PC 66-174Sl
PC66-174
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF Tf~Fb CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 5BE DENIED
~" -•'~'~
~~~ ,
W13EREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receiv~. a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permitfrom EARL SPRATLEN, 461 West Valley View Drive, Fullerton, California, HECTOR PEi.AYO,
232 San Carlos Way, Placentia, California, Owners; WILLIAM TOPLIKAR, 3505 Mungall Drive,
Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,. County
of Orange, State of California, described as Lots 43 and 44, Tract 2022, as shown on a map
thereof recorded in book 58, pages 24 and 25, Miscellaneous Maps, recorcis of said Orange
County
; and
WHEF.EAS, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City oE Aneheim on
December 19, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es requiced by
lew end in eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for end egainst said propos..d rnnditional use and to investigate and make findings and recommendatlons in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
end efter due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end deteanine the following fects:
1. That the proposed use is p~opetly one for ahich e Conditionel Use Permit is euthorized by this Code, to wit:
Sectiors 1fl.40.0601c) and 1R.64,020(5) to establish a service station at the intersection of a
seco~dary and a local street, and within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waiver of:
SECTION 1F~.40.070(3-a) - Building height in relation to setback. (2:1 ratio of
setbach to building height would require a 30-foot setback
from 'he rear property line for the 15-foot high proposed
biiilding; no setback proposed).
tt '
~. ~
,f.l *
:-i ~
2. That the proposed use will adversely af:ect the adjoining residen:ial iand uses ano
the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow the
iull development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to
the peace, health, safety, and gener ' welfare of the ~itizens of the City o; Anaheim.
4. That the request for waiver of the r~__;uired building setback would have a deleterious
effect on the residents to the east since a 15-foot building located on the easterly property
line would depiive the adjace!~t resid?nts of th_ normal use of their rear yards and svaimmir~g
pools.
5. That th? dust, noise, bright lights, fumes, and hours of operation, inherent in this
type of use would effectively destroy the residential integrity of the area. .
6. That service stations usually require access from both streets of the intersection on
which they are located which would generate commercial traffic onto a local residential street,
thereby creating additional points of traffic confiict and congestion for the residents of the
area.
7. That three persons appeared representing seven persons present in the Council Chamber
opposing subject petition.
Cl-D
-1-
. . _ , :-...~-~:_: - -
, .,~ _
~
;~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the Anahelm City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
~~ Petition for Conditional Use Pertnit on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
s
r,~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 29th day of December, 1966.
J
CH IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN ING CO NISSION
~ ATTEST:
9
,
~-' `' ~ i~~~f (-~-Ul.~/
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Sectetery of the City Planning Commission of the City ot Anoheim, do hereby certify thet the fure-
going resolution wes pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City planning Cammission of the City of Anaheim, held on
December 19~ 1966, , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 heve hereunto set my hend this 29th day of December, 1966.
~ ( ~L~L ~tJ~%i~F LC~(/-~~
~%.
~. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~` ~ RESOLUTION NO. 174
~
~ C2-D .2_
r~
~
y~~
~
,' _ ~
~,+ atx -
'~ i
~ :9
~~ ;z
,
I .._. ._ _ _. ....
, . ..:..: ,,...
,~ ,--j7-- ~~,.'='--_: .._~., ,..:~,........ .
. .~ , . , ..,,,,.,... ._..~_. _. . .
. :. .. ...... . ..... .
~ ~ ~ ~ rF. -rl,,;Lrspa,
~
i'