PC 1965-1966-2072Rl;SOI~UTION N0,
: 0~2, S ~r i os 1 ~G`:~-(~G
A RF~ULUTION QF TF1E C17'Y P[.ANNING COMMISSION 0~ Tfil's C('I'Y OF ANAIIEIM
RECOMMENQtNG TO THE C1TY CAUNriL OF TH~ CI'TY OF ANAFIEIM THAT
PrTITIQN FdR RL'CLASSIFI~.ATION NO. ~'F'`~'~'' 1~`~ F3E DCNIED ~
,.
i _~r,. .
~
;~ f
,
1
WFIFhCAS, the City Plenning Commission oF the Clty of Annhelm did receive e verified Petitlon !ar RvclASaifice-
tionfrom HENRY WAGNER, 97~, S, State Colleqe Boulevard, Anahelm, California, Owner; WEGER
CX1h1~ANY, INC~, ~;~i'19 W. Pico E~lvd., Los An~~e.les, California, Agent ~f cert:ain r~al E~roper±y
situated in the City of Anaf;eiri, County of Orange. Stat~ ~f California. ~s ~iesrribed in
Exhibit. "A" attachec; lierc.~to and .referred to herein as thounf~ s~~t. fort,l~ ~n ;ull
; end
WfIERFAS, thc Cit; Planning Commission did hold ~ public hearing nt the City Hall in the City oE pneheim on
June 6, 1966~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oi seid public hearing hAVinq been duly given ns required
by Inw and in accordence with the provi5lons of the Anaheim htunicipal Code, Chnpter 18.72, to heer ~nd consider evi-
dence for nnd ~gafnst snid proposed reclassific~tion end to investigete and mnke tindings end recommendetions in
connection therewith: nnd
WHERE.AS, sFlid Commission, nfter due inspection, investigntion, nnd study m~de by itself ~nd in its behalt,
and efte~ due consideretion of ell evidence and reports offered at sHid hearing, does find nnd determine the folluwing
facts:
1. Thet the peNtioner proposes e reclessification of the above described property from the R~ A9 Aqri~.'ultural,
Zone to the C-1, General Commercial, Zone or~ Portion No< 1 to establ~sh a~ervice station.
take-out restaurant and ret~il stores; and t.o the G2, General C:o,rur;ercial, Zone on P~rtion
No. `.~ to establish a restaurant and cocktail lounge.
; 2o That so~r~e o; tF~e proposed uses for subject property are per~• iss:ble in lhe A~;-1 Zc~ne
by Cc,nditional Use Per~;;it, and since the adopted General PI~n indicates industrial develop-
_ rnent in this general area, the E~etitioner could develop the property without th~ encroach•~,ent
of rorn;ner~~ial uses into an area already establisf~ed and ~eing de~~eloped for. industi•ial purF~ose~.
:~~ That the approval of the establishment of comn;erci~l use; int~ the ~rea would encourac~e
a pattern af' strip ~~ornmerr_ial. development along the Ball Road and State Colleoe $oulevard
Frontage of the remaininc~ undeveloped property~
4, Tnat the rommercial uses already established at ihe northeast c,orner -~ :tate
Col.lege Boulevard and Ball Road are considered adequate to serve i!~e commeTri..l ;~eeds or'
the residents in the area, in view of the fact that rnucn of the trade _3rea }~as ~een zoned
or is generally planned foi indtlstrial use.
5. That the p:oposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary ~nd,or
desirable for the orderly and p.roper developrT;ent of ihe community.
~' 6. That the development of this parcel in the mUnner proposea v~ould prec~.lude the
~" proper development of the rest oF the undeveloped propertyo
+ 7. That one person appearea representing the industrial developrnent .at.ely adjacent
~ to subject prop?z•ty in opposition to subject petition~
R1-D _1.
~
~
d
I
1
i
NOW, Tf~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Pinnning CommiSSlon does hereby recommend
to the City Council oE ihe City of Anaheim that subject Petitlon for FeclassiEicetion be denied oa the baRis of the
aEorementloned flndings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION Is slgned and approved by me thls lfit.' ci~;y nf June, 19~~C
ATTEST:
C~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ •
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING (:OMMISSION
STATE QF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, f;n~ fCrebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting oE the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, held on
June ~,, 1~)6G, at 2;00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereoE:
AYES: COMMIS5IONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Herbst, h",ungall. Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
,, ,.= /• .
; ~
,~ ( /
- r~. :~L.~ ~ !C r
CI~AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N~ne.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 16th day of J~.ne, 1966.
r'
r . ` j '~ C': .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COPAMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 20~2
R2-D
~
, ,
A
:;~' i
;~::`,. i „+t~
t;- i
;, i
~
;~-
,~:' ;>~~
-`'~.:i :
" u.
-2-
,.
~
~
~
~
I~