PC 66-170RESOLUTION NO
PC66-170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ~40 BE GRANT~D
WHEREAS, the Clty Plannin6 Commission of the City of M~heim did receive e verified Petition for Conditionel
• UsePermitfrom ALPINE D~VELOPDAENT COMPAIJY, 1i221 East 17th St*eet, Suite H, Santa A;;a,
California, Owners of certain real property situateo in the Cit~~ of hn~i~eiru,County of Orarqe,
State of California, described as commencing at a point ?_19.25 f eet south of the Ptorti~vaest
corner of the South half of the Northwest quarter of tne Nortiiwest quarter or' Section ]:, s.n
~ Township 4, South, Range 10 West, San Bernaroino 6ase ano Alericiian, runnii:r, f.i~~=ncc Soutn ii?
:i ' feet; thence East 1320 feet to the East lina of ti~e IJorti:west quarter oc ti,a f;ortt;rves;. quar;er
`F of said Section 12; thence fQorth 117 feet; thence west 13~0 feet 'o tne po::,t of begin~;ir.a
~.
~
~
1
~ ; and
i WHEREAS, the City P1annlnQ Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anahcim on
December 19, 1906, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by
~ lew and in eccotdence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
I Eor and egeinst said proposed conditional uae rufd to i~veetigate end meke Eindings end recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHERERS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itsel( and in its behalf, and
eEter due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find end determine the Eollowing facts:
1. That tr~e petitioner proposes modification of uses permitted in City Cot;r.c,l R~=olu~ion
No. 6~R-6R9 dated July 24, ]962 to oermii on-sale liquor and ti:e installa~io~ o= a c<,r ~,;r,,;~:
authority of Code: Section 1R.64.G60(g) on subject property.
a
I 2. Thet the proposed use will not adversely effect the adjoining land uses end the growth and de.velopment of
~ ~ the area in which it is proposed to be loceted.
; 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequote to allow the full development of the
-~ ptoposed use in s menner not detrimentel to the particular area nor to the peace, health, sa(ety, and genernl welEere
- of the Citizens of the City of Maheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detcimentel
to the peace, health, safety, end general welEare of the Citizens of the City of Annheim.
5. Tnat the on-sale liquor ;:lities ~vould be incidentiai to t:},~ rastaurant operation.
6. That no one appeared in opposition. ;,nd a petition signed by ~0 ne~rby resic.ient=_
~ ti~as received in zavor of subject petition.
Cl-G
-1-
~
S:
e
/
;: NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED Hi~t che An~Mle C(t~• pl+r~in~ Canelpion does hereby gru~t subject
' PeHtlon for CondiUoe~l U~~ Phwit, uMe tla (ollowin` conditiou~ ~!!di rtt hsreby found to b~ a necesa~ry preepuiaite
to the propo~ed wt of the~so-JKt ~op~rty !n ord~r to preoerve QM~ ~~t~ty ~nd Qenenl welt~ra of the Citlzena of the
City ot An~helm:
` 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on f~le with the City of Anaheim, rnarked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
i
TH~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION is etpw! ~nd ~ppwved by ~e thi~ 29th day of December, 1966.
1
IItElAN ANAHEIM CITY PL NNING C MMISSION
~,.
'; ~ I
~~ ~
:f
,~ ~R
ATTEST:
-- ~/~~ ~ ~t/ ~%~~/
SECRETARY ANAHEiirl CITY PLANNll1G COMIASS70N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as,
CITY OF AIVAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Seaetary of the Clty'Plrala~ C.o~oiadon of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify th~t
the fore~oin~ rewlutlon was pue~d ~nd adaptsd at ~ mNtins o[ the City Planning Commiasioa of the City of Anahdm,
held on December 19, 1966, at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by the followin~ vote of the membera thereof:
AY~S: COA11tlSS(ONERS: Allred, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMAtISSIONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMN1SSi0NERS: Farano, Gauer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I h~ve her~unto s~t my h~nd Wis 29th day of December, 1966.
Lj~-~~L Y'~C ~~~Ci'
SDCRETAFc'Y ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING C01iMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 170
C2~G _ 2~
~
~