PC 1965-1966-1986F2F.SOI.UTION N0, 19~(>, ~1.R i}? ; 1~)(,~: _~~,
A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION UH 'I'Hh CI'tY OF ANAHEIM
'I'NAT PETITION F~R VARIANCE NO, ~%'_~1__ BE DENIE.D
_ ;eA~a
'~S
~ ' ~
.',
~
i'
I
!
_
i
,~ \
, i
~
~ Vd~
~
' `.. i
;
WHEREAS, City Plnnning Commis!,ion oE the City of Annhelm did receivc n verifled F'rUti~.>n for Varience from
GULF OIL (:URF~ukHl[UN, 18U1 Avenue ai the Su~~rs, l,o; Anqeles, C~:iliforni~3~ UW!IGI'; GEN[.RAf.
MAINTENANCE C~)MPAhY, f-'. C1, Box 5~~39, ;;uen~ Park, Critiforni:.i, Ayent of r,er±rilr, c~~,il property
sit;uat.ed in the Clty of Anaheim, County of Gr:~nye, State of C,~liforr~ia, as described in
Exhibit "A" attachecl hereto a~~;~ referred t,o herei.n ..~s t.ho~,gh sel, forth in full
; nnd
WHEREAS, the City Flanning Commission did hold e public heacing at the City Hell in the City of Anc~heim on
M"~~~~ ?~+ ~~~~b at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice ~f snid public henring hEaving heen duly givr.n ~s required by
lnw und in Accotdance with the provisions of the Anaheim 11u~icip~al Code, Chepter 18,fi8, to henr ~nd consider evidence for
;~nd agalnst said proposed ~~eriance and to investi~ate ~nd meke findingq and recommendntions in conne~tion therewith;
and
W}iEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, nnd study made by itself end in its behelf,
end nfter due considr.•retion of all evidence and reports offered at said heering, does find nnd determine the following
fect~;
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience from the Aneheim Municipal Code: ~{:;:! ion 1F~ 6:'.OU~'(;~ ~~n~~ 3) for
waiver of t:h~~ permitted maximum sign heigh~ of 53 ;~:et, to per'mi~, ~.,lgn i6 fect. ir, h~~:ight.;
Sor}.jnn 1r; F'`.,090(B-1) which permtts one ,,lyn,, to er~ct ;:3r ~,ddie;onal f:r~e•~,tanding sign; and
Section l~j~b7_.U90(B-5) which indi~;ates avhere s~~yn~; rray be lo:.ated ±o permit a sign to be erected
al.ong the east pl~operty line
?_•, That although the service :~t~tions ~,~hic~h ~3ie lor,ated in -~;ose proximity to subject
property have signs similar to thst being request,ed, cne of' tt;e serv,ce stations is undei lhe
jurisdiction of the County and the others ~.v~:~rE~ est:3bli:,~,e-,f~prior to thE~ adop~_ion oi the sian
ordinance, and that tt~is fai?s to prove a h~rr7shiE.~y sin,::c the existtna sican ~~ou1~3 be incrE:ased
in height tn fifty•-three (53) lee~., and in:re,,,E~d in area to :',C'~ ~;yua:e t~eety tfieret~yq a:c:omplisf~~-
ing adequ~te sigr:iny for subject property,
3„ That there are no er.ceptional v.r extraord'inr~ry cir~•u«•stances or rondilions appl~cable
to the property invo:Lved or to the intende~.i u,e o.'' the ~rro~ nrt.y th~it, c+o not ,~~.~piy aenerally to
tne property oi• ciass of use in t:he ~,ame vi;:;nii:y ;~r~d zone. -
4~ i'hat the height, sic~n ~~•e;i,, ;~r:d rn~mber oY siyr,', F~ermi+.tc,;~ ror :,~,,rv;i,e st~~f ion~ in the
M-1, Zone, ~.s set fo.rth in ~h~ sign or~.ii~,~nr.eY i, ~3dequ~3te~ ~n~i Lo ptrmi? ~;~e display u`' more
signs than is ~:le•a~ci in said z.one ~~,~ould set. an undesiz,3ble ,;re~eder~t. :'o! similar requests for
their establ ishment in other ~.i•eas of the A1 •, ~p~~~.~,
5 ~ That • no une ~~ppeared in oppos i I, ior to ~;~.ibje~; l, ~,e!. i l ior;
V 1-D,
-1-
. _;.t '~' ~ ".-_ ~ -M....~.-,T,y......e,,, ~,: -- - - ..++~...,, -
_. ~+
. . ..;;_ ' ~~rr, ~;,c~
. ,. L.
