PC 1965-1966-2069RESOI..UTION Nn,_._~)~>`i, S~~ri~~~. 1')%"` -~':,(; ~
i , ..;~ti1i ,,
\ 1ti t
4
i
i
'1
A I2tiSQl,UTION Ob' THE CITY F~I.ANNING CUMMIS510N Qt~ THF: CI'CY OF ANAliI:IM
R[:COMMENDING 'CO TFIG CITY CUUNCiL OF TfII: C1TY O(~ ANAHT:IM 7'HAT
PF.TI'C10N FOR Rt;CLAFSiFICA7'10N NO,,~;,);:(';v':'t)_---__ I3F, DF;N1f:U
WI-1[:t~L:AS, the City 1'Innnina Commiasi<>n of the CitY of Aneheim did receive ta verified Yetition far Reclns5i(ica-
~lUll f~O1T1 V~~~ A~. ~171.1.;.,, (!i ~]~y ~~~~.,1,,~~ ~~i,ll:;~l~~_ ~'ti~l~/~ G_~T'.~i_fl ~JIOV~1y :;~_illl~').l'fll:l~ ~~~yn~~7~S. ~~'f i:k"!:~f.'llfl T~E1~il
~~I~C)F)QI'1 ~/ :i 1 ~I1;l~.QC~ Ifi ~:f1C Ll ~:~! Of~ .~fl~l~1C~1(li~ ~iOUll~ty :Jf ~T=111~1~'y •~]~,~t~.~' ~)f ~~;'i~ l~ ~~1~:'11 ~:~~ jl'• , ~C ll~i~~.~l ,1~~
~ .' ~
,~~t_ ~`~U~. v ~~~'~ `~v ~illt~ 9~~ U~ ~T(~Ul'( ~~p,~ '.f~ 3j ~']:• r1~,~V~fl O11 ;i ~~II~~ T'C'('.r~Zi1l.'(3 il' f5 ~
~_ •;',~ (',~ i~.': 1
~u !`~ <~f' hlisrEll,'~neous N1a~,s, f~er~~~r~is ~~C Or,~nq~~ Coun~tY, C~~l~it ~, nir~.
i.Ji!~'1 ` :
,
~ „ ~-'~I~~.iYf",~ '~(li, `,.i
'I ., I nr',~~~ t ~~ . ?Ut~
L, Je l tr~, ';00 iJ,
E. .?~ Sm:t.fi, 69~
Uhir> ;t~ An~:~f~~:u,~
,~t.,~t e Cc}~ le~e Ilivcl, y Ar~afiei~
S t,., r~, C~_~? lent~ 31vd. , Anahei,~;
Orann.et.horpe Ave~, 5uenc Park
; and
IYHEREAS, the City Planning Commi~sion did hola e public hearing et the City Hc~ll in the City o( pnaheim on
J'~~~e 6, ? 966, nt 2;00 o'clock P.M,, notice of sald public hearing hnving been duly given as required
by lew and in accord~nce with the provisions of the Anc+heim A4unicipal Code, Ch~pter 18,72, to hear and consider evi-
denc~ for end ageinst s~id pmposed reclassifi~ation and to investigete ~nd make findin~s nnd recommendntions in
connection therewith; end
W}iF.REAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, ~nd study mede by itselt and in its behalf,
nnd after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered ~t said he~iring, does [ind c~nd determine the Eollowing
facts;
1. Thnt the petitioner proposes e recln5sificntiou of the above described property from the C- ;., Ge~~tr:;:
COI!11?~BI'C13~. ZUf;F dee~.3 :BS!1':Ct@~ i0 C~USlil@s5 &f1~7 T0~@SSI:,n:.~l ~~;'~ ~ • •.
~ ~ . i_B I:SPS ~,i',~y , ~ ~~I~B C-:p
Gener~,l Ccr~~r,erci~~l~ Zone ~nresti•;cteci„
2. Tiiat t.}-ie pr~uosecl cieietion cr cieeci res~.rictions or. subiec? c~i;,., ,
' r e1•ty :s not ne~~~ss~:r~•
rifltl OT ~I@S1I'clt~]2 t~OT~ f.he OTU@T'i~~ c~~'~ FJT•0~)E'I' ~eV~'10~T~Bn} ~,lc !.ItE' CO . Uflli~~,.
~+.~ Tf;cit Il!1 @COf1G:Lli' OZ' :J(li~ L{SP ~ti1c~CCjn !~~35 i,~i~@fl ~11)l'? ~iI'~CF7 ~}:P 1' i' ' ~,
- r j';r ;r1~3, it'c l
Ze5`.2'i:~f 10(1S were appl ieo, t0 WBT;~iClt tf1Q CO!",i';1S510t~ ~'OI1S ll'~C'2'1~c7 Z'@:"pV~l; ,~!~ 55;;1 ~iee~:
restrict:ons.
<.,, Z'};8~. {;(1 TE,'210•~~t: t,'IE? B:it,8t7~7.~f.2C1 (.~QBU TE'S~T::~+:C'RS WOUtCj Ut' C~T'a'l::f'.C~ ''~le I't'!'.8;~'Ii1lQ
pi~~.~pert.y ewners~ wh~~ have no± ~eveicped their r:•o~~erty. a G>rivi?ege not en;;oyed b•, ~roper~t~~
;i~,vners •,v};o i;a~, e,,o~,;~ ~ ie~i ;vith t i;e deed z~es f r; c t; or,s ~
:-„ Ti~::t tl~e proposed ;1?:eti~~n cf deed restrictions c;uld 'nave a;ie:eter;,,us e: fec o;,
f.flE' g'fl~~if? ~~~3f;i~!1~/ flOII~BS lf`;~I;U(j1atP1}~ tp t.Il@ E'dS~: QF gU~C~~PC~ Li2`^pPTt~,.
f„ ~r~i2t ~WO persons apE~earedY r~fl@ Ot~ 'N}';0';~ repres~nf:eci ;iflOt(7@:. :~I'0F)E'7'_}' OYJ'1P.' ^f~
;~rcpert:es ~vi~i~h r~ave deed .res',ictions~ ar,~~i ore let,eT• w~s ~ece~~:~eci i~ ~,;,~.,si~`„~ !_o !i~e
reqiies! tor ci~let.i~~n of deed r~s!rict:r.ns~ ~
R1-D
-1-
~
i#
NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Maheim City Plnnning Commieslon doce hereb,y recommend
to thc Clty Councll ot the City o[ Anaheim thet eubjoct Petitlon for ReclesaifIcation be denied on the basis of the
eforementioned !indings.
T~;E FOREGOMG RESULUTION ls signed and approved by me thls l.t~tl" ~iay ~.,f Jun~, ]~it:,(,,
, ~..
:' /~ ~',
~ ~ c~~ ' :. '-. ~i..
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTES'f:
~' / . ~
~ ~- . . , , ) ~
SECRETARY AIVAHE[M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHGIM )
I, Ann f~t ebs, Seccetary of the City Planning Commissian of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the face-
going tesolution was passed and adoFted at a meeting of the City I~lanning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
.June i,, i 7i~i~, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Cam~, Gauer, Herbst, IJ~unaall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: N~~ne,
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of Ji~ne, 1°G6.
~'~ -
_ ~ . . , ~ `~ ~ , ~ ~
RESOLUTIOh N0. 10n9
R2-D
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2.
..-4''•,R'~ . _. . ,~ ~--.:- -~•-. - . - - - •r+..~e~r..
. .. , - ,•.r~'"..' ,~;1:~~+y~p .
~ , .
„