PC 66-157'. RESOLUTION N0. P~O6-15"7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMINISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETlTION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1f342 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the Clty of Mehelm did receive e verifIed Petition for yariance from
PAUL VON ESS~lJ, j%23 West 75th Straet, Los Angeles, California, Owner; K. E. JOHNSON, 8151
Oranyethorpe Avenue, Bu2na Park9 Califo:nia, Agent o: certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, Cour.ty oi Orang?, 5tate of California, describ2d in Ex~ibit "P." attached
hereto and iefe'cred to h?rzin as ti~ough set forth in Full
~~ ~
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public heering at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
November 2i 9 1966Y at 2:OU o`clock P.M., notice of seid public headng heving been duly p~ven es required by
leav end in ecoordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municlpel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence tor
end egafnst said proposed verience end to investigate and meke Eindings end recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its behalf,
end efter due rnnsideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid heering, does find and detertnine the following
[ects:
1. That the petitioner requests e veriance from the Aneheim Municipal Code: to e•stabl isti a smal l mai~eet
on sub.j?ct property:
SECTION 1R,:10_C7G 3-a - Maxi~m~m buildina r.eiyt;t in relati.on to setbacF: (14-foot.
building height proposed; 2R-foot setback required -
°-r'oot setbar,k on i.he ~~:est and ]2-:oot setback on the
soutt~ proposad)~
SECTION 1£3.,40.070~`Z_F)_- Pa:kir.y (12 spacas required; lu spar.es proF;osed).
~. Tt,at thare are no e;cceptionel or extraorainary circumstdnces or cor.ditions
applica~le ?o ti;e propert/ invol~~ed or to the inter,ded use o: the property ti~at do no;
apply ganerally lo tiie p:operty or r..lass of use in tiie same vicinity an:i zone.
3. That {i~e requested vaiian.e is no±. necessaT•y for ;.I,e praserv;tion and enjo~ment of a
subsiantial prop?rty riyht posses.~d 'ny other property ir, tne same vicinit.y and zone, and
denied t;o the property in question.
4. Tiiat tiie reyuestecr var'rence ~r.~ill be mataria:ly detrimental t.o t!,~ p~,~blic :,;elf3z•e
or injuz'tous to the propert~~ or impro:~emzats ir, euch vicin:t:y and zori~ in nrhicl~~ t.i~e prope: t.y
is located.
5. T~~at ttia~o persons appearei, rep:esenting 1''~ pe:sons present in tne Coun;.ii Cnamber,
ir, oppositionc and a petition signed by 85 persons acd letters :rorn the Gity or Buena Park
and a c}:urch located in close proxirnity were received in opposit.ion. Two pei•sons apueax•e.-i,
and a petition signe~l by ,even persons was received in favor of subjeci, pet.ition.
I,
V 1-D
:~ - I :
~
~
i *
~~ ~
~~ 's
1-
J
~
b
3
. „
- i
~4
-~ ~ ..._ ------
--- __. ---,- ._.__ .
~ ~ . .. -_ _ .. --------_~ J.. \
i ~i '"~'• O Q •.
~ , -~ ,~,_.,_,~;~., ~~t;. •• . . .
'. '~ '~ ' V-~nrlcan Lcnd Tldn Aemdm(on Loon Policy .
~ ;,~~;~,~~o~ ~o:~,a.~,~;,: • S C H~ D U T. ~ C .
~ ~ ~ Cal:(cm:a lcnd i~tln Ai~oc~o~lon
~ I ~ Slcndard Cowra-,o ?oliry-7951 ~i. ~ ' - . . r '
; i . -~~...~.::_:.. ._. ^J ._ t .. ~ .,
;I ~~ Tho land referred to in tlus policy is described ns follows: . .
i
' i , ._.._..~...._ . _....._~__._....._...~_~._........._.- -......,....,..
i~
i~;e \'ortn 165.00 fcet of thc liast 1h2.00 fect of the northeast j
~ c{uar~cr of thc SOUi,I1WCSt quartcr of Section 12; in Townshin 4
Souti~, Ran~;c 11 1t'cst, in ~hc (tancho Los Coyotes, city of . j
Anahcim, county of Oran~;o, stato oF CaliLornia, as said south- ~
~•res;. c;uarter of said Saction 12 is 5~lOlJll on a map of survey
recorded in book 16, page 11, Record of Surveys, in tne of£ice
o~ ;,tie county recorder of~ said county. ~ ~ ~~ ~
±,.r'•?:~--=z1T-;.-~~ e ~' cr~r ~~ 9 6 = ee ` ~~~ , ~~''~`~~ ,
T:
~ J .r....-....~..........~.....~.. .. - - .........~+........~.r......,......... - .~.~.....,,~e..~,..,..,,.N~~.s,~...,.~ ~.
~r.,,~~~n."•,nl: ~~ll. ~~~~~~
1';~~ .i:.'.,.
:~ \
~,{ ~
~: *
; I~ VLY.
i
i. ;
i
i'.
. ~
~..~ _ .. -
_~._ _.,..,:... _..
. . . ~ , - :_ .
. ~ _. . .
._~ „ - ~.v~~ .i~r~y~:
~
~ ~~ ~
`~
;~
,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
~ Petition for Variance on the 6asis oE the aforementioned findings.
THE FOP.:iGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lst day of Decernbery 1906~
~ . / ~
CH IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM SSION
ATTEST:
~
_ ; :;
-. ; ~~2 _ J.~ ~' ~~ ~ //
r
SECRETARY ANAHEIhT CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOY
I STATE OF CALIFORt:TA )
;~ COUNTY OF ORAhGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
~ I9 Ann K~rebs9 :,e, Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby cedify that the fore-
~ going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
,''~ November 21~ 1960~ et 2:00 o'clock p.M„ by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred, Gaue., Herbst, M~,mgall, Rowland, Camp~
~; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
r •
~, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
I :
,,
`~ ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lst day o; Decembery 196F,~e
i:
I y C,'~ 1"Z t- c(~:~ .~
~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 1::7
V2-D _2.
~~ ` ~
!,• ~
~ ~
„~.-„~:,........~..~,~,.~,,,. , _,~._ ~ !
..,_, ., .. ..,,.~.~...,...~.,:..~ .............
., ..,..~. ....,.... .. _ _.;.,~ ,
.. . . i' _
~