~e ~n~: nu c
~ulllarn~u loni Tillo AnoQoiien
~t,~• A ~ovnrop~ /~IItY felm
+:~ „hI 1 V11
' SCIIi;I)li I.i~; n
~ ~ ~~, .~" i .' :' .~ . i..~ . r ~ ~ ~
w
Premium S 359 .50
, r:rr~~G~a
Anwt~nt $280,000.00 Dato November '.3, 1y~:;3 aL ~;00 a.m. Policy No. 3S59b6
TNtiUillilt '~
GULr^ OIL CORl'ORATION~ OF CALIFOF,;IA, a:~c laware corporabion. ~/' ~~
~ ,;,
... .•~1
~
~ '; ~
I
i
I
;
' I.
i
;
i
_•~ ~
,~
1, Title to tlza est~tu or interest covared Uy this policy ~~t llie clato l~ereof is vested in;
GUL~'~` OIL CORPORATIOtJ QF CALIF'OR1~.IA, a DE:laware coxpora~ion.
''~ .
if ~
w8 , ~.
, .
Sl1PPLEMENTAL LEGAL DCSCRIPTION
VARIANCC ~JC, 1774
That por.tion of Lot 15, Block K of the Kraemei• Trac~ as shown ~n
~, map recorded in Book 12, pages 87 and 88 of Miscel~~~neous Records
of Los Angeles County, State of California, in the City of Anah~im,
County of Orange, State of California, described as followss
COMh1EVCING at the intersection of the centerline of Dowling Avenue
(83.00 feet in width) with the centerline of La Palma Avenue (83.00
feet in width); thence North 73~ 04' 36" East, alang the centerline
of La Palma Avenue, 203.00 feet; thence North 16° 55' S4" iVest
53.00 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of said avenue, said
point beir;~ 53.00 feet measured northwesterly at right angles to
said centerline, said point also being t`~e TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of
this description; thence North 16° 55' ~4" West, parallel to the
centerline of Dowl.ing Avenue, 150.00 feet; thence South 73° 04' 36"
61'est 150.00 feet to a point on the proposed northeasterly line of
Dowling Avenue, said point being 53.00 feet measured northeasterly
at right angles to the centerline of Cowling .A.venue; thence So~ith
16~ 55' S4" East, parallel to said cente.rline, 125.00 feet to the
point of tangency of a curve concave to the northeast, having a radius
of 25.OQ feet and a central angle of 89° 00' 30"; thence southeasterly
along said curve 39.84 feet to a point of tancency on the northwesterly
line of La Palma Avenue; thence North 73° 04' 36" East along said
northwesterly line 125.00 feet to the TRUE P~~INT OF BEGINNTNG.
,
r
~
i
~
~
,
I.
~
i
,. ~ ,
_ . ~ti
.j
_ ~
I ~
~
~
i; i
; ~,;
? ~ ' .~
- -- .
,r,,,,y ''~ ` ---._-___-..--~,.o..r;:;`;~+~-.,~~
, t ~ - -- ~ ~ ....~*.~+..r~,,,.:~..,,.
. . ..ir , ' icli!•;;,i~ a~.~~e
~'
~~
_..~'a.
j
~
~ t ~
I
;
i
~
~
~ _
i
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I1' RESOLVF.D thot the An~heim City Pl~nning Commission does liereby deny subject
Petition for Veriance on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE I'OREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ~nd epproved by me this 7th ~i:.iy at' April, 1U66.
~
AIR~4IAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh1MISSION
ATTEST:
/'/"G/G~//~'v %,
~~2 ~ ~~
SECRETARY ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOkN1A )
COUNTY OF ORAhTGE ) ss.
C[TY OF ANANEIM )
I, Ann Kz'Eb~~., Secretary of the City Plc~nning CommiSSio~ of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thc~t the tore-
going resolution was ~essed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission oE the Cify of Anaheim, helc~ on
March 2~y i966y at 2;00 o'clock p,M,~ by thE foilowing voteof the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herb,;t~,, Mung~~ll, Periy~ Rowl.jnd,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None,.
~i
i
~
l .
l
~
I
~~
M
~ i
: ~:
r
~
"..; i
~f,
i . :,.,
='i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of' AF:. 11, 1966"
RESOLliTION N0. 19Fi6
V2-D
/ i ~-' ~G ~ 'Y l/ ~~1lL C G'tG~~
SECRETF,RY ANAHEIM CI'I'Y PLANNING COMMISSION
-?-
~
r Z-- ~---- - __ _ -•- --•-^. --+_. ~--~,-.-,~-.o..~~
~!!~ , . ~ . ! . ~ . =«~pw.a.~:.vnvn
. . : .~.v'. • • y~ y't.M~..
~,~
N