Loading...
PC 1965-1966-1991~ RESOLUTION NO. ~~~~y SF.RI~S 19Ei5•~(iG A RESOLUI'ION OF TF1C CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF T}i~ C1TY OF ANAIiEIM R~PET TIONIFOF R CLAS IFiCATI0N1N0 ~ 5~{~~'"9`~Y ~}3E PPROVEHp T WFIEREAS, the Clty Planning Commisslon of tho City of Annheim dld recelve a verlfied Petition for Reclesaltlca- tion from XYZ INVF:STMEN"t FUNI), 5152 Beach I~oulF~vr~rd, f3u~n:~ F'ark, C~il. i fornia, l.,essee; MARJGRIE _ S~ CAMPE3EI,L, 4301 West Commonwealth, Suite H, Fullerton, Cali(ornia, Ayent of cert~~in real ~~ property situ~3ted in t.he City of Anaheim, County of U~~ange, St.~jt.c~ of G~lifornia, described as th.it portion of Lhe ~out,neast qu~rter af the southeast qu~.rt~!r of sect,ion 11, Tnwnship 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho I~os Coyotes, as per maE~ t~ecordeci ir~ book 51 p~g~ 11 of N,iscel- /'~ laneous Maps, in the of f ice of the county recorder of s<aid cuunty, descril~ed ,_~s follows: °'~ ; s aeginning at a potnt ~r~ the southerly .li.ne of ;;aid seclion, westerly 55~00 feet from the south- I east corner of said section; thence Nort.h 0° 11' 10" West 612,?_3 feet F-arallel with the East line of ~aid secCion to t.he beginning of J CUI'VB conc:~vr~ westr:~c Iy h,.~ving .~ radlus cf 2A72o00 ~ teeC; thence nort.herly alonc~ said curve Lo ~ llne p~~r,:~ilel wikh and northerly 150~00 feet from ; t,he Soult~ line of the nor the~~st qu~rter of ~aid suul,heast. r~uarter of the southeast quarLer; being the true point of ~eyinning; thence westerly 165.00 feet 31on s~~id ~ couthei•ly 150~00 feet, at, riyht angles to the South line of s:~id noqtheast~quarter. torllasthsaid .,outfi lineR thence eastez~ly alony said South line to th-_jt cert.ain curve described ahove; thence j northerly along said curve to the true point of beginnfng 'I _ .,; ~ ;1 ~ ; ~ ; and ~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on ,~; • j March 2~i y,966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M, notice of said p~blic hea~ing heving been dul,y given as required by ;.~:.,,: law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munici pal Code, C hap ter 1 8, 7?., to hear and r_onsider evidence ~'! ' . for end ageinst seld proposed reciassi(ication end to investigete end make findings and recommendatiuns i,i r.onnection '` ~ therewith; and .` ~ - °t : ~ WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalE, and ~` ' aEter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does Eind end determine the following fects: i ! 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassiEication of the above described property from the R•A,, Ag r i cv 1 tur,~ 1 y ~! Zone to the C-1, General Commerr_ial, Zene to establ i~h ~,c.~ik-~.,r~ re,t,~ucan!, on subject pro ert. , 2~ That tl~ie proposed reclassif'ication is in i:onfo:manr:e H~lth the Generai Flan. ~ y~ ,; ~ ~ ( • i i I I ~i ; 3, Thet the pcoposed reclessificetton of subject property is necessary and/or desireble (or the orderly end pro- + ' per developnrent of the community. ~ 4. That the proposed reclessificatton oE sub'ect ~ ~ 1 property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in c2ose proximity Lo subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses generally esteb- ' lished throughout the community. 5. That the ~ ( proposed reclas~if'ication of subject property does not require dedication for but does require standard improvement of abutting sLreets because said property does relate to and abut upon streets and hiyhways whic:ri are partzally improved to carry the type ~,. .I and quaritity of traff icy which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of ±he General Plan„ !; ~• That no one appeared in opposition to subject petilion~ -~ .