PC 66-145RESOLUTION NO
PC66-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMhiI:'SION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}iE CiTY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-6?-37 gg GRAf:TED
~ -~-~'!~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, ?~-+ East Lincoln A~ier.ue, Anaheim,
Cali:ornia did ini?iate a verif'ied petition for reclassif:ca;ion oi certain ~eal property
situated in the City of ,naheim, ~ounty ef Orange, Sta.e of C31i:oxnia, described in Exhibit
"A" at.tache.i nereto and reierred t~ herein as tnougn set fortr. in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hell in the City of pnaheim on
i~ovember 7, 1966 at 2:00 o'clock P.hi., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as recjuired
by lew end in eccordence with the provlsions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72,to hear end consider evi-
dence for and egeinst said proposed reclessi:ication and to investigete and make findings and recommendetions in
~ronnection therewith: end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aher due inspection, investigation, end study made by itselt and in its behel(,
aid after due consideration oE all evidence end reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the [ollowing
facts:
1.Thetthe Co~r.~is;inn cccpos~~; ., :r.las;.~i::at:or. o: _i;? abe;~e yesc:.ce: F.;ope:", r:er.
tf~e R-3, Multiple Famiiy Residen:ial. Zone to the R-A, P.q:icui.ural, Zone.
2. Tti~t Gene:al Pian Air.endinent :~o, b•,va= considered previcusly on subje ~.~r,d ab:tt:ng
propertie~.
3. That the cro~osed :eciassifieatier of sub;ect proper:';' :s rr.:c•.c..,:, ,, ,.._ ::atle
`c: ... r or:ler;y an~ ~rcpe: .,op..._ r_. t'~e comTUri`y.
4. T;:at the proposed reclassit :cat.ior oi subject pronerty does :.:ooe::~ :el~:e ~, _,..
zones and '_heir permitted uses local:y establisi.ed in close pro~..imit~, to sub;~~~_~ .;cpercy ar.d
~ tne zones acd t:ieir pe:^iitt~d us~_ qenerally established ti,rouy^out ti,e corc,:r,..r _ty.
5. That L}:e owners o: suc '.~c~ :~roperty have indicateo t~iey no ionge:~ in?.eno ?c ir•~-rl:,
subject property ~3s or.einali~; ,nE~:ovc~d, ~nd re?uest tha~ t~.r r:operty be : ezone: '., its
criginal status, in ordar !hat s~~u:ities posteo with '.:i,e C:,.y of Ananeim ;a,ni.t be :e:c~ase:i.
b. That the Comn.ission recommenjs that no abandonmer.t snei; be made alonq Cre~ ent
Avenue or Gilbert Street., eve^ tho~qh :ied:caticr. `ias been r.~ade to tf~.ese ~re~~ts' ult'.;ne?e
wi-.ith.
~. That ±he Commission :ecommerds that al: securit.ies p ste~ x:th. t.i,e C:~y ~t F.nai.:-;r
be :ele~~,ed upon the fir,ali~.inr, o° th~ proposed abar.donrnent o: inn~~d,:ir AvN~iu:• :,.,. Cain'o::~
St.reet.
~. Ti~at no une aE,~ea: e7 in oppos:' ion to s~.~'t jecc pet i t icn.
Rl• -1-
~: _
tl ~
{~ ~
~
~-
,,::,,
_ _ _ ..
~~I-.
~ .
~. ~
i }
;i ' ~~.
_ _ .___1_
~ _ .... . _ ~/
. ~
, ...:~::.__ _1~::.~.:':~. __... _"v.~ .....~L.^.::v... _..r~.l_~i.. ..V. ...'..i~.i. __ ........__.. .._ ..
I
I y~.-~~'L .. ...~_ .:Oi',`.1i . :~C C: iil•~ .::~Y',`,::i9E.Si; C;V.3Y'~.:iY 0: 'C}ir3 ::~::U'i~,.~1G ~ ' }
^C:..~ ~1+.~ .,' S~ ~~U6Ti:C:: UI
I `, ...- , ~ _'~,..,;:511ip •. .i0'.1'~::..o ;~~~qc? ~Q ;;Pc:'C :.~a ~~ ~ ~ r~;: EL .
~I:C :~f:Ci1f.; Li:., i.u)' i~1Sy S~pY,.^. G.^.
