Loading...
PC 1965-1966-1957RESOLUTIO~ Nu, 1957, ;,;.,,[GS 19C~5~-Gl~ A RESOLUTION OF THE (:I'CY PLANNING ~OMMISSIQN OF TFfE C1TY OF ANAF(f;IM 1'HAT PI;TITION FOR VARIANCE N0, 1765 f3L' DE:NICu ~ '~ WHLREAS, the City P1anningCommiseion oE the City of Anehr.im did recrive n v~rlfled Petition for Vorlr+nce fmm RUBERT 6AR'fFfULUMEW GOR[X~N, 1G28 Sout.h 9rookhursi. Street, An~heim~ ~,allfornia, Uwnerq 7'fI~MA; M. MC DUNUUGI~{, 930 South Euc11d 5treet, Analleim, California, Ageni. of cert.ain rcal property situated in the City of Anaheim, t,ounty nF Or~'~n~~e, State of Calilorni~, dcscrit~ed r~s Lot 61, 1'ract 1781, as shown on ~ m.~p thereoE recorded In b~~ok 55, E~ages ;s3 ~+nd 34, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Ur~ange County ; ~nd WHEREAS, the Ctty Planning Commisslon did hold a public hearing et the City Nall in the City of Anaheim on February 28, 1966, et 2;00 o'clock P.M,, notice ot seid public heacing having been duly given a9 requirecl by lAw and ~n c+ccordence with the provislons of the Anehelm hluntcipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence Eor end against said proposed vnriance nnd to investigete and meke tindings and recommendations ln connection therewith; end WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and ~study madc by itself and in lts behelf, ~nd F~~ter due cor,sideration of all ev[dence and reports otfered at said hearing, does find and detertnine the following fact~: 1. Thet the pntitioner requests n vc~rience from the Anaheim htuniclpel Code: Sectton 1~. ~A.O10, wfiicf~ ~:~r.ni:s only residential uses in the an R-l, Or~e Family Residential, Zone~ to establisl~ a beau;,y sf~op in an existin.g residence on sub,jert pro~erty. 2. 7'hat there a.re no exception,;i or extraordlnary circumstances or conditi~ns app) ica1~1~ to i:he property involved or ta the intendec~ use oz t}-ie property that do not apply generally to tl~e property or class of use in the sarno vicinity and zone. 3. That the requested variance is not i~ecessary for the prese:~va'ion and enjayme~ t of _a substantial property right possessed by other proper~ty in the sarr~e vicinity and zone, r:,nd denied to the property in qiiestion. 4. That the proposed use would encouraqe commercial en~roachment into an area ~Nf~ich I~as single family residential develor:nent co the north, east, ind souCh of subject propcrly~ 5. That strip commercial land use should not be ~ncouraqed or permitCed for the residential stz•uctures and properties fronLing oi~ Brookhu.rst St:r~et in this area. 6. That Lhe propused commerc:ial use of subject property w~uld I~ave a delet~~rious ef'ft~ct on the existing re~ldential environment and character of the ar~:-~. 7. T1:at dedication of P~ookhurst Street to its ullimate r:qht-oE-~ay widtf: wo;'_c~ reauirf~ relocation or removai of the cxisting structure. ~. Thai: one person appeared and presented a petitinn signcd by ]9 propetty owners in opposition, and une person appeared in favor of subjECt ;~etition. ~ V1-D .i ~` i ~ ' ~. 1 :i .. ..~ -1- x~ i ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ; ; ~. ~ ~ -.i I I , ~ , ~ i i I ~ , 'i _i ^~t i i ; j I ~ I ~i ; ~ i ~• , 1 i NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESO[.VED that the Anoheim City Planning Cornmission does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the besls of the aforementloned findtngs. THE FOREG0ING RESOLUTION is slgned nnd approved by me this lOth day of March, 1966e ~ ' CHAIRMAN ANAHFIM CITY PLANNING CO MISSION Pro Tem ATTEST: _ ~/ i ~ ' - l '- '~ 7~~v..~.0~% SECRETARY ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION STAT~, OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANANEIM ) I~ AnJ1~~lf~@}~eM Secretery of tht City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fote- going cesolution wns passed and adopted at a meeting oE the City Planning Commission of lhe City of Anaheim, held on February 28~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock p,M,, by the following vote of ~`° members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Nerbst, Perry, Rowland. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~Vone. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Mungall. IN WITNES~ WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this lOth day of March, 1966~ i~'l'r ,` t-~~ ~` <' f~ i ~ ~ ' SECRETAkY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CC.;IMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1957 V2-D -2- ~ ~