PC 66-140. i
~ PC66-140
RESOLUTION N0.
, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANC.E NO. 1~3R BE GRANTED IN PART ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petitfon for Variance
from SOUTHLAND MACHINEP.Y GORPORATION, 1R22 South Lewis Street, Anaheim, California, O~rmers;
ALFRF~ J. GILES, 1R22 5outh Lewis Street, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot 3 of
_ Tract 50R4
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Commission did hold a public heari~g at the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim
on November 7~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required
by law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for end ageinst seid proposed veriance end to investigete and make findings end recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
I WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
end aEter due consideretion of ell evidence and reports offered at seid heering, does find end detecmine the following
fects:
i ;,
,,~ I
~
I '
~ :
~
.f~
~;_
~.
.i~
i fi ;
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience from the Anaheim Municipel Code: Section 1R.52.060(3-b) ~xhich
requiras that'a 6-;ooi masonry wall enclesing the outdoor stora9e of equipment to permit
construction of a b-Foot chain link fence, around a portion of the oeriphery of subject property.
2. That there ere exceptionel or extraordinary circumstences or condit:ons npplicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply generelly to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested varience is necessery for the preservetion and enjoyment of e substential property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the :equested veriance will not be meterially de!rimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements 9n such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That waiver of the required 6-root masonry wall along the northerly coundary of
subject p~operty for tt~e westerly 209.a3 feet is hezeby granied, ir ord?r to permit a
reasonable amount of ouLdoor display.
6. That no one appeared in opposition and that 3 letters were received from adjacent
property osvners expressir,g no opposition to the proposed ct~ain link fer,ce.
Vl-G _1_
°. ~
5
r,
~ ;
in~par;.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thni tSe Anaheim Cit3• Plar.rcis~ L'omcriss:oa du~s eer~~v ¢rant~;.uir;,ect
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby Eot~n~ 4e, l+e u n_t:essaty Prereryaisife ta thc: ~n~•
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety and generul w~itN,.e ~i the Citiz~ns ~[ the (,lY~~ eS
Anaheim.
la That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance~r~ith plans
ar.d specifications on fi12 with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 19 2, and ~.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 17th day of November, 1966.
` ~ ~ /
C IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM SSION
ATTEST:
l~l~t/ j~ y~2.~U-p~
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIyG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGF. 1 ss.
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, dol~ereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adopted nt e meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
November 7, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NVES: COMMISSIONERS: R~ne.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E':'_: ed.
IN WITNESS l4HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this i7th day of NovemUer, 1966.
~~ ~~~~
L ~L /
SECRETARY ANA~iEIM CITY PLANNING COMMJSSION
RESOLUTION N0. 140
V2-G
-2-
~