PC 1965-1966-2002RESOLUTiI~N NO
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiselon of the City of Anahaim did receive a vecificd Petitlon tor V~rience
from IMPERlAL QP.NK, Box 47~75, Lo~~ Anyele., Ca11fa1•nia, Owr~er; JAMf~S Kw ~CHU1.f'H, y.~n ~;~~~~
Katella, Anaheim, CaliFornia, Agent of cert,aln real ~;roperty sil,u~~ted in t,he City n; An~tirlrn,
County of Oi•ange, State of Califai•nia, descrt~ed a, Lol No. 1 of~ Tracl No. 309~;
A RESOLUTION 0~ 1'FiE CITY PLANNING COMMISS~ION OF THE CI'fY OF ANA}iGIM
THAT PETITION FpR VARiANCE N0, 1~} `~ _ E3E GRANTED
.. .~,,
;~
~ ; ~
; -
.;
~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiasion dld hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City ot Aneheim
on Apr i 1 11, 1966, at 2:00 o'ciock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es required
by lew And in eccordance wlth the provlsion~ of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider
evidence for and against said propoaed veriance end to investigete and meke (lndings ~and recommendntions in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commiseion, ofter due inspection, invesrigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
end after due conaideretion of ell evldence end reports offered U~ said hearing, does find and detetmine the following
fects:
1. That the petitioner reque,^.ta e varlence from the Aneheim Municipal Code: ~ ec t, i on 1~ ~.~}~ ,. C50( 5-k, ) wh i c h
requires that the maximum building height of a R-3 structure ;hall be onr stnry within 150
feet of a single family residenti:l zone t.o construcr. ;, two-stoi•y apartment ti>uildir.g on sul,ject.
property.
2. That there are exceptional or extreordinary circumstences or conditions applicabie to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not epply generelly to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity
end zone.
3. That the requested veriance is necessary fot the preservetion and enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the same viclnity and zone, and denied to the ptoperty in question.
4. That the requested variance wiil not be materielly detrimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone in which the property is located.
5. That the lots on either s~ide of suF; ject property are developecl v~itl~ t.wo-;t;ory
structures.
6. That no one appeared in oppositipn to subject ~~etit.ion~
1 ~ V1-G
,
'~ ; ~
~
*
! ~.
_ i
1
<i
~. ~ .
?0~2, Ser 3 es 19(~r~~-6G
-1-
. ~~±.ti:
,4~
i~
~
NOW, THER~FORG, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Pl~nning Commieaion does h~:reby ~rant PubJect
Petition for Varience, upun the followinq condltiane which ece hereby Eound to be a necee~aery prerequiolte to tho pro-
poeud uae ot the subJect property in order to praserve thr seEety nnd genarel welfere of the Citlzens of the Clty of
Anahelm,
1. That subject proporty shall be developc~d subst.ant.lally ln accordance with plans
and spectfic~~~iuns on file wlth the City oC Anaheim, rnat•ked Exhibit No~. l through 5..
.~, :.i~
~t
,;;~ s ~
j
~
;
i
;
-
~
i
~
,,
,
. ,1
ti
~
~
~
i
i
;
. i
;
,
~ ~
,~j
! -
I
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ond approved by me thi 21 s 1; ~1 a y oC Apr i 1, 1966 „
~ ,
._ ~T6.' ~~.~_.~' ~/~~
-/
CHAIRMAN ANAfiEIM CITY PLAI~NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/ % , '~ /
/~-~L2~-7 - ~2,C~C,4-~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I+ ~f~~~~~+~'~~s~, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wag passed and edopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of F~neheim, held un
Apri 1 11 ~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
A~'ES: COMMISSIONEI2S: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 21st day of April, 19660
I
~
`.. ~~ ~~
.:;.i
', `1 , ~
;1`• ` i ~
f : ,; .~~ ~
~~ ~
' ~l
~
~,:~~t~~
~~~, Z ~
.1a:::
r ,.u..
~/' ~- ' ~
-~---? "-~- c . ~ ~ /c., ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTI0~1 N0. ~002
V2-G
-2-
~
L
r.