~ _ * ,~ ~ , R-A -1" ~ ~~: `~ ~ . ti::v,~, ~ 1 ~ -----~ -- ---- • - >;;',y • ,•,.;~. . • :~~=:_r~ : ~r ~ ~,;: ~ :4.1 T 4 j ~ ,.;yiilp~ i~ , *~ y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,l. :: ., ,~ ,, NOW, THERE FORE, BE 1'l .ESOLVGp thet the Anahelm City Planni~.tl Commiesion dor.s hereby tecommand to the City Council of tho City ot .4naheim that eubject Petltlon for Reclaealticetlon be approved and, by so doing, that Tlt!e 18•Zoning of the Aneheim Munlclpel Code be emended ta exclude the above aescrlbed property lrom the R-A, Agt•icultural, Zone, and to incorporate sai.d described property ~nta the C-1., General Commei•cial, 'Lane, upon the Fnllowing condi~ions whtch ~re hereby fow~d to be a necessary pr~requisite to the proposed use of sub,~oct property in order to presexve t.he satety and general welfare of the citizens of the City uf Anaheirn: .1~. That ~treet improvemenL p'lans ,hall b~ prep~.red ~~nd all c:~nyinc~e~xing requirernents of' the City of Anaheim along l3each Boulevardy ~uch as curhs ;.,nd y~.ilt:er:;y ,idew~~lk,, sLi'NCt grading and paving, dxainaye facilil:ies, or ot,he; appurtenant work st~al.t be cornplered as required t~y the City Engineer and in accordance with standa7~d plans and ~~peclfications on fi.le in i.he ofFice of the City ~ngineer; and th~~t a bond in ari amount and form s~~Lisfnr,tory t.u the City of' Anaheim shal.l bo posted with the City t.o quarantee the install~.~tlon af said engineering t•equlrc~nients. 2o That the owners of sub,)ecL properly sh~11 pay t:o thc Ct~.y of An~heim khe sum of $2~00 per front foot along Beach E3uul.eva.rd, for st.reet llghtiny purposes., 3. That the ownexs of ~ubjecl, property shail o~~y Lo Lhe C1ty o1' Anuheim the surn of' 15Q per ~ront foot alung D~ach Houlevard, f'or tree plantlnc~ pu~~pose;,~, 4a That Condition No;;. 1y 2 and '3,, above n~~ani.loneci, shal ] be cornp,l ied wit.h within a period oF 1N0 days from d~~te hereof, ur such further ~ime as the t~ity Counci] m~3y g:r~~nt. 5~ That any ~ir condittoning facilities pro~.~osed shalt l~e pro~.~erly :~ni~i~if~~i from virw from abuttinq street,s, TH~: FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sIgned end approved by me this 1t d;3y of qpr i 1~ 1966 •, ~ i / CH RMAN ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: i ~~ /- ~j' + I ~22•2'(_.,;' ~C~G~i ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~ I i COUNTY CF ORANGE )~s, ! CIfY OF ANAHEIM ) - I ` I 9 Ann Krebs y Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of l~noheim, do heceby certify thet the fore- goinq cesolution wes pessed and edopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on !.~ ~ March 2~i, 19669 et 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof: P ' I; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer., Herbst, M~~ngall, Perx•y, Rowland~ ~ - f NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.. i - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~'t`1 TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto sat my hend this ~th da nF A _ y ~rily 1966~ :` ~ ~ w~ / ' L,/L?/~~ ; . ' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIvG COMMISSION • ;i * i RESOLUTION N0. 1991 - i 'A't~ ( - ~ R2-A ; -2- ~ 1 C ~w... r---_ _____,,~~,~.~.W ,;,,~-- ~ _ , --~~- . , . - - . ~:~ . . ,~.,.a.: ar~, ~ ~~- 6-'" '1 , ~i~"~~, ~ ';,_:Li : ~ ~~