PC 1965-1966-1997RESOLUTION N0, 1y91+ S~'l~ie~ 1965-•6G
A R~SQLUTION QF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'f11E CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1%'79 ~~~ pEN1ED
WHEREAS, the City Plnnning Commiesion of the City ot Analietm did receive o verifled Yetitlon for VnrlAnce from
LEDG~R 1'~ SMITH, 151 Miramont Drive, fiullerton, Californ ia, Owner; 7'. J. h10HIARTY, Box ~109U,
Anaheim, C~~lifornia, Agent af cE~rtain re;.~l proE~ez~Ly situaleci in Lhe Ci~y oC Anat~~eim, County
of Orange, State of Calif'nrnta, as de,cribc~d ir, ExI~1Gi+ "A° ~ilL~~r,hed h~~reto and referred Lo
~ her.ein as thouyh ~et forth in full
,._ .~+.°~
\ ~
; end
~ WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a pubtic hearing at the City Hell in the City o( Anaheim on
. April ~l l, ]9GG, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., noticF oE seid public heazing having been duly given es required by
lew and in ecrnrdence with the provisions of the Aneheim Munlclpel Code, Chopter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
' ond agi~inat sald proposed verience and to investigete rnd mAke findings and recommend~tions in cunnectlon therewith;
i and
' SVHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself nnd in its behelf,
and eEter due consideretion of ell evidence end reports offered ,it said hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitionet cequests e veriance Erom the Aneheim Municipal Code: to perrni t:
a. Erecti~n of an additional fre~~•standing siyn.
(Section 11i~62.090(B-1) - 1 perrnitt.ed -• ~` pro~.~osed}
' b. Location of s ign ad,jacent to wes ~ prepert.y 1 in e, ~
(Section 1~.62.090(5) - free-standinq signs not ~er-~,itted adjacent to ~ny side
~ property line.
2. ThaC the sign ordinance permi~s erection of a Free-•standing sign a~proximately forty
(40) feet in height and 300 square feet in area, which i~• comp~rable in area ta ,;at. beiny
_ requested, and said sign could he locate;i at the sile of the existina Iree-standin~ -'a;~;
therefore, the petit;ioner has not UT@~,E?r~l~~ E.~~,~jer~ce that a hardship exi~ '
3. That even upon the completion of thF unrir-rF'ast; of t.~e railroa~i, lhe•~ si~an
. will provide adequate signing for ~ubj~;.± proper',y,
~1• That there are no exceptiona; or , r'.IJOZ'C~11 JI ~~,~cumslanc~s r conditi~ns ~~,Nlicable
to the property involved or to the intendeci i.se of t:t~e pr op~~rty t haf r.~ ,~ot apE~iy genex il ly
to the property or class of use in the same ~i,~~'tr,_ t.y ,,~„~ ._one:.
- 5. 7'hat the requested variance 1~• nct nec.~~ssary r ~t~r~ ~res~~rvation and enjoyr^ent of
- ~enie~)ta,~,tial property riyht possessed by other pzo~erty in t.he s~~~~e vicinity and zone, and
the property in question~
' 6. That no one ;,ppeared in opposition to subject ~eL iLinn.
. ~ ~
; I
! ~
~
' ;
; ~
~
~
i ~
I
~ V1-D
~ -1-
I
'~ 1
~
~
~ R~.." "~ ~"'-^„-- t . :..~'";":..._=-•_ ....-•='-_ = =:.~:.~~;,,,"•"~,.~...~_......
. ~" ~ T' - - .»., .
~ ~~'? - , ~ . , .., , • ji~M.` ~ .~ i,..
J
4
' 'r-, .~,; ~ N~ i I . . .i .t~.~ , ~ ~~ 5 ~
, -- S , x t.~s , v '
, x E.
_.. . ,. _ .; ... . . ,. _ . .. . . .. .' . . . . ; _.. ~., . ~. ,. . . '
~,,,,, .., ..~ ,. ,
<,.„, ,,, ,,~~ ., ~ . , .,.,,, ,,..,,
~ .~„ ,, ,,....,.,
. . . , , ~°._.___...___ : __,_._.._1 ____---
;
, : ~.. _..'. .. I ; ~;,, 1\,,, ~ '. ' : ' , , ,,, ,I
, , , .
. . . . _ . . ~__ M,._ _„
, . 1'„~,..\, . . ~.. ... .. . ~ .. ~,
-- ,,., . „ ., , ;, ,. , , ,,, „~ ,,, ,,,,, ,,, , , ,,,, , , , ; ,. , . ,,,, . ., . ,. ,~.,.. , , ,., , . „~... . ..~~~; ~•
n,,.,, „~~ , ~,,. .,.. ,,..~. ~,.~;. , , ,,~ .: .... . . . : ... ... . „ . , .., ,. ,. ,~~ .,~ . ~ .~ . „~ ,. ,.,. .i; ,.~,~,
,. . ,, .~, , ,,,, „ ~•. „ , ,,,,i. ti,;,~ ,,,~; ,,.~ ~, ,.,,,.: , . „ ,,, , ~ , ~
„ , ,,,, , ,,,, ,,, , ,,,. ~• .~~ i~,.~~:
!i, r~ .,,,~ .,:~r ~ ,~,,,,~~ , ~ ._ , .. „~ ,~~ ~. ~. .
. . ,~. .,i li,i'~U u~ ~ ,~r,~ ~ ,,, ~. .
i~...~ ~1 ..., ~ . . . ~ - _ . . ~., ~ ..~ir ,..~~.t. , ~ 1 . ~ ~~ ~ ,
~~.~~~. - . .~ .. ..~. ._ ... .. _..._... .,~~rl),.~~~.
..~ ~ .. ... ~ ~. / .. ~ J . .. , ~ . .. . . ~. ~. . ., . . ~ ~
~:Xl'C~lil0lib:
~ I l . . ~t T ~ ~-,; .. ' • ,, _
;,.~ ~; ~ . Y / /~`~ ~J
...~„~~v~~~
•..!~, ^`{~
'/~1 ... ~'ti. ~
/ ~ ^~ .
. Irl:. ~ ~....,. ~.
~l.:l.~:l`:.:~_) ,,
,\~= ~~ ~1.`.~'iU~~\ ./ /'
~'/
• 1. l. V. l. V~
.~
~ +i~ ~i
i
,~
~ t
~
~i
I i
!
~ li
~I
I.
-I
~
ti` !
,
'!
_;
;• f ,
~ ~~
,.. I ~.+tY~ ~
~ ~
~:
r I
~
,
-;~' 1,;~
;~ ~
-.;:i .
NOW, THEREFORE, F3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Ptenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Veriance on the besis of the aforementloned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOL'UTION is signed end approved by me this 21 ~ t day of Apri 1 y 19G6~
~
ATTEST:
,
/~~` J L,._=7(-.Z., /~/
' ~~ C
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAIVNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann,~~g~s~~ Secretary oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thnt the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meetin~ of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
April 11, 1966, at 2:OC o'clock p,M,~ by the following vote o( the members thereof:
.~
~ ~ C_-~l~_C...`_:- .
/ ~.<< ,~_- `._.---
f CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbsty hlungally Perry~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of Aprily 1966~
r-` """ ~-~'"7"~ ~ ~ aL,~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1997
V2-D
-2-
.
~
ti
~