;;~ ::c~ :~:. :;ccl: f ?~' `: ranc C i
~.5~~`!:C.....c.. `~'r~'~c LU G iSC~ .:i?CUS ..ap5y .~Cv"::15 G. (i' v' U~.^.'C~>
~
i l~ci ..,.,.QG;:. ~.i'v.:i',:_OC: ~~:c° '~.)0*_'7.tG;? i. ^,O `~GL":i'1°__'~ 0~: 1': -,1 ' ~
G^..:~.,..G'i.':`.C _,..... ,- ~ .. ~ ~ ~r•ri r^ ~iC ,DE;'_3llt i:^C .
..:;li G:. ..'.':~~ d~0:~..?1'i; ...~~lJ _.~ 7. ~.. ~il£• :r11Q:•;;"~J CnSC~rli;3:i i:.C'..
..fi~~ ..... ~: ' D : ,":'C ' _H(:~ _. '^~V i~• U:^.. i~ +-~ . ~ • . .
S::`_~ :~O;s;. 'iBSL C~l:c'.L~F?Tp 58:.G U::1~
.C ~' :. L'c., ~~::r. I~' G^•~~l l ".J .J_c 5., .~-~1• ..~". CI:C l.. ~'t ~}!C .'.J'l'~)'.~'F.S L CG'~I":i?. Oi S~_v
.~~ .i`:. S~ C;:::.=~.. , ~i1QJC^ ::OIiT.}'1 c.,`.~~ GC~uli'~ .it$i. iG~..:i~. i~.?ii'C i.C .~ii )?~~'...Il?iC G: ~ .
' "•` a "'~e c:~::c~vs, ' ;,,;iie_~y hav.nq •• ~ac:~s u: 1 ~GO.GC =~;'c;at',e~ice .~.es'•c-rl~
i u~'.• ....3~G=~V diU^C~ .. :C C'.:_`fC '~O ~. 7J1.^,1 '_il L.~G :iCS~ i:::r., pe '~RC' i~~G'l'L~:uuSi. ~.
C;~~,.__ C. 5:.:~Ci ..3U~.. ,,,,,,4C:.EY'L'_.,.
. ~u_Cnt _ :~.'. ..^~G:V_ cu ~...~j1:/~~' ...-. _ xt•: .~i '
~ ;.CS ~:.~}f~SL ~~i :~ GiJti;l ~~1.~i1i :8~.'~ 0: ~t18
~~Ol ~.: ~ .'~;.~G _ Q'C Qi~".'• ~.'.~~5'C ~~i~i`:' ..',:,G~.° '~~:1: L'~;5'Ly.`,yC :~8~: G` 'i.~.:2 :~(~l"i.~l~~fi°.i. .
~ C;U::_Y~3' p:° L~••~ ':Jt.i..c.~'C GL'a~`~.Q: 0: :.~C'C?O^~ ~~ 1Cl'i~'S}:_,O -. aO'~.li.i':~~iiEfl~~ IQ ~?~PSt
e
. . . ~... ,'~. ~.. .. .
~~{ \
1'.I
41
;~ ~
,~
~
''~ ~X
~: ~
-..__..~.__.~~:.._._............ ... ~...,..,
. ... , ._ . ...:.: -_ .,:._.
._' ".' ~ / . -.~
. _ .^.,1:J1~~ '
~
` - ' 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheirc City Plenning Commission does hereby recommend
• to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclessification be epproved end, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be emended to exolude the a6~cr•re described property from the
R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zoney and to incorporate said described qroperty into the
R-•A, Agricultural, Zone un~cndi±iona~iy_
w~•
~} j
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and rpproved by me this 17th day of November, 1456.
~ ~ /
~~ r
C~[AIRMAN ANAHEIRI CITY PLAN ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~"(/YLyL'" 7~,}i2.t~U-c=./
SECRETARY ANAHEIM1i CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretery of thr City Plenning Commisslon ot the City of Anoheim, do hereby ce~kify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning ~~ommission of the City oE Anuheim, held on
Plovember 7, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the memb~rs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this i7th day of November, 1966.
a-
. ~
'~ "~ RESOLUTION NO. :45
`.~ ;
I R2-A
C~.~- ~~-~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2. .9
~