 28, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp, Gauer, Herbst, Perry, Rowl~n~, NOES: COMMTCC?~*;~~;; ~;o~,e. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~llred, Mungall. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this lOth day of March, 1966. / ' -~.-;~ -,',.~-! ~ ~ ~/, SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'I'ION N0. 1954 ,; ~~ ~:: ~'' ;I `, i "~"' ~ ,~ i i '~ _. ~ ',Y~~,. '` ~'~ w ,4 ~ :.;;4. .}~~: ~1 ~, i ..,~ ; ~~ .r~~ V2-G -2- k~ ~